Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Casesvascular

Gen Surg Cases · vascular

Active venous ulcer with superficial-plus-segmental-deep reflux — stratum, timing, and staying healed

Fellowship clinical-management station on active venous ulceration with superficial-plus-segmental-deep reflux: ESCHAR stratum-specific recurrence counselling, EVRA early-ablation timing, concomitant tributary planning, compression-system choice, and recurrence-prevention cover.

clinical-management1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 71-year-old woman has an 8-week medial gaiter ulcer over a refluxing great saphenous trunk with bulky tributaries. Duplex shows great saphenous reflux with segmental deep reflux and no deep occlusion; pulses are present. She asks whether surgery helps ulcers heal faster, when ablation should happen, whether her tributaries need separate treatment, and what keeps the ulcer from coming back. The candidate must stratify her deep reflux, reconcile healing with recurrence, time ablation, plan tributaries, and prescribe staying-healed cover.

Candidate tasks and model management

Stratify her deep reflux before promising anything. She sits in the segmental-deep stratum — not isolated superficial, not total deep — so quote the stratum-specific dividend: at 3 years recurrence runs 52 versus 24% with added surgery (P=0.04), matching the isolated-superficial dividend (51 vs 27% at 4 years), while total deep reflux dissolves it (46 vs 32% ns).[10] Confirm the pattern on duplex of the ulcerated leg — ESCHAR imaged 500 consecutive legs this way — and note surgery abolished segmental deep reflux in 10 of 22 such legs.[9][11]

Reconcile healing with recurrence honestly. Tell her surgery does not hasten healing — 24-week healing tied 65 versus 65%, 3-year tied 89 versus 93% — but halves 12-month recurrence (12 vs 28%) and buys ulcer-free time (78 vs 71% at 3 years).[9][10] Then offer speed through early ablation: within 2 weeks of randomisation, healing hazard 1.38 with median 56 against 82 days and 24-week healing 85.6 against 76.3%.[12]

Plan tributaries and compression in the same sitting. Treat tributaries concomitantly — 6 randomised trials, reintervention cut to one-third with no safety penalty — and set expectations with the Marston arc: 57/74/78% healed at 3/6/12 months with recurrence at 9/20/29% across 1–3 years, worsened by deep insufficiency and skipped phlebectomy.[26][32] Bandage to heal by tolerance — 21 trials show no system heals meaningfully faster, with four-layer-or-hosiery cost-effective — then convert the healed leg to stockings: European class-3 halves reulceration against none and class-3 beats class-2.[35][34] Cover high-thrombosis-risk legs with 1–2 weeks of low-molecular-weight heparin by consensus rather than a single dose.[37]

References9ShowHide
  1. [9]Barwell JR, et al. Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004.PMID 15183623
  2. [10]Gohel MS, et al. Long term results of compression therapy alone versus compression plus surgery in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR): randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2007.PMID 17545185
  3. [11]Gohel MS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of compression plus surgery versus compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study)--haemodynamic and anatomical changes. Br J Surg, 2005.PMID 15584055
  4. [12]Gohel MS, et al. A Randomized Trial of Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration. N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29688123
  5. [26]Xie Y, et al. Combined endovenous ablation with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy versus endovenous ablation alone for lower limb varicose veins: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phlebology, 2026.PMID 41990331
  6. [35]Phung H, et al. Compression systems for venous leg ulcers: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. EClinicalMedicine, 2026.PMID 42518940
  7. [34]de Moraes Silva MA, et al. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024.PMID 38451842
  8. [32]Marston WA, et al. Incidence of venous leg ulcer healing and recurrence after treatment with endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2017.PMID 28623990
  9. [37]Dattani N, et al. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism following superficial endovenous treatment: A UK and Republic of Ireland consensus study. Phlebology, 2020.PMID 32611228
PreviousTwo-year persistent painful bilateral gynaecomastia — tamoxifen course, surgical plan and cancer counsellingbreastNextAortoiliac claudicant with a diabetic foot ulcer in the family — exercise prescription, revascularisation restraint, and arterial assessment of every ulcervascular