Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQsendocrine

Gen Surg SAQs · endocrine

Imaging verdicts with washout traps, blockade arithmetic, and Conn cure counselling

Fellowship SAQ on adrenal incidentaloma imaging thresholds with washout traps and MACS workup, phaeochromocytoma blockade choice with instability predictors, and Conn cure counselling with PASO predictors.

10 marks12 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 52-year-old woman has a 2.8 cm lipid-poor right adrenal nodule found on CT for renal colic; a 41-year-old man has paroxysmal hypertension with raised plasma metanephrines and a 4.5 cm left adrenal phaeochromocytoma booked for laparoscopic adrenalectomy; and a 58-year-old man has resistant hypertension with lateralising primary aldosteronism. (A) Deliver the incidentaloma verdict: imaging thresholds, hormonal screen and MACS logic. (4 marks) (B) Choose blockade with trial splits, selectivity trade-offs and instability predictors. (3 marks) (C) Counsel the Conn patient with PASO cure arithmetic and predictors. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

(A) Judge the nodule by density first, washout second, hormones always: at 2.8 cm lipid-poor it needs dedicated adrenal imaging — HU 10 or less exempts everything, while only inhomogeneous lesions above 4 cm with HU above 20 default to surgery with the middle ground discussed multidisciplinarily.[1] Washout rules benignity in at 100% predictive value with 30 mm/20 HU, 40 mm/15 HU, relative above 53% or absolute above 78% — classical 60/40 only with normal metanephrines.[16] Never trust washout to exclude phaeochromocytoma: 60%-plus washout still hides 6.9% phaeochromocytomas, and 28.9% of phaeochromocytomas wash like adenomas — so HU 10 or less alone exempts metanephrine testing.[17][18] Screen every mass with metanephrines plus 1-mg dexamethasone at 50 nmol/L (1.8 µg/dL); above-cutoff cortisol without Cushing features is MACS with morbidity-mortality risk, operated individualistically with comorbidities and weighed on malignancy, hormones, age, fitness and preference.[1]

(B) Block two to three weeks to pressure targets and quote the split: PRESCRIPT ties out-of-target time at 11.1% phenoxybenzamine against 12.2% doxazosin but favours phenoxybenzamine on instability score 38.0 against 50.0 — stability without proven outcome gain, cardiovascular events tied.[2] Selectivity costs support: sub-80 systolic in 67% against 35% with more postoperative pressor or ICU need.[4] Size warns: each centimetre multiplies severe hypertensive episodes 1.40-fold and pressor odds 1.23-fold, with selective blockade multiplying over-200 episodes 20.9-fold.[7]

(C) Promise chemistry, forecast pressure: PASO counts 37% complete and 47% partial clinical success against 94% biochemical cure across 705 adrenalectomies.[12] Favour the young woman on few drugs: female 2.25-fold complete-success odds, 5% less per year of age, 20% less per extra drug unit — operate lateralised disease for near-certain biochemical cure with probable partial pressure gain.[12]

References8ShowHide
  1. [1]Fassnacht M, et al. European Society of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol, 2023.PMID 37318239
  2. [2]Buitenwerf E, et al. Efficacy of α-Blockers on Hemodynamic Control during Pheochromocytoma Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020.PMID 31714582
  3. [4]Randle RW, et al. Selective Versus Non-selective α-Blockade Prior to Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017.PMID 27561909
  4. [7]Kiernan CM, et al. Predictors of hemodynamic instability during surgery for pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014.PMID 24939623
  5. [12]Williams TA, et al. Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2017.PMID 28576687
  6. [16]Marty M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography to identify adenomas among adrenal incidentalomas in an endocrinological population. Eur J Endocrinol, 2018.PMID 29467231
  7. [17]Akbulut S, et al. A Critical Analysis of Computed Tomography Washout in Lipid-Poor Adrenal Incidentalomas. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021.PMID 33210268
  8. [18]Canu L, et al. CT Characteristics of Pheochromocytoma: Relevance for the Evaluation of Adrenal Incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019.PMID 30383267
PreviousBethesda V nodule with NIFTP correction and molecular rescue, microcarcinoma surveillance by contract, and central-neck indication arithmeticendocrineNextSmall pancreatic tumour verdicts, insulinoma localisation ladders, and gastrinoma cure operationsendocrine