Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Derm CasesDermatology / Surgical dermatology / Skin cancer

Derm Cases · Dermatology / Surgical dermatology / Skin cancer

OSCE — counsel for Mohs micrographic surgery: indications, margin control, and outcomes

An 8-minute OSCE station on Mohs micrographic surgery indications (H-zone, aggressive histology, recurrence), 100% en face margin control vs bread-loafing, cure rates for BCC/SCC, and counselling on same-day staged excision and reconstruction.

8 minosce2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE station on Mohs micrographic surgery indications (H-zone, aggressive histology, recurrence), 100% en face margin control vs bread-loafing, cure rates for BCC/SCC, and counselling on same-day staged excision and reconstruction.

Brief (to candidate)

A 67-year-old has a biopsy-proven infiltrative BCC on the nasal ala (H-zone). She asks why she cannot “just have it cut out with a big margin” like her previous arm lesion. You have 8 minutes to explain Mohs, when it is indicated, how margin control differs from standard excision, and expected cure rates.

Candidate instructions

  1. Define Mohs micrographic surgery in plain language.
  2. List high-yield indications (site, histology, recurrence, immunosuppression).
  3. Contrast 100% en face frozen-section margins with bread-loaf vertical sectioning.
  4. Quote approximate cure rates for primary/recurrent BCC and primary SCC.
  5. Outline the same-day stages → clear margins → reconstruction pathway.
[1]

Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)

DomainKey actions expected
DefinitionStaged excision where surgeon maps tumour, processes horizontal (en face) frozen sections of the entire peripheral and deep margin, and re-excises only positive areas until clear (tissue-sparing, complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment)[1][3]
IndicationsH-zone face (periorbital, perinasal, periauricular, perioral, ala, nasolabial, helix); recurrent NMSC; aggressive subtypes (infiltrative/morpheaform/micronodular BCC, poorly differentiated SCC, PNI); poorly defined borders; immunosuppression; selected DFSP and other infiltrative tumours where available[1][4][6]
Why not standard WLE aloneBread-loafing samples a small fraction of the margin; subclinical extension at high-risk sites risks incomplete removal and larger reconstruction later[1][3]
OutcomesAmong highest for NMSC: roughly 98–99% primary BCC, 94–96% recurrent BCC, 96–97% primary cutaneous SCC (context-dependent literature figures acceptable if in this range)[1]
Process counsellingLocal anaesthesia; multiple stages same day; waiting between stages; reconstruction only after clear margins; scar/functional risk on face; rare need for further reconstruction
LimitationsNot universal first-line for all low-risk trunk/limb NMSC; melanoma and some tumours need specialised protocols/referral; access may be limited in some systems
Shared decisionAddress cosmesis vs completeness; alternatives (standard excision, radiation, topical for highly selected low-risk) when appropriate

Model key actions

  • Recommend Mohs for H-zone infiltrative BCC because of complete margin control and tissue sparing.[1][4]
  • Explain en face 100% margin vs incomplete bread-loaf sampling.[3]
  • Set realistic cure-rate expectations and same-day reconstruction plan.[1]

Common errors

  • Offering only “wide local excision with 5 mm margin” for H-zone aggressive BCC without discussing Mohs.
  • Claiming Mohs “removes all cancer cells under a microscope before surgery” without describing staged margin mapping.
  • Quoting Mohs as mandatory for every low-risk truncal superficial BCC.
  • Ignoring reconstruction and functional risk on the nose/eyelid.
  • Confusing Mohs with simple frozen section of a random margin slice.
[1] [4] [6]
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Bittner GC, Cerci FB, Kubo EM, et al. Mohs micrographic surgery: a review of indications, technique, outcomes, and considerations. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 2021.PMID 33849752
  2. [3]Golda N, Hruza G. Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Dermatologic Clinics, 2023.PMID 36410982
  3. [4]Marzuka AG, Book SE. Basal cell carcinoma: pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, histopathology, and management. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2015.PMID 26029015
  4. [6]Mullen JT Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Surgical oncology clinics of North America, 2016.PMID 27591501
PreviousOSCE — neonatal blistering: epidermolysis bullosa subtype, IFM, and RDEB SCC riskDermatology / Paediatrics / GenodermatosesNextOSCE — cradle cap: diagnose infantile seborrhoeic dermatitis, counsel gentle care, and spot red flagsDermatology / Paediatrics