Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasSecondary survey

EM Vivas · Secondary survey

Cervical spine clearance — the NEXUS criteria

A clinical viva on the NEXUS criteria for cervical-spine clearance.

clinical2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
Name the five NEXUS criteria for the clinical clearance of the cervical spine in the adult blunt-trauma patient, and describe the limitations of the rule.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

The five NEXUS criteria for the clinical clearance of the cervical spine are: (1) no midline cervical tenderness, (2) no focal neurological deficit, (3) a normal level of alertness (a fully awake and oriented patient, not intoxicated), (4) no intoxication (no alcohol, no drugs, no metabolic), and (5) no painful distracting injury (no long-bone fracture, no large laceration, no thermal injury that would distract the patient from the cervical-spine pain). All five must be met to clear the cervical spine clinically; the failure of any one mandates the imaging.[2] The limitations are that the NEXUS criteria have a high sensitivity but a lower specificity (the derivation specificity 12.9 per cent, so many patients are imaged unnecessarily). In the geriatric subgroup analysis (2,943 patients aged 65 and over), the injury rate was doubled (4.59 per cent versus 2.19 per cent) with the odontoid fractures over-represented (20 per cent versus 5 per cent), and the instrument was 100 per cent sensitive (95 per cent CI 97.1–100 per cent) for the clinically significant injury with a comparable imaging reduction — so the rule can be applied safely, but the threshold for the CT remains low. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is an alternative that was more sensitive (99.4 per cent versus 90.7 per cent) and more specific (45.1 per cent versus 36.8 per cent) head-to-head, missing 1 versus 16 important injuries. The CT is now the standard imaging for the high-risk patient, replacing the plain radiographs.[2][1][3][4]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Touger M, Gennis P, Nathanson N, et al. Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med, 2002.PMID 12192352
  2. [2]Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10891516
  3. [3]Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 14695411
  4. [4]Brown CV, Foulkrod KH, Reifsnyder A, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the cervical spine: how many slices do you need? Am Surg, 2010.PMID 20420244
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCerebrospinal fluid interpretation — the data vivaCerebrospinal fluid interpretationNextCholangitis vs cholecystitis — TG18 and source controlBiliary disease — colic, cholecystitis, cholangitis