Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQsbreast

Gen Surg SAQs · breast

Node-positive cancer downstaged by chemotherapy — clipped-node targeted dissection, ultrasound triage and omission numbers

Fellowship SAQ on post-neoadjuvant axilla: SENTINA/Z1071 false-negative hierarchy with clipped-node rescue and TAD numbers, ultrasound cortical and morphologic triage, and downstaging omission outcomes.

10 marks12 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 48-year-old woman presents with biopsy-proven cN1 breast cancer and receives neoadjuvant chemotherapy with clinical nodal response. She asks how you will stage the axilla, why a clip was placed, what ultrasound now means, and when dissection can be omitted. (A) State your SENTINA/Z1071 accuracy baseline with detection and false-negative numbers by nodes removed, and your clipped-node rescue plan with FNR numbers. (5 marks) (B) Her post-chemotherapy ultrasound shows a type VI node without hilum. Interpret residual-disease risk with the Z1071 ultrasound numbers. (2 marks) (C) She achieves nodal downstaging and asks about omitting dissection. Quote the Montagna TAD/SLNB omission outcomes and retrieval numbers. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

(A) Accuracy baseline and clipped-node rescue (5 marks)

  • Stage the timing honestly: sentinel biopsy before chemotherapy detects 99.1% reliably, while after cN+ to ycN0 conversion detection falls to 80.1% with false-negative rate 14.2% — reliable before, degraded after.[13]
  • Stratify by nodes removed: false-negative rate 24.3% with one node and 18.5% with two nodes in the converted arm — remove more than one sentinel node.[13]
  • State the Z1071 baseline: false-negative rate 12.6% with sentinel surgery after chemotherapy in node-positive disease, in T0-T4 N1-N2 patients undergoing sentinel surgery plus dissection after chemotherapy.[12]
  • Rescue with the clip: clipped node in the sentinel specimen gives false-negative rate 6.8%, stranded in the dissection specimen gives 19.0% — clip placement with removal during sentinel surgery reduces the false-negative rate.[12]
  • Define TAD as sentinel dissection plus iodine-seed localisation with selective clipped-node removal; sentinel-alone false-negative rate 10.1% falls to 1.4% with the clipped node, and TAD with dissection gives 2.0% — while 23% of clipped nodes lie outside the sentinel packet including six with negative sentinels but clipped-node metastasis.[14]

(B) Post-chemotherapy ultrasound interpretation (2 marks)

  • Set the base rate: residual nodal disease in 61.0% with complete nodal response in 39.0% across 611 post-chemotherapy ultrasounds — most converted axillae still harbour disease.[16]
  • Apply cortex and morphology: cortical thickness 3.5 mm versus 2.5 mm marks residual disease; type I-II carry the lowest residual rate at 56.0-56.1% while type VI carries the highest at 80.0%; absence of fatty hilum marks residual disease — her type VI hilum-less node sits at the highest-risk end.[16]

(C) Omission after downstaging (3 marks)

  • Quote the downstaging cohort: 1144 stage II-III biopsy-proven node-positive cancers across 25 centres, with clipped-node retrieval 97% by TAD versus 86% by sentinel surgery without localisation.[15]
  • Quote the omission outcomes: 5-year axillary 1.0%, locoregional 2.7% and any invasive 10% recurrence, with 3-year axillary recurrence 0.5% versus 0.8% for TAD versus sentinel surgery — rare and not significantly lower with TAD, supporting omission in this population.[15]
References5ShowHide
  1. [12]Boughey JC, et al. Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg, 2016.PMID 26649589
  2. [13]Kuehn T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol, 2013.PMID 23683750
  3. [14]Caudle AS, et al. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol, 2016.PMID 26811528
  4. [15]Montagna G, et al. Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol, 2024.PMID 38662396
  5. [16]Le-Petross HT, et al. Axillary Ultrasound Identifies Residual Nodal Disease After Chemotherapy: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 Trial (Alliance). AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018.PMID 29381381
PreviousMastectomy with planned radiotherapy plus nipple-sparing request — technique choice, timing and envelope safetybreastNextScreen-recalled calcifications with low-grade DCIS on core biopsy — consent, BI-RADS, upgrade rule and surveillance-versus-surgery choicebreast