EM Vivas · Wound assessment and management
Wound assessment — tetanus and closure viva
Clinical viva on structured wound assessment, tetanus schedule and when not to close primarily.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
Dirty farm laceration 5 hours old; unknown tetanus history; candidate must structure MEAT, irrigation, tetanus products and closure decision.
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
Assessment, irrigation and tetanus. MEAT: mechanism, neurovascular/tendon examination before LA, anatomy, treatment plan. Tap water equals saline — 663 double-blind (3.5 vs 6.4 percent) and 715 multicentre (4 vs 3.3 percent, RR 1.21).[1][2] Tetanus per the ACIP wound indication with Td-or-Tdap flexibility.
Closure. Contaminated wounds (RR 2.0) often delayed primary/secondary intention; infection rises with age (OR 1.01/year), diabetes (OR 6.7), width (OR 1.05/mm) and foreign body (OR 2.6), while head/neck lowers it (OR 0.28).[3] Antibiotics if high risk; safety-net infection advice.
References3ShowHide
- [1]Weiss EA, Oldham G, Lin M, Foster E, Quinn JV. Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open, 2013.PMID 23325896
- [2]Moscati RM, Mayrose J, Reardon RF, et al. A multicenter comparison of tap water versus sterile saline for wound irrigation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2007.PMID 17456554
- [3]Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine SM, Shofer FS. Risk factors for infection in patients with traumatic lacerations. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2001.PMID 11435186