EM Vivas · Secondary survey
Cervical spine clearance — the NEXUS criteria
A clinical viva on the NEXUS criteria for cervical-spine clearance.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
The five NEXUS criteria for the clinical clearance of the cervical spine are: (1) no midline cervical tenderness, (2) no focal neurological deficit, (3) a normal level of alertness (a fully awake and oriented patient, not intoxicated), (4) no intoxication (no alcohol, no drugs, no metabolic), and (5) no painful distracting injury (no long-bone fracture, no large laceration, no thermal injury that would distract the patient from the cervical-spine pain). All five must be met to clear the cervical spine clinically; the failure of any one mandates the imaging.[2] The limitations are that the NEXUS criteria have a high sensitivity but a lower specificity (the derivation specificity 12.9 per cent, so many patients are imaged unnecessarily). In the geriatric subgroup analysis (2,943 patients aged 65 and over), the injury rate was doubled (4.59 per cent versus 2.19 per cent) with the odontoid fractures over-represented (20 per cent versus 5 per cent), and the instrument was 100 per cent sensitive (95 per cent CI 97.1–100 per cent) for the clinically significant injury with a comparable imaging reduction — so the rule can be applied safely, but the threshold for the CT remains low. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is an alternative that was more sensitive (99.4 per cent versus 90.7 per cent) and more specific (45.1 per cent versus 36.8 per cent) head-to-head, missing 1 versus 16 important injuries. The CT is now the standard imaging for the high-risk patient, replacing the plain radiographs.[2][1][3][4]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Touger M, Gennis P, Nathanson N, et al. Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med, 2002.PMID 12192352
- [2]Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10891516
- [3]Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 14695411
- [4]Brown CV, Foulkrod KH, Reifsnyder A, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the cervical spine: how many slices do you need? Am Surg, 2010.PMID 20420244