Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

GP Topicswomens-health

GP · womens-health

Breast symptoms in general practice

Also known as Breast lump · Mastalgia · Nipple discharge · Triple assessment

GP-fellowship guide to breast symptoms: the triple assessment and its measured accuracy, sorting lumps by age and findings, mastalgia management with the evidence against evening primrose oil, nipple discharge and papilloma upgrade rates, breast abscess drainage, the benign-diagnosis reassurance gap, and the referral rules that keep cancer detection safe.

medium28 referencesUpdated 25 Aug 202611 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACGP AKTRACGP KFPRACGP CCE

Red flags

  • A discrete lump in a woman over 30 is cancer until triple assessment proves otherwise — clinical benignity alone never discharges the referral
  • Peau d'orange, skin tethering, nipple retraction or new nipple inversion is a cancer pathway referral regardless of the palpability of any lump
  • Mastitis that fails to respond to a completed antibiotic course, especially in a non-lactating woman or smoker, needs imaging and biopsy — inflammatory cancer mimics mastitis
  • A painless, progressively enlarging firm lump in a woman over 40 suggests a phyllodes tumour — refer; these are undersampled on core biopsy and excised, not observed
  • Blood-stained single-duct nipple discharge in a woman over 40 requires imaging and biopsy — intraductal papilloma carries a 21% upgrade to DCIS when atypia is present
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACGP AKTRACGP KFPRACGP CCE

Red flags

  • A discrete lump in a woman over 30 is cancer until triple assessment proves otherwise — clinical benignity alone never discharges the referral
  • Peau d'orange, skin tethering, nipple retraction or new nipple inversion is a cancer pathway referral regardless of the palpability of any lump
  • Mastitis that fails to respond to a completed antibiotic course, especially in a non-lactating woman or smoker, needs imaging and biopsy — inflammatory cancer mimics mastitis
  • A painless, progressively enlarging firm lump in a woman over 40 suggests a phyllodes tumour — refer; these are undersampled on core biopsy and excised, not observed
  • Blood-stained single-duct nipple discharge in a woman over 40 requires imaging and biopsy — intraductal papilloma carries a 21% upgrade to DCIS when atypia is present
Key points
  • Breast symptoms sort into four presentations — lump, pain, nipple discharge, and skin/nipple change — and every discrete lump in a woman over 30 goes to triple assessment regardless of how benign it feels.[15]
  • Triple assessment (clinical examination + imaging + tissue sampling) is the diagnostic standard: combined sensitivity 99–100% with specificity around 99%; core biopsy outperforms fine needle aspiration (sensitivity 96% vs 60% in one series).[9][2]
  • Breast pain occurs at some time in 70% of women; cancer is found in 1.24% of women with pain alone versus 16% when pain accompanies other symptoms — always examine, never just reassure.[8][5]
  • A third of women receiving a benign diagnosis are not reassured — the consultation must address the fear, not just the finding.[3]

Overview

Breast symptoms are among the commonest reasons women present to general practice, and the presenting symptom is almost always fear. The four presentations are a lump, breast pain (mastalgia), nipple discharge, and skin or nipple change. Benign disease dominates the caseload — in a consecutive series of 100 women with breast complaints, fibroadenoma accounted for 59%, fibroadenosis 19% and breast abscess 16% — but the consultation exists because cancer must be excluded, and the exclusion must be structured.[22]

The structure is triple assessment: clinical examination, imaging, and tissue sampling, read together. Combined, the three components reach sensitivity of 99–100% with specificity around 99% across series.[9][6] The GP's role is not to complete the triple assessment — imaging and biopsy are specialist-provided — but to recognise which symptoms need it, start it through the right pathway, and manage the large benign majority with evidence rather than reflex.[15]

General Practice Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the General Practice fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References28ShowHide
  1. [1]Khawaja AR, Allan SM Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference? Eur J Surg Oncol, 2000.PMID 11034802
  2. [2]Clarke D, Sudhakaran N, Gateley CA Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2001.PMID 11320918
  3. [3]Meechan GT, et al. Who is not reassured following benign diagnosis of breast symptoms? Psychooncology, 2005.PMID 15386770
  4. [4]Mansel R, et al. A phase II trial of Afimoxifene (4-hydroxytamoxifen gel) for cyclical mastalgia in premenopausal women Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007.PMID 17351746
  5. [5]Clegg-Lamptey JN, et al. Breast cancer risk in patients with breast pain in Accra, Ghana East Afr Med J, 2007.PMID 17892195
  6. [6]Ghimire B, et al. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2008.PMID 19079392
  7. [7]Donnelly J Breast lump detection: who is more accurate, patients or their GPs? Int J Clin Pract, 2010.PMID 20015214
  8. [8]Goyal A Breast pain BMJ Clin Evid, 2011.PMID 21477394
  9. [9]Jan M, et al. Triple assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer in Kashmir Indian J Surg, 2010.PMID 23133217
  10. [10]Kataria K, et al. A systematic review of current understanding and management of mastalgia Indian J Surg, 2014.PMID 25177120
  11. [11]Nakhlis F, et al. Papilloma on core biopsy: excision vs. observation Ann Surg Oncol, 2015.PMID 25361885
  12. [12]Saghafi N, et al. Effectiveness of Matricaria chamomilla (chamomile) extract on pain control of cyclic mastalgia: a double-blind randomised controlled trial J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018.PMID 29072514
  13. [13]Mišković J, et al. Diagnostic Value of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Breast Tumors Acta Clin Croat, 2016.PMID 29117654
  14. [14]Zhou Y, et al. Variation in 'fast-track' referrals for suspected cancer by patient characteristic and cancer diagnosis: evidence from 670 000 patients with cancers of 35 different sites Br J Cancer, 2018.PMID 29182609
  15. [15]Mazari FAK, et al. The need for triple assessment and predictors for diagnosis of breast cancer in patients <40 years of age Clin Radiol, 2018.PMID 29731127
  16. [16]Quinlan A, et al. Quantifying patient preferences for symptomatic breast clinic referral: a decision analysis study BMJ Open, 2018.PMID 29858402
  17. [17]Barakzai N, Mansoor E, Buccimazza I Is conservative management of fibroadenomas feasible? 5-year results from the Durban Breast Unit S Afr J Surg, 2021.PMID 34212569
  18. [18]Rai A, et al. Study of Diagnostic Delay among Symptomatic Breast Cancer Patients in Northern India: A Mixed-Methods Analysis from a Dedicated Breast Cancer Centre Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2022.PMID 35345361
  19. [19]Zhang M, et al. Imaging and Management of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation Radiographics, 2023.PMID 37856317
  20. [20]Gil Quessep E, et al. Subgroups varying in risk and density highlight the potential for stratified breast cancer screening Eur J Cancer, 2025.PMID 39805236
  21. [21]More RS, Dumbre S, Dikle AM Efficacy of Modified Triple Assessment in Diagnosing Breast Lesions: A Prospective Observational Study Cureus, 2025.PMID 40314043
  22. [22]Ahire P, et al. Unraveling Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Study of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Care Cureus, 2025.PMID 40600088
  23. [23]Jansen C, et al. Surgical treatment of breast fibroadenomas Dan Med J, 2025.PMID 41069312
  24. [24]Moshina N, et al. Breast cancer mortality among women who have attended BreastScreen Norway, 1996-2023 Breast Cancer Res, 2026.PMID 41845512
  25. [25]Pestrin O, et al. A longitudinal observational study of male referrals and adherence to imaging guidelines: a single centre experience in 148 patients Front Oncol, 2026.PMID 42022318
  26. [26]Scardina L, et al. Management of lactational and non-lactational breast abscesses: an evidence-based framework to support breast surgeon decision-making Updates Surg, 2026.PMID 42334816
  27. [27]Zhong W, et al. Clinical factors of prolonged treatment duration in patients with non-puerperal mastitis Gland Surg, 2026.PMID 42445087
  28. [28]Boldrini C, et al. The Gems and Pitfalls of Inflammatory Breast Disease: An Illustrated Review of Mastitis. What the Radiologist Should Know Radiol Res Pract, 2026.PMID 42540206

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case
General Practice Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete General Practice library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousIrritable bowel syndromegastrointestinal-healthNextCervical screening (HPV-based program)womens-health