Gen Surg SAQs · trauma
Garage-fire burn with soot-stained airway and 35 ml/hr urine output — TBSA method, resuscitation endpoints, and inhalation grading
Fellowship SAQ on burns assessment and resuscitation: TBSA accuracy, fluid-creep volumes with endpoints, inhalation grading with mortality, referral gap, rBaux prognosis.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 34-year-old man arrives after a garage fire with mixed-depth trunk and arm burns, soot around the mouth and a hoarse voice. Field estimates range 15–25%, he receives 500 mL/h crystalloid, and urine output holds at 35 ml/hr. (A) State your TBSA method with the EasyTBSA-versus-classic numbers and the deviation data behind re-measurement. (4 marks) (B) State your resuscitation volumes with the ABRUPT/review/creep numbers, your five-endpoint bundle with the yardstick failure, and the least-fluid rule. (3 marks) (C) State your inhalation workup with the bronchoscopy-grade numbers and mortality additivity, referral decision with the ABA-gap numbers, and prognosis with the rBaux/lactate numbers. (3 marks)
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Model answer
- TBSA method: assess by Lund Browder Chart, Rule of Nines or Rule of Palms — all assume fixed body-part shares and ignore sex, age, weight, height and shape.[1]
- Accuracy order: EasyTBSA -0.01% (SD 3.59) beats Palms 3.92%, Lund-Browder 4.42% and Nines 5.05% — name the method and its bias aloud.[2]
- Deviation discipline: expert estimates deviate to 62% of the mean with 161% overestimation vs computer — re-measure at the door because misestimation buys transfer and overload.[3][2]
- Volumes: ABRUPT first-24h at/above Parkland (albumin 5.2 ± 2.3 vs crystalloid 3.7 ± 1.7); review mean 5.2±1.1mL/kg per %TBSA with wide variability; single-centre 6.3 +/- 2.9 with 76% above the 4.3 Baxter ceiling.[4][5][7]
- Endpoints: integrate MAP, HR, UO, lactate and base deficit with lactate superior and no single endpoint sufficient; 30 to 50 ml/hr plus MAP above 70 are yardsticks that fail while lactate/BD stay high — resuscitate with the least fluid for perfusion.[9][10]
- Inhalation: history does not predict mortality — bronchoscope within 24h; severe grades carry adjusted OR 45.357 with ventilation OR 9.787; three-level deaths run 2.3/7.4/30.7% with ventilation 26/84/94 h.[13][16]
- Additivity: inhalation alone adds up to 20% mortality, pneumonia 40%, both about 60% — maximal midrange.[14]
- Referral and prognosis: 70% of admissions meet ABA criteria yet 48% of eligible nonburn cases go untransferred — transfer him; rBaux summary AUC 0.93 (weak at age extremes) rising from 0.906 to 0.938 with admission lactate.[17][18][19]
References14ShowHide
- [1]Giretzlehner M, Ganitzer I, Haller H. Technical and Medical Aspects of Burn Size Assessment and Documentation. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021.PMID 33807630
- [2]Colson CD, Alberto EC, Milestone ZP, et al. EasyTBSA as a method for calculating total body surface area burned: a validation study. Emerg Med J, 2023.PMID 36639224
- [3]Giretzlehner M, Dirnberger J, Owen R, et al. The determination of total burn surface area: How much difference? Burns, 2013.PMID 23566430
- [4]Greenhalgh DG, Cartotto R, Taylor SL, et al. Burn Resuscitation Practices in North America: Results of the Acute Burn ResUscitation Multicenter Prospective Trial (ABRUPT). Ann Surg, 2023.PMID 34417368
- [5]Shah A, Pedraza I, Mitchell C, et al. Fluid volumes infused during burn resuscitation 1980-2015: A quantitative review. Burns, 2020.PMID 31862276
- [7]Cartotto R, Zhou A. Fluid creep: the pendulum hasn't swung back yet! J Burn Care Res, 2010.PMID 20616649
- [9]Belaunzaran M, Raslan S, Ali A, et al. Utilization and Efficacy of Resuscitation Endpoints in Trauma and Burn Patients: A Review Article. Am Surg, 2022.PMID 34761698
- [10]Jeng JC, Lee K, Jablonski K, et al. Serum lactate and base deficit suggest inadequate resuscitation of patients with burn injuries: application of a point-of-care laboratory instrument. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1997.PMID 9313119
- [13]You K, Yang HT, Kym D, et al. Inhalation injury in burn patients: establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis. Burns, 2014.PMID 25406889
- [14]Shirani KZ, Pruitt BA Jr, Mason AD Jr. The influence of inhalation injury and pneumonia on burn mortality. Ann Surg, 1987.PMID 3800465
- [16]Aung MT, Garner D, Pacquola M, et al. The use of a simple three-level bronchoscopic assessment of inhalation injury to predict in-hospital mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with burns. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2018.PMID 29361258
- [17]Carter JE, Neff LP, Holmes JH 4th. Adherence to burn center referral criteria: are patients appropriately being referred? J Burn Care Res, 2010.PMID 20061833
- [18]Edgar MC, Bond SM, Jiang SH, et al. The Revised Baux Score as a Predictor of Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Burn Care Res, 2023.PMID 37220881
- [19]Steinvall I, Elmasry M, Abdelrahman I, et al. Addition of admission lactate levels to Baux score improves mortality prediction in severe burns. Sci Rep, 2021.PMID 34508143