Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasDeliberate self-harm and risk assessment

EM Vivas · Deliberate self-harm and risk assessment

Self-harm risk assessment — medical first then structure

Clinical viva on DSH sequence, risk formulation and safety planning.

clinical1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A young adult presents after a mixed overdose and says they still want to die. Discuss sequence of care, components of structured suicide risk assessment, limits of scoring tools, and disposition tiers including means restriction.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

Sequence: medical stabilisation and antidotes first (paracetamol level/NAC, ECG, gas, glucose) — confirm sequence against local toxicology protocol. Do not complete psychosocial risk assessment while intoxicated — observe until sober enough for reliable history, per local psychiatry-ED protocol.

Structured interview: ideation (intensity/frequency), plan (specificity/lethality), intent (now vs at time of act), access to means, protective factors, triggers, psychiatric history. Prior attempt history is a studied reattempt risk factor in the held meta-analysis.[1]

Tools: SAD PERSONS shows high specificity but low sensitivity (nearly half of the suicide group classified low-risk) — structured clinical judgement drives disposition, not a score alone.[3]

Disposition: high (active intent + plan + means) → admit, 1:1, means removal, consider MHA; moderate → urgent psychiatry before leave + safety plan; lower risk with strong supports → safety plan, crisis contacts, rapid community follow-up. Safety-planning interventions are supported for reducing ideation/behaviours and hospitalization in the held review.[2] Confirm tiers against local psychiatry-ED protocol.

Means restriction: firearms, stockpiled medicines, ligature risks — confirm the key steps against local psychiatry-ED protocol.

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Pemau A, Marin-Martin C, Diaz-Marsa M, et al. Risk factors for suicide reattempt: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 2024.PMID 38623694
  2. [2]Rainbow E, et al. Safety planning interventions to address suicidality in adults: a systematic review of the methodological characteristics of safety planning effectiveness research. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2026.PMID 41424118
  3. [3]Sanz-Gómez S, et al. Predictive validity of the SAD PERSONS and NO HOPE scales in a sample of suicide cases. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025.PMID 40342345
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSAAG, Light criteria, and safe tapsParacentesis and thoracentesisNextSentinel injuries and mandatory reportingMandatory reporting and child protection