Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Derm CasesDermatology / Haematology-oncology

Derm Cases · Dermatology / Haematology-oncology

OSCE — chronic bathing-trunk rash: mycosis fungoides recognition and CTCL pathway

An 8-minute OSCE station on mycosis fungoides as a CTCL mimic of eczema/psoriasis, patch-plaque-tumour progression, biopsy strategy, staging concepts, skin-directed vs systemic therapy, and Sezary red flags.

8 minosce2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE station on mycosis fungoides as a CTCL mimic of eczema/psoriasis, patch-plaque-tumour progression, biopsy strategy, staging concepts, skin-directed vs systemic therapy, and Sezary red flags.

Brief (to candidate)

A 58-year-old man has a 4-year history of pruritic, scaly, poikilodermatous patches in a bathing-trunk distribution that never fully respond to potent topical steroids or phototherapy labelled as “eczema.” New thicker plaques have appeared; no erythroderma. You have 8 minutes to suspect mycosis fungoides, plan diagnosis/staging, and outline stage-based management principles.

[1]

Candidate instructions

  1. Suspect mycosis fungoides (MF) as CTCL’s commonest subtype.
  2. Describe patch → plaque → tumour progression and classic distribution.
  3. Plan biopsy (multiple sites; immunoarchitecture) and key work-up.
  4. Outline TNMB staging concepts at high level.
  5. Match skin-directed vs systemic therapies to early vs advanced disease (EORTC-style thinking).
  6. Flag Sezary syndrome / large-cell transformation red flags.
[2]

Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)

DomainKey actions expected
RecognitionChronic treatment-resistant eczematous/psoriasiform patches often in sun-protected bathing-trunk areas; MF is the great mimicker; may take years and multiple biopsies to diagnose[1][4][6]
Natural historyIndolent progression patch → plaque → tumour ± erythroderma; early MF often excellent prognosis; advanced stages need systemic care
DiagnosisMultiple skin biopsies from representative lesions; dermatopathology with immunophenotype (classically CD4+ epidermotropic T cells with phenotype abnormalities); clinicopathologic correlation essential; consider TCR clonality supportively not in isolation[3][5]
Staging work-upFull skin exam, lymph node exam, blood (Sezary cells / flow if erythrodermic or advanced suspicion), imaging selected by stage; TNMB staging frames therapy
Therapy principlesEarly-stage: skin-directed (topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, topical mechlorethamine/retinoids, local radiotherapy); advanced: systemic options (interferon, retinoids/bexarotene, HDAC inhibitors, antibodies, chemotherapy, allo-HSCT selected) per EORTC consensus specialist pathways[2][5]
Red flagsErythroderma + lymphadenopathy + circulating Sezary cells = Sezary syndrome (urgent haemato-oncology); rapid ulcerating tumours → large-cell transformation; opportunistic infection risk with advanced therapy
CommunicationExplain chronic lymphoma of skin-homing T cells; set expectations for multi-year management and multidisciplinary CTCL clinic

Model key actions

  • Stop labelling chronic bathing-trunk rash as simple eczema — biopsy for MF/CTCL.[4][6]
  • Stage with TNMB mindset and start skin-directed therapy for early disease.[2]
  • Escalate urgently if erythroderma/Sezary features or tumour-stage transformation.[1][3]

Common errors

  • Years of topical steroids without diagnostic re-biopsy of progressive disease.
  • Single inadequate biopsy dismissed as “eczema” forever.
  • Jumping to multi-agent chemotherapy for early patch-stage MF.
  • Missing Sezary syndrome in erythrodermic patients.
  • Not examining nodes or full skin surface.
[2] [3] [4]
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Lee H. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Blood research, 2023.PMID 37105561
  2. [2]Latzka J, Assaf C, Bagot M, et al. EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome - Update 2023. European journal of cancer, 2023.PMID 37890355
  3. [3]Larocca C, Kupper T. Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: An Update. Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2019.PMID 30497668
  4. [4]Sheern C, Levell NJ, Craig PJ, et al. Mycosis fungoides: a review. Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2025.PMID 40721285
  5. [5]Weiner DM, Rook AH. Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma. Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2024.PMID 39079789
  6. [6]Dummer R, Vermeer MH, Scarisbrick JJ, et al. Cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2021.PMID 34446710
PreviousOSCE — choose the right skin biopsy: technique, site, and fixativeDermatology / Procedural skills / Dermatopathology interfaceNextOSCE — chronic perianal itch with white plaquesDermatology / Colorectal