Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Derm CasesDermatology / Occupational Medicine / Allergy

Derm Cases · Dermatology / Occupational Medicine / Allergy

OSCE — assessment of hand contact dermatitis with patch-test planning

An 8-minute OSCE station distinguishing irritant from allergic contact dermatitis, occupational hand eczema assessment, allergen history (nickel and others), ESCD patch-testing principles, and avoidance-centred management with barrier repair.

8 minosce2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLABMRCP
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE station distinguishing irritant from allergic contact dermatitis, occupational hand eczema assessment, allergen history (nickel and others), ESCD patch-testing principles, and avoidance-centred management with barrier repair.

Brief (to candidate)

A 32-year-old nurse has chronic itchy vesicular and fissured dermatitis of both hands for 8 months, worse after shifts with frequent handwashing and glove use. She also develops earlobe and under-ring dermatitis with costume jewellery. Emollients alone help only partially. You have 8 minutes to differentiate ICD vs ACD, plan investigation, and manage occupational hand eczema.

[8]

Candidate instructions

  1. Distinguish irritant (ICD) from allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) mechanistically and clinically.
  2. Take an exposure history (occupation, gloves, cleansers, jewellery, plants, cosmetics).
  3. Explain patch testing indications, timing, and interpretation principles.
  4. Plan avoidance, barrier repair, and topical anti-inflammatory therapy.
  5. Address fitness for work, sick-leave, and prevention.
[8]

Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)

DomainKey actions expected
ICD vs ACDICD: dose-dependent barrier injury from wet work/detergents, burns/stinging early, often dorsal hands/finger webs; ACD: type IV delayed hypersensitivity, may spread beyond contact site, prior sensitisation, re-exposure elicits rash at ~48 h[1][5]
History of exposureWet work, soaps, alcohol rubs, rubber accelerators in gloves, fragrances, preservatives; nickel jewellery pattern (lobes, under rings, jean-stud umbilicus)[11]
ExaminationMorphology (vesicles, fissures, lichenification), laterality, foot/face if relevant, rule out tinea/psoriasis/AD hand variants
Patch testingGold standard for suspected ACD; baseline series ± occupation-specific allergens; apply 48 h, read at 48 and 72–96 h (ESCD best practice); test when acute flare controlled; relevance assessment essential (positive ≠ always causative)[8]
Acute & chronic RxAvoidance is definitive for ACD; ICD: reduce wet work, cotton glove liners, soap substitutes; emollients; short potent topical corticosteroid courses for hands; treat secondary infection if present
Occupational planEmployer advice, barrier measures, possible temporary redeployment; document for occupational health; chronic hand eczema QoL impact
CommunicationExplains delayed reading of patch tests; written allergen avoidance list if positive; safety-net for spreading facial/eyelid dermatitis from transfer

Model key actions

  • Frame dual wet-work ICD + likely nickel ACD (jewellery pattern) in a healthcare worker.[1][5][11]
  • Arrange patch testing with correct timing/reads per ESCD guidance.[8]
  • Emphasise avoidance + barrier repair + topical steroid; occupational prevention plan.

Common errors

  • Treating only with steroids without exposure elimination.
  • Ordering IgE RAST as primary test for contact allergy (patch test is type IV).
  • Patch testing during acute widespread flare or on systemic immunosuppressants without planning.
  • Missing rubber glove allergens in healthcare workers.
  • Diagnosing pure ICD and never considering ACD when pattern suggests specific allergen (nickel).
[1] [5] [11]
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Scheinman PL, Vocanson M, Thyssen JP, et al. Contact dermatitis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2021.PMID 34045488
  2. [5]Bains SN, Nash P, Fonacier L. Irritant Contact Dermatitis. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2019.PMID 30293200
  3. [8]Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis, 2015.PMID 26179009
  4. [11]Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, et al. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis, 2019.PMID 31140194
PreviousOSCE — assessment of facial and scalp seborrhoeic dermatitis with red-flag severityDermatology / General Medicine / Infectious Disease interfaceNextOSCE — assessment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris and isotretinoin counsellingDermatology / Adolescent Medicine