Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQsvascular

Gen Surg SAQs · vascular

Non-removable offloading with adherence proof, probe-plus-X-ray osteomyelitis workup with duration ladder, and WIfI-quartile revascularisation with amputation honesty

Fellowship SAQ on diabetic-foot offloading hierarchy with adherence arithmetic, osteomyelitis diagnosis with probe-plus-X-ray and biopsy discipline plus the antibiotic duration ladder, and WIfI-quartile revascularisation counselling with amputation-level honesty.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 58-year-old man has a painless neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcer and asks why his cast must be non-removable when he owns a removable walker, a 64-year-old woman has a probeable plantar ulcer with an ESR of 85 and an equivocal X-ray and asks whether MRI settles the diagnosis and how long antibiotics last, and a 71-year-old man has a heel ulcer with absent pulses at WIfI stage 4 asking for a bypass to save the leg and whether a transmetatarsal amputation is final if needed. (A) Counsel the man on the offloading ladder with TCC, iTCC and honesty-trial numbers. (4 marks) (B) Work up the woman with probe-plus-X-ray accuracy, MRI discipline with biopsy, and the duration ladder. (3 marks) (C) Stage the man by WIfI benefit quartile with BASIL-2 and BEST-CLI-diabetes numbers and counsel amputation level with transmetatarsal honesty. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

(A) The 58-year-old needing non-removable offloading — ladder, cast, adherence proof, honest bounds (4 marks). Recite the IWGDF ladder: non-removable knee-high first, removable knee-high or ankle-high second on contraindication or intolerance, footwear-plus-felt third — with failed forefoot offloading earning Achilles lengthening, metatarsal-head resection, arthroplasty or osteotomy.[18] Prove the cast with Armstrong TCC (63 superficial non-infected non-ischaemic ulcers): 89.5% TCC against 65.0% walker and 58.3% half-shoe at 12 weeks (OR 5.4), with TCC patients taking 600 against 1462 steps.[20] Prove adherence is the mechanism with iTCC (50 Texas-1A ulcers): wrapping the walker lifts healing from 51.9 to 82.6% and cuts time from 58.0 to 41.6 days.[21] Bound the claim honestly: Faglia equivalence at 73.9 versus 72.7% is a 45-patient finding, not a ladder inversion; Lavery finds TCC 69.6% against boot 22.2% and sandal 44.5%; Bus ties three removables at 58/60/70% with adherence and stride counts as the explanation — and the pools agree at RRp 1.43 over removable and 1.68 over shoes with TCC equal to instant TCC at 1.06.[22][23][24][25]

(B) The 64-year-old with possible osteomyelitis — combine before scanning, biopsy before committing, shorten by the ladder (3 marks). Start at the bedside: ulcer over 2 cm² (LR 7.2), positive probe (LR 6.4) and ESR over 70 (LR 11) each move the probability, and at 12% prevalence the probe's positive value is only 0.57 against a 0.98 negative — positive rules little in, negative rules out.[28][29] Combine probe with X-ray before MRI: sequential sensitivity 0.97 with specificity 0.92 (LR 12.8/0.02) and only 6.6% double-negative disease — pooled 0.94 with DOR 82, MRI-comparable and inexpensive but expertise-dependent.[32][31] Discipline the MRI: preferred test at 0.90/0.79 sensitivity/specificity, yet 29.3% go unconfirmed at biopsy with 12 false positives — so biopsy with culture or histology stays gold with an integrated clinic-radiologist-biopsy approach.[33][35][28] Shorten antibiotics to the tested floors as study regimens: 6 weeks equals 12 at 65% remission with gut events 15 versus 45%; 3 equals 6 post-debridement at 84 versus 73%; 10 days equals 20 for soft tissue at 77 versus 71% — disclosing the 23-versus-16% new-osteomyelitis tail on the shortest course.[36][37][38]

(C) The 71-year-old WIfI-4 heel ulcer — quartile first, trials second, amputation counselled not dictated (3 marks). Stage benefit before promising salvage: Q4 limbs face 25.7% one-year amputation against 7.2% in Q1 at hazard 4.26, with over half amputated despite patent revascularisation — wound and infection burden decide.[12] Quote strategy by PLAN: BASIL-2 infrapopliteal randomisation (345) favours endovascular-first on amputation-free survival (HR 1.35 against vein-first, death-driven) with £1690 saved — while BEST-CLI-diabetes (1777, 69.2% diabetic) prices late WIfI presentation at 73.7 versus 45.9% with amputation 1.75-fold and death 1.63-fold independent.[43][44][45] Counsel the level: deep infection with pulses favours below-ankle healing yet nothing alone excludes it — minor amputations heal below-ankle in 64% (79% of survivors) at 26 median weeks — but transmetatarsal honesty prices pooled major amputation at 30.16% with re-amputation at 28.37%, so the first forefoot cut consents the proximal ladder.[53][52][50]

References24ShowHide
  1. [18]Bus SA, et al. Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2024.PMID 37226568
  2. [19]Lazzarini PA, et al. Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2020.PMID 32176438
  3. [20]Armstrong DG, et al. Off-loading the diabetic foot wound: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 2001.PMID 11375363
  4. [21]Armstrong DG, et al. Evaluation of removable and irremovable cast walkers in the healing of diabetic foot wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2005.PMID 15735186
  5. [22]Faglia E, et al. Effectiveness of removable walker cast versus nonremovable fiberglass off-bearing cast in the healing of diabetic plantar foot ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2010.PMID 20357377
  6. [23]Lavery LA, et al. Randomised clinical trial to compare total contact casts, healing sandals and a shear-reducing removable boot to heal diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J, 2015.PMID 24618113
  7. [24]Bus SA, et al. The efficacy of removable devices to offload and heal neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcers in people with diabetes: a single-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J, 2018.PMID 29057609
  8. [25]Morona JK, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of different off-loading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2013.PMID 23303652
  9. [28]Butalia S, et al. Does this patient with diabetes have osteomyelitis of the lower extremity? JAMA, 2008.PMID 18285592
  10. [29]Lavery LA, et al. Probe-to-bone test for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: reliable or relic? Diabetes Care, 2007.PMID 17259493
  11. [31]Calvo-Wright MDM, et al. Is the Combination of Plain X-ray and Probe-to-Bone Test Useful for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med, 2023.PMID 37629412
  12. [32]Aragón-Sánchez J, et al. Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: is the combination of probe-to-bone test and plain radiography sufficient for high-risk inpatients? Diabet Med, 2011.PMID 21219428
  13. [33]Dinh MT, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination and imaging tests for osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers: meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis, 2008.PMID 18611152
  14. [35]La Fontaine J, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Imaging Accuracy in Biopsy-Proven Disease. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2021.PMID 33214100
  15. [36]Tone A, et al. Six-week versus twelve-week antibiotic therapy for nonsurgically treated diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a multicenter open-label controlled randomized study. Diabetes Care, 2015.PMID 25414157
  16. [37]Gariani K, et al. Three Weeks Versus Six Weeks of Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Pilot Trial. Clin Infect Dis, 2021.PMID 33242083
  17. [38]Pham TT, et al. Moderate to Severe Soft Tissue Diabetic Foot Infections: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Trial of Post-debridement Antibiotic Treatment for 10 versus 20 days. Ann Surg, 2022.PMID 35623048
  18. [12]Hicks CW, et al. Evaluation of revascularization benefit quartiles using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system for diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg, 2021.PMID 33813024
  19. [43]Conte MS, et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg, 2019.PMID 31159978
  20. [44]Moakes CA, et al. Vein bypass first vs. best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia due to infra-popliteal disease: the BASIL-2 RCT. Health Technol Assess, 2024.PMID 39397484
  21. [45]Ochoa Chaar CI, et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg, 2025.PMID 39332785
  22. [50]Thorud JC, et al. Reoperation and Reamputation After Transmetatarsal Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016.PMID 27475711
  23. [53]Larsson J, et al. Local signs and symptoms in relation to final amputation level in diabetic patients. A prospective study of 187 patients with foot ulcers. Acta Orthop Scand, 1994.PMID 7976281
  24. [52]Svensson H, et al. Minor amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus and severe foot ulcers achieves good outcomes. J Wound Care, 2011.PMID 21727875
PreviousFistula-first choice with conversion arithmetic, maturation pricing with anaesthesia lever, and steal graded to DRILvascularNextScreening invitation, small-AAA calendar and the ruptured night — intervals, thresholds and strategyvascular