EM Vivas · Spinal cord compression
Spinal cord compression — MSCC vs cauda equina vs abscess
Viva discriminating compressive myelopathy emergencies.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
MSCC. Cancer history, progressive pain (night), UMN signs if above conus, sensory level. Dexamethasone loading per the local protocol before MRI; MRI whole spine; direct decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy beats radiotherapy alone in selected single-level disease (Patchell).[1][2]
Cauda equina. LMN pattern: saddle anaesthesia, bilateral sciatica, retention/overflow, reduced anal tone, often large central disc. Urgent lumbosacral MRI and surgical decompression within 24–48 h. Steroids used similarly when cord/conus also threatened.[3]
Epidural abscess. Back pain ± fever ± deficit triad often incomplete; raised CRP; IVDU/diabetes. MRI whole spine; blood cultures; surgical drainage + IV antibiotics (vancomycin + third-generation cephalosporin or pip-tazo). Steroids controversial — specialist call; do not use steroids as sole therapy.[3]
Shared ED moves. Document neurology, protect spine, reverse coagulopathy if haematoma, parallel specialty calls, do not image only the painful level when malignancy/abscess suspected.[3]
References3ShowHide
- [1]Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2005.PMID 16112300
- [2]Bilsky MH, Laufer I, Fourney DR, et al. Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale. J Neurosurg Spine, 2010.PMID 20809724
- [3]Singer E, et al. Initial management and disposition of metastatic spinal cord compression in the emergency department: a review of the literature. Ann Med, 2025.PMID 41033840