Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Derm CasesDermatology / Paediatrics / Infectious Disease

Derm Cases · Dermatology / Paediatrics / Infectious Disease

OSCE — fever and rash in a child: pattern recognition of viral exanthems

An 8-minute OSCE station on distinguishing measles, rubella, roseola, erythema infectiosum and hand-foot-mouth disease, identifying dangerous mimics (Kawasaki, meningococcaemia, SJS), public-health actions for measles, and supportive care with red-flag escalation.

8 minosce2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE station on distinguishing measles, rubella, roseola, erythema infectiosum and hand-foot-mouth disease, identifying dangerous mimics (Kawasaki, meningococcaemia, SJS), public-health actions for measles, and supportive care with red-flag escalation.

Brief (to candidate)

A 3-year-old presents with 4 days of fever, cough, coryza and conjunctivitis; today a cephalocaudal morbilliform rash appeared. Immunisation status is incomplete. A second vignette card shows alternatives (defervescence then rash; slapped cheek; oral–hand–foot vesicles). You have 8 minutes to identify the likely exanthem, exclude dangerous mimics, and plan isolation, supportive care and public-health steps.

[9]

Candidate instructions

  1. Use prodrome + day of rash + distribution + enanthem to pattern-match classic viral exanthems.
  2. State the measles triad (3 Cs + Koplik) and notification/PEP actions.
  3. Differentiate roseola, fifth disease, rubella, HFMD.
  4. List dangerous mimics that must not be missed.
  5. Outline supportive care and specific red-flag escalations (vitamin A, pregnancy risk, aplastic crisis).
[8]

Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)

DomainKey actions expected
Measles patternProdrome of cough, coryza, conjunctivitis; Koplik spots; rash day 3–4 spreading cephalocaudal; incomplete MMR → high suspicion; notifiable[1]
Key differentialsRoseola (HHV-6): high fever in relatively well infant, rash as fever defervesces; rubella: postauricular lymphadenopathy, milder illness, congenital risk; erythema infectiosum (B19): slapped cheek then lacy limbs; HFMD: oral ulcers + hand/foot vesicles (enterovirus)[2][3][5][7]
Dangerous mimicsMeningococcaemia, Kawasaki disease, drug morbilliform eruption / SJS, toxic shock, scarlet fever — toxicity, non-blanching purpura, prolonged fever, mucosal necrosis
Public health / measles RxIsolate airborne precautions; vitamin A for measles per age dosing in guideline settings; MMR within 72 h for susceptible contacts when indicated; notify public health[1]
Special risksParvovirus B19: pregnancy (fetal hydrops) and aplastic crisis in haemolytic disorders; varicella in pregnancy/neonate/immunocompromised (not primary vignette but if asked); HFMD neurological red flags
Supportive careHydration, antipyretics (avoid aspirin in viral illness with Reye risk discussion if relevant), return precautions for respiratory distress, encephalitis, poor feeding
CommunicationExplain expected course of benign exanthems vs when to re-attend; vaccine catch-up counselling without blame

Model key actions

  • Identify classic measles from 3 Cs + Koplik + cephalocaudal timing and initiate isolation/notification ± vitamin A.[1]
  • Rapidly distinguish roseola / fifth disease / rubella / HFMD by timing and morphology.[2][3][5][7]
  • Explicitly exclude life-threatening non-viral mimics before discharging a “simple viral rash”.

Common errors

  • Calling every morbilliform rash “measles” without prodrome/enanthem analysis.
  • Discharging incomplete-immunisation measles without public-health notification.
  • Missing pregnancy counselling for rubella/parvovirus exposures.
[1]
  • Overlooking Kawasaki / meningococcal toxicity cues.
  • Unnecessary antibiotics for classic self-limited viral exanthems.
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Hübschen JM, Gouandjika-Vasilache I, Dina J. Measles. Lancet, 2022.PMID 35093206
  2. [2]Winter AK, Moss WJ. Rubella. Lancet, 2022.PMID 35367004
  3. [3]Leung AKC, Lam JM, Barankin B, et al. Erythema Infectiosum: A Narrative Review. Current Pediatric Reviews, 2024.PMID 37132144
  4. [5]Leung AK, Lam JM, Barankin B, et al. Roseola Infantum: An Updated Review. Current Pediatric Reviews, 2024.PMID 36411550
  5. [7]Leung AKC, Lam JM, Barankin B, et al. Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease: A Narrative Review. Recent Advances in Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery, 2022.PMID 36284392
  6. [8]Lievano F, Galea SA, Thornton M, et al. Measles, mumps, and rubella virus vaccine (M-M-R II): a review of 32 years of clinical and postmarketing experience Vaccine, 2012.PMID 22959986
  7. [9]Su SB, Chang HL, Chen AK. Current Status of Mumps Virus Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020.PMID 32150969
PreviousOSCE — fever and non-blanching rash: meningococcaemia and purpura fulminansDermatology / Emergency Medicine / Infectious Diseases / PaediatricsNextOSCE — fever and tender red plaques: diagnose Sweet syndrome and screen for malignancyDermatology / Haematology / Internal medicine