Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasUpper gastrointestinal bleed

EM Vivas · Upper gastrointestinal bleed

Upper GI bleed — scores, restrictive transfusion and two pathways

A clinical viva contrasting non-variceal and variceal pathways, reproducing Glasgow-Blatchford/Rockall/Forrest, and defending restrictive transfusion.

clinical2 min readSource-verified ·

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 72-year-old woman on ibuprofen presents with melaena. BP 108/70, HR 104, Hb 98 g/L, urea 14 mmol/L, creatinine 95 micromol/L. No known liver disease. Discuss risk stratification scores, transfusion strategy, pharmacotherapy, and how management would change if she had decompensated cirrhosis with haematemesis.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

Pathway. Without liver-disease stigmata this is a non-variceal presentation (peptic ulcer until proven otherwise). Admission urea and haemoglobin feed the Blatchford read alongside vitals and comorbidity.

Scores.

  • Glasgow-Blatchford predicts need for intervention from urea, Hb, SBP, pulse, melaena, syncope, hepatic disease, cardiac failure. Score 0 to 1 marks very-low-risk (outpatient pathway); this patient scores well above 1 (urea, tachycardia, melaena) → admit for endoscopy within 24 hours.[1][12]
  • Rockall (pre-endoscopic: age, shock, comorbidity; complete adds diagnosis and stigmata) predicts mortality.
  • AIMS65 (albumin, INR, mental status, SBP ≤90, age over 65) predicts in-hospital mortality simply.
  • Forrest at endoscopy: Ia spurting, Ib oozing, IIa visible vessel, IIb clot → combination endoscopic therapy; IIc/III low risk.

Transfusion. Do not transfuse this Hb 98 stable patient yet. Restrictive below 7 g/dL beats liberal below 9: survival 95 vs 91 percent, rebleed 10 vs 16 percent, gradient flat vs risen.[2] Consensus: below 80 without cardiovascular disease, higher with it.[13]

Non-variceal drugs. Omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/h for 72 hours after haemostasis — rebleed 6.7 vs 22.5 percent.[8] Endoscopy within 24 hours (6-hour urgency adds nothing).[13] Epinephrine plus thermal (RR 0.49) or mechanical (RR 0.31) second method — never alone.[14] Continue aspirin 80 mg after control: mortality 1.3 vs 12.9 percent vs rebleed 10.3 vs 5.4 percent.[4]

If she instead had cirrhosis + haematemesis (variceal pathway).

  • Vasoactive immediately for up to 5 days plus prophylactic antibiotics on arrival.
  • Urgent endoscopy with band ligation; severe rebleed takes covered TIPSS first; balloon bridges refractory episodes.
  • Early TIPSS within 72 hours for Child B-active or Child C under 14.
  • Same restrictive transfusion — liberal raises the portal gradient within 5 days.
Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet, 2000.PMID 11073021
  2. [2]Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013.PMID 23281973
  3. [8]Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. New England Journal of Medicine, 2000.PMID 10922420
  4. [4]Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ching JY, et al. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2010.PMID 19949136
  5. [12]Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ, 2017.PMID 28053181
  6. [13]Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2019.PMID 31634917
  7. [14]Vergara M, Bennett C, Calvet X, et al. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25308912
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousUpper airway obstruction — the cannot-intubate cannot-oxygenateUpper airway obstructionNextWhole blood vs component therapyDamage control resuscitation