EM Vivas · Pulmonary oedema
Pulmonary oedema — the cardiogenic versus the non-cardiogenic
A clinical viva on the cardiogenic-vs-ARDS distinction and the management.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
The cardiogenic versus the non-cardiogenic — confirm mechanism/fluid/heart/BNP/echo discriminators and cause lists against local respiratory teaching; the held review covers NIV/CPAP in cardiogenic oedema (reduced venous return and LV afterload, lower filling pressure, improved vitals/physiology, less intubation and mortality versus conventional oxygen).[2]
The management of the cardiogenic:
- The upright position, the high-flow oxygen — per local protocol.
- The CPAP (or BiPAP if hypercapnic) — reduces venous return and LV afterload, improves vitals and physiology, decreases intubation and mortality versus conventional oxygen.[2]
- The IV GTN — confirm dose against local protocol.
- The IV furosemide — confirm dose against local protocol.
- The treat-the-cause (PCI, rate control, valve) — per local protocol.
- The high-dependency or the intensive care — per local disposition protocol.
[3]The principles: cardiogenic hydrostatic versus ARDS permeability — CPAP/NIV scope is held-review evidence[2]; vasodilator, diuretic, cause-treatment and ventilation specifics per local protocol. Morphine scope: held systematic review found mostly unfavourable results without a focused RCT — confirm use against local protocol.[3]
References2ShowHide
- [2]Bello G, De Santis P, Antonelli M Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Ann Transl Med, 2018.PMID 30370282
- [3]Gil V, Domínguez-Rodríguez A, Masip J, et al. Morphine Use in the Treatment of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema and Its Effects on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Review Curr Heart Fail Rep, 2019.PMID 31183779