Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

GP KFPs / SAQsinfectious-diseases

GP KFPs / SAQs · infectious-diseases

Antimicrobial stewardship in general practice — KFP-style written assessment

KFP-style staged scenarios on antimicrobial stewardship: the delayed-prescription consultation and its Cochrane evidence base, shared decision-making against patient expectation, penicillin allergy delabeling with PEN-FAST, and structuring a practice-level stewardship program from audit data.

30 marks45 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACGP KFPRACGP AKTMRCGP AKT
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACGP KFPRACGP AKTMRCGP AKT
Prompt
Antimicrobial stewardship: the delayed script done properly, the expectation conversation, the allergy label, and the practice program

KFP 1 (10 marks)

A 31-year-old office worker presents on day 3 of cough, coryza and mild sore throat. Observations normal, chest clear, FeverPAIN 1. She has a deadline at work and asks for 'anything to knock it on the head — antibiotics if you've got them'. [2]

  1. State her antibiotic use probability under each of the three prescribing strategies, with the Cochrane figures. (3) [2]
  2. Outline the exact content of a delayed-prescription consultation if you choose that strategy. (4) [2] [3]
  3. Name the patient group in whom delayed supply performed measurably worse than immediate supply. (1) [3]
  4. What symptom duration should she be warned to expect? (2) [4]

Model answers

  1. Cochrane 2023: antibiotic use 93% with immediate supply versus 30% with delayed supply, and 13% with no antibiotic versus 27% with delayed supply. Satisfaction was equal for delayed versus immediate (86% vs 91%) and favoured delay over no antibiotics (87% versus 82%). [2]
  2. Name the strategy explicitly: 'this is a back-up prescription, not a script to fill today'. State the activation threshold — for example pain or fever not settling by day 3–4 from now, or red-flag symptoms (rigors, breathlessness, unilateral facial pain). State that most people never need it. Write the earliest start date on the box. Provide written red-flag advice and a contingency review option. The individual patient data meta-analysis supports safety: symptom severity at 2–4 days identical across strategies, reconsultation reduced versus no supply (OR 0.72). [2] [3]
  3. Children younger than 5 years: slightly higher follow-up symptom severity with delayed versus immediate antibiotics (adjusted mean difference 0.10). [3]
  4. Cough rated 'at least a slight problem' lasts a mean of 11.7 days, and 25% of patients cough for 17 days or more. Antibiotics did not shorten this in the trial. [4]
General Practice Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this kfps / saq. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the General Practice fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References12ShowHide
  1. [1]McCullough AR, Pollack AJ, Plejdrup Hansen M, et al. Antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in general practice: comparison of prescribing rates with guideline recommendations Med J Aust, 2017.PMID 28701117
  2. [2]Spurling GK, Dooley L, Clark J, et al. Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 37791590
  3. [3]Stuart B, Hounkpatin H, Becque T, et al. Delayed antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: individual patient data meta-analysis BMJ, 2021.PMID 33910882
  4. [4]Little P, Rumsby K, Kelly J, et al. Information leaflet and antibiotic prescribing strategies for acute lower respiratory tract infection: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2005.PMID 15972565
  5. [5]Coxeter P, Del Mar CB, McGregor L, et al. Interventions to facilitate shared decision making to address antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 26560888
  6. [6]Gaarslev C, Yee M, Chan G, et al. A mixed methods study to understand patient expectations for antibiotics for an upper respiratory tract infection Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2016.PMID 27777760
  7. [7]Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, et al. Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule JAMA Intern Med, 2020.PMID 32176248
  8. [8]Blumenthal KG, Lu N, Zhang Y, et al. Risk of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in patients with a documented penicillin allergy: population based matched cohort study BMJ, 2018.PMID 29950489
  9. [9]Krishna MT, Huissoon AP, Li M, et al. Enhancing antibiotic stewardship by tackling "spurious" penicillin allergy Clin Exp Allergy, 2017.PMID 29028276
  10. [10]Xu AXT, Brown K, Schwartz KL, et al. Audit and Feedback Interventions for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Clin Infect Dis, 2025.PMID 39657007
  11. [11]Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, et al. Effect of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Among Primary Care Practices: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2016.PMID 26864410
  12. [12]Sanchez GV, Fleming-Dutra KE, Roberts RM, et al. Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2016.PMID 27832047
General Practice Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete General Practice library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousOral anticoagulation management — KFP-style written assessmenthaematological-presentationsNextAtopic eczema — KFP-style written assessmentdermatological-presentations