Gen Surg Cases · surgical-critical-care
Day-2 post-laparotomy failure with basal collapse, overnight FFP and an epidural — fork, reverse, relieve and rescue
Fellowship clinical-management station on postoperative respiratory failure: five-fork differential, ARISCAT stratification, PEEP-triad ventilation discipline, SNaPP reversal, MASTER analgesia, Jaber curative NIV vs PRISM/OPERA prophylaxis negativity, TRALI donor logic and spirometry negatives.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Tasks
- Examine her breathing, pain, fluid balance and transfusion record, then declare the leading fork with reasons — atelectasis, aspiration, TRALI, overload, ARDS or simple hypoxaemia.[2][34]
- State her ARISCAT-style risk and what it changes about monitoring and rescue planning.[2]
- Defend or criticise her intraoperative ventilation and reversal — quote the PEEP triad and SNaPP.[5][17]
- Judge the epidural: keep, stop, or replace — with MASTER numbers.[23]
- Prescribe pressure support now: prophylactic CPAP, HFNC, or curative NIV — with PRISM, OPERA and Jaber logic — and set the escalation rule.[26][27][29]
- Split any transfusion contribution from overload and state the aspiration precautions for her ongoing care.[34][36]
Model management
Fork first: atelectasis with splinting until proven otherwise. Basal collapse with pain-limited inspiration on day 2 is the SNaPP phenotype — PPC-or-death 19.0 versus 21.5 percent by reversal choice, driven by atelectasis — so confirm reversal history, test the block, sit her up and treat pain before ordering scans.[17] Keep aspiration (3.7 per 10,000 under liberal fasting — rare but examined through airway planning), TRALI (distress within 6 hours of plasma — check timing and product), overload (fluid-positive examination) and ARDS (low-stretch escalation pathway) explicitly open until each is excluded.[36][34]
Risk and ventilation discipline. She carries five ARISCAT factors against a 5-percent derivation event rate with a forty-fold death gradient — high-observation care with a declared NIV and reintubation plan.[2] Her operation should have run low tidal volumes with low PEEP and no routine recruitment — PROVHILO 40 versus 39 percent with hypotension cost on high PEEP — because driving pressure (OR 1.16 per unit, sole mediator) is the instrument, not PEEP itself.[5]
Epidural stays; NIV starts; bundle replaces talisman. MASTER allows exactly one claim — respiratory failure 23 versus 30 percent with better pain — so keep the epidural for splinting relief, not survival.[23] Established failure earns NIV now (Jaber: reintubation 33.1 versus 45.5 percent), never prophylactic CPAP (PRISM: 8.1 versus 8.2 percent) or preventive HFNC (OPERA null) — with escalation to reintubation the moment NIV fails.[29][26][27] Physiotherapy and mobilisation as a bundle; no spirometry talisman; transfusion split by timing, product and examination.[34]
References9ShowHide
- [17]Leslie K, Darvall JN, Chan MTV, et al. Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications (SNaPP): an international, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial. Lancet Respir Med, 2026.PMID 42263720
- [29]Jaber S, Lescot T, Futier E, et al. Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation on Tracheal Reintubation Among Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Following Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2016.PMID 26975890
- [2]Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology, 2010.PMID 21045639
- [5]Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, et al. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2014.PMID 24894577
- [23]Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002.PMID 11965272
- [34]Müller MC, van Stein D, Binnekade JM, et al. Low-risk transfusion-related acute lung injury donor strategies and the impact on the onset of transfusion-related acute lung injury: a meta-analysis. Transfusion, 2015.PMID 25135630
- [36]Marsman M, Derksen M, Veltcamp Helbach M, et al. Effect of a liberal fluid fasting policy before surgery on the incidence of aspiration: a single centre retrospective observational study. BJA Open, 2026.PMID 42421784
- [26]PRISM trial group. Postoperative continuous positive airway pressure to prevent pneumonia, re-intubation, and death after major abdominal surgery (PRISM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med, 2021.PMID 34153272
- [27]Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Godet T, et al. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a French multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Med, 2016.PMID 27771739