Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Derm CasesDermatology / Surgical oncology

Derm Cases · Dermatology / Surgical oncology

OSCE — non-healing keratotic nodule: cutaneous SCC risk features, biopsy and treatment pathway

An 8-minute OSCE station on invasive cutaneous SCC recognition, high-risk features (site, depth, PNI, immunosuppression), biopsy, surgical margins/Mohs concepts, and advanced-disease options.

8 minosce2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE station on invasive cutaneous SCC recognition, high-risk features (site, depth, PNI, immunosuppression), biopsy, surgical margins/Mohs concepts, and advanced-disease options.

Brief (to candidate)

A 72-year-old man on long-term immunosuppression after renal transplant presents with a tender, crusted, hyperkeratotic nodule on the lower lip that has enlarged over 3 months. He has extensive actinic damage on the face and hands. You have 8 minutes to assess risk, plan diagnosis and outline management.

[8]

Candidate instructions

  1. Recognise suspected invasive cutaneous SCC and its precursors (AK, Bowen).
  2. List high-risk features relevant to this case (lip, transplant, rapid growth).
  3. Plan biopsy and staging concepts (AJCC / Brigham high-risk features).
  4. Outline surgical management (margins vs Mohs) and when to image for perineural disease.
  5. Address immunosuppression modification and field care.
  6. Mention advanced options (radiotherapy, anti-PD-1) at high level.
[6]

Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)

DomainKey actions expected
RecognitionNon-healing hyperkeratotic/crusted/ulcerated nodule on UV-damaged skin; spectrum AK → Bowen (SCC in situ) → invasive SCC[1][2]
High-risk featuresLip/ear/scalp/mask-face site; diameter ≥2 cm; depth/invasion; poor differentiation; perineural invasion; recurrence; immunosuppression/transplant; Marjolin context if chronic wound[2][6]
InvestigationsFull-thickness biopsy for histology; examine regional nodes; MRI if neuropathic pain/numbness (PNI suspicion)[1][3]
Staging conceptsAJCC 8th and Brigham (BWH) systems use high-risk features to predict metastasis risk (~3–5% overall; higher in high-risk/transplant)[2][6]
SurgeryLow-risk: excision ~4–6 mm margins; high-risk/critical site/recurrent: Mohs preferred; adjuvant RT selected high-risk cases after MDT[1][3]
Special populations / advancedTransplant: intensive surveillance, consider reducing immunosuppression / sirolimus conversion with transplant team; advanced/unresectable: cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) or EGFR-directed options in specialist care; field therapy for in-situ/field cancerization[2][7]
CommunicationUrgent pathway; photoprotection; do not observe progressive lip nodules in immunosuppressed patients

Model key actions

  • Treat progressive lip nodule in a transplant patient as high-risk SCC until proven otherwise.[2]
  • Biopsy promptly; plan margin-controlled surgery (often Mohs at lip) and nodal assessment.[1][3]
  • Coordinate immunosuppression strategy and field UV management with transplant/dermatology teams.[2]

Common errors

  • Prolonged observation of a non-healing keratotic nodule in an immunosuppressed host.
  • Missing perineural red flags (pain, paraesthesia).
  • Using only field creams for clearly invasive clinical disease.
  • Ignoring transplant-specific risk (SCC:BCC ratio inversion, multiple primaries).
  • Incomplete nodal examination and safety-net.
[1] [2] [3]
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Waldman A, Schmults C. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2019.PMID 30497667
  2. [2]Wysong A. Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Skin. New England Journal of Medicine, 2023.PMID 37314707
  3. [3]Jiang R, Fritz M, Que SKT. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review. Cancers, 2024.PMID 38791879
  4. [6]Que SKT, Zwald FO, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and staging. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018.PMID 29332704
  5. [7]Willenbrink TJ, Ruiz ES, Cornejo CM, et al. Field cancerization: Definition, epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020.PMID 32387665
  6. [8]Bavinck JN, Tieben LM, van der Woude FJ. Prevention of skin cancer and reduction of keratotic skin lesions during acitretin therapy in renal transplant recipients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study J Clin Oncol, 1995.PMID 7636533
PreviousOSCE — changing pigmented lesion: melanoma recognition, biopsy and staging pathwayDermatology / Surgical OncologyNextOSCE — rapidly growing painless nodule: Merkel cell carcinoma AEIOU and immunotherapy eraDermatology / Surgical oncology