Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Casessurgical-critical-care

Gen Surg Cases · surgical-critical-care

Polytrauma with bleeding and cord injury — competing shocks, ratio blood, early TXA

Fellowship clinical-management station on competing haemorrhagic and neurogenic shock: four-category classification, dynamic fluid challenges, norepinephrine-first pressors, 1:1:1 transfusion, TXA timing gradient and level-matched neurogenic management.

clinical-management2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 29-year-old motorcyclist arrives after a high-speed crash: systolic pressure 78 mmHg, heart rate 128/min, cold clammy skin, lactate 5.2 mmol/L, open femoral fracture with active bleeding, chest wall bruising, and absent movement below the nipples with warm dry skin over the legs and a heart rate that will not rise. Blood gas shows Hb 88 g/L. The candidate must classify the competing shocks, resuscitate with fluids, pressors and blood, time tranexamic acid, and set the ICU and spinal-precaution pathway.

Management walkthrough

Classify both shocks aloud — bleeding first, cord injury alongside. The femoral bleed with cold clammy hypotension, tachycardia and lactate 5.2 is hypovolaemic shock of the blood-and-fluids compartment: absolute volume loss, treated by fluid replacement with balanced crystalloids and blood.[1] The absent movement below the nipples with warm dry legs and a non-rising heart rate is the second shock: a high-thoracic/cervical pattern where destroyed sympathetic activity with unopposed vagal drive gives hypotension plus bradycardia, against lower-thoracic pooling that gives hypotension alone.[32] Say both, treat bleeding as the killer first, and exclude the third category — obstructive chest injury (tension, tamponade, massive haemothorax) needs immediate life-saving intervention, not fluids-and-wait.[35][1]

Resuscitate with tested challenges, pressors early, blood by ratio. Balanced-crystalloid challenges with dynamic responsiveness testing before each bolus — static markers are repeatedly unreliable, blind fluids often give no benefit, and excess harms lungs already bruised.[10] Start norepinephrine early to MAP 65+ rather than dopamine: arrhythmia 24.1% versus 12.4% and meta-analytic mortality relative risk 0.89 with number needed to treat 9.[22][23] Activate 1:1:1 plasma:platelets:red cells — no 24-hour mortality difference but exsanguination death 9.2% versus 14.6% with more haemostasis and no extra complications — while compressing, splinting and booking haemorrhage control (fracture, chest, abdomen) in parallel.[29]

Give TXA now — the clock is the decision. Tranexamic acid 1 g over 10 minutes then 1 g over 8 hours: all-cause death 14.5% versus 16.0%, bleeding death 4.9% versus 5.7%.[30] Within the hour the bleeding-death relative risk is 0.68, at 1-to-3 hours 0.79, after 3 hours 1.44 harm — in the trauma bay he is inside benefit, so give it with the first blood, never after the third hour.[31]

Manage the cord injury as its own resuscitation. Maintain euvvolaemia with crystalloids and maintain or augment MAP with pressors matched to injury level and haemodynamics — bradycardic high lesions need chronotropic/inotropic thinking, not fluids alone — with full spinal precautions, log-roll, urinary catheter, pressure care and ICU-level perfusion monitoring from arrival.[32] Disposition is ICU with trauma, orthopaedic, thoracic and spinal input; re-escalation triggers (MAP, urine, mentation, refill, lactate trajectory) are written, not assumed.

References9ShowHide
  1. [1]Standl T, Annecke T, Cascorbi I, et al. The Nomenclature, Definition and Distinction of Types of Shock. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2018.PMID 30573009
  2. [10]Monnet X, Teboul JL Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Ann Transl Med, 2020.PMID 32647715
  3. [22]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
  4. [23]Avni T, Lador A, Lev S, Leibovici L, et al. Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2015.PMID 26237037
  5. [29]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
  6. [30]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
  7. [31]Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, Brohi K, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011.PMID 21439633
  8. [32]Iovine JA, Villanueva RD, Werth CM, et al. Contemporary hemodynamic management of acute spinal cord injuries with intravenous and enteral vasoactive agents: A narrative review. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2022.PMID 35677966
  9. [35]Pich H, Heller AR [Obstructive shock]. Anaesthesist, 2015.PMID 25994928
PreviousEmergency laparotomy with septic shock and oliguria — bundle, fluids, dialysis timing and follow-upsurgical-critical-careNextPost-gastrectomy refractory hypoxemia — lung-protective reset, proning, source hunt and ECMO referralsurgical-critical-care