Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio Vivasheart-failure

Cardio Vivas · heart-failure

Decompensated heart failure — structured viva

Structured oral on decompensated heart failure under the 2026 ESC guideline: categories and perfusion, oxygen and NIV, diuretic dosing and escalation, vasoactive drugs, cardiogenic shock with temporary MCS, and the pre-discharge and early follow-up phase.

structured clinical oral5 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

EECCABIM-style clinical judgementUK ST cardiology teaching
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

EECCABIM-style clinical judgementUK ST cardiology teaching
Prompt
The examiner opens: 'A 68-year-old is brought in breathless and wet at 172 systolic. Talk me through the first hours, then what happens if he becomes cold, then discharge.' Practice scenario — not a real patient.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

This scenario is fictional and invented for teaching; it does not describe a real person.

Stem

You are the admitting cardiologist. A 68-year-old man with known HFrEF presents with breathlessness that developed over a few hours: SpO₂ 86% on air, respiratory rate 30 breaths/min, BP 172/98 mmHg, crackles throughout both lungs, lactate 1.6 mmol/L. He takes furosemide 40 mg daily, ramipril and bisoprolol.[1]

Branch A — Category and definition

Examiner: How would you classify this presentation under the 2026 ESC guideline? [1]

Strong answer: The 2026 guideline uses the term decompensated HF instead of acute HF. Its four clinical categories are decompensated left-sided HF, decompensated right-sided HF, acute pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock. This fits acute pulmonary oedema: respiratory distress with hypoxaemia and a respiratory rate above 25 breaths/min, from pulmonary congestion that developed over a short period. In APO the congestion is mainly from fluid redistribution, so such patients usually do not need high doses of diuretics but may need vasodilators.[1]

Examiner (follow-up): What does the term "decompensated" add? [1]

Strong answer: DHF is acute or gradual onset of symptoms or signs severe enough to need urgent attention and new or intensified treatment. In pre-existing HF, worsening HF describes deterioration in symptoms or signs; DHF is specifically characterised by the need for treatment modification.[1]

Branch B — The first hour

Examiner: Give me oxygen, ventilation and diuretic orders. [1] [11]

Strong answer: Oxygen, because SpO₂ is below 90% (Class I, Level C). NIPPV should be considered for respiratory distress and started as soon as possible (Class IIa, Level B2); Cochrane data show NPPV probably reduces intubation (RR 0.49).[1] [11] If he has fluid overload, an i.v. loop diuretic is recommended (Class I, Level A); as he takes a loop diuretic, an i.v. dose of twice his usual oral dose (furosemide 80 mg i.v.) should be considered. APO with predominant fluid redistribution usually does not need high diuretic doses. With SBP above 110 mmHg, an i.v. vasodilator may be considered as initial therapy (Class IIb, Level C), with close blood-pressure monitoring. No routine opiates unless severe or intractable pain or anxiety (Class III, Level C).[1]

Examiner (follow-up): What nitroglycerine regimen would you use? [1]

Strong answer: The ESC 2026 supplement gives a start of 10–20 μg/min, increased up to 200 μg/min, and lists tolerance with continuous use. Its text adds that nitroglycerine can be given as 1–2 mg boluses in severely hypertensive patients with acute pulmonary oedema.[1]

Examiner (follow-up): Do vasodilators change outcome? [13]

Strong answer: ESC 2026 notes that no large-scale RCT has shown a clear benefit of vasodilatation on hard end points. A meta-analysis of 46 RCTs found no mortality reduction (RR 0.95) but less intubation (RR 0.54).[1] [13] The AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline warns that nitroglycerin tachyphylaxis may develop within 24 hours.[2]

Branch C — Diuretic response

Examiner: How do you know the diuretic is working, and what if it is not? [1] [6]

Strong answer: A satisfactory response can be defined as urinary sodium ≥70 mEq/L at 2 h or urine output ≥100 mL/h over the first 6 h. If not, the i.v. loop dose can be doubled and/or a non-loop diuretic added. If 24-hour diuresis is below 3 L and congestion persists, further escalation should be considered on day 2. The highest daily i.v. dose is generally considered to be furosemide 600 mg, although up to 1000 mg may be considered with severely impaired kidney function.[1] If he has fluid overload despite previous loop diuretic treatment, adding short-term acetazolamide 500 mg i.v. once daily or oral hydrochlorothiazide dosed by eGFR should be considered (Class IIa, Level B1). ADVOR increased successful decongestion within 3 days (42.2% versus 30.5%) with no significant difference in death or HF rehospitalisation during 3 months of follow-up.[1] [6]

Examiner (follow-up): Should urinary sodium guide therapy routinely? [8]

Strong answer: ESC 2026 says urinary sodium-guided therapy may be considered during the first days of treatment to improve natriuresis and diuresis (Class IIb, Level B1). PUSH-AHF increased 24-hour natriuresis, with no significant difference in death or HF rehospitalisation at 180 days (31% in both arms).[1] [8]

Branch D — The shock pivot

Examiner: Overnight his BP falls to 80/55 mmHg, his peripheries are cold, he is confused and lactate is 4.8 mmol/L. What now? [1] [15] [16]

Strong answer: This is likely cardiogenic shock, critical end-organ hypoperfusion caused by primary cardiac dysfunction. Septic and hypovolaemic shock also cause hypotension with end-organ hypoperfusion, and mixed forms of shock often exist simultaneously. A lactate above 2 mmol/L (best measured arterially) meets the biochemical requirement for inadequate tissue perfusion. I consult the Shock Team because temporary MCS may be needed.[1] A vasopressor, preferably norepinephrine, may be considered (Class IIb, Level C); in an RCT in patients with shock (De Backer 2010, dopamine versus norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor), arrhythmic events were more frequent with dopamine.[1] [16] With SBP below 90 mmHg and hypoperfusion not responding to standard treatment, including fluid challenge, inotropes may be considered (Class IIb, Level C). Because he takes bisoprolol, levosimendan or a PDE-III inhibitor may be preferred over dobutamine. In cardiogenic shock, a milrinone-versus-dobutamine RCT (Mathew 2021) found no significant difference between milrinone and dobutamine in its primary composite outcome (49% versus 54%).[1] [15]

Examiner (follow-up): Would you put in a balloon pump? [1]

Strong answer: IABP is not recommended in unselected cardiogenic shock (Class III, Level B1). Altshock-2 (routine early IABP in HF-related shock) stopped for futility. For HF-related haemodynamic instability, temporary MCS should be considered in selected patients as a bridge (Class IIa, Level C). A multidisciplinary Shock Team is recommended to guide the device modality and type (Class I, Level C).[1] [21]

Branch E — Discharge

Examiner: He recovers. What must happen before and after discharge? [1] [22]

Strong answer: Start an SGLT2 inhibitor in hospital after stabilisation (Class I, Level B1). Before discharge, carefully evaluate for persistent congestion (Class I, Level C).[1] Then rapidly start and up-titrate FMT before discharge and at frequent visits over the first 6 weeks (Class I, Level B2). STRONG-HF lowered 180-day HF readmission or death from 23.3% to 15.2%.[1] [22] If he has iron deficiency, the pre-discharge phase may also be used to give iron, based on AFFIRM-AHF.[1]

References25ShowHide
  1. [1]Køber L et al. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of heart failure. Eur Heart J, 2026.PMID 42661420
  2. [2]Heidenreich PA et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2022.PMID 35363499
  3. [3]Chioncel O et al. Clinical phenotypes and outcome of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017.PMID 28463462
  4. [4]Chioncel O et al. Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status - impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail, 2019.PMID 31127678
  5. [5]Felker GM et al. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med, 2011.PMID 21366472
  6. [6]Mullens W et al. Acetazolamide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Volume Overload. N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 36027559
  7. [7]Trullàs JC et al. Combining loop with thiazide diuretics for decompensated heart failure: the CLOROTIC trial. Eur Heart J, 2023.PMID 36423214
  8. [8]Ter Maaten JM et al. Natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: a pragmatic randomized trial. Nat Med, 2023.PMID 37640861
  9. [9]Dauw J et al. Protocolized Natriuresis-Guided Decongestion Improves Diuretic Response: The Multicenter ENACT-HF Study. Circ Heart Fail, 2024.PMID 38179728
  10. [10]Voors AA et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial. Nat Med, 2022.PMID 35228754
  11. [11]Berbenetz N et al. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019.PMID 30950507
  12. [12]Bart BA et al. Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 23131078
  13. [13]Lukoschewitz JD et al. Vasodilators for Acute Heart Failure - A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. NEJM Evid, 2024.PMID 38804781
  14. [14]Uhlig K et al. Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020.PMID 33152122
  15. [15]Mathew R et al. Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 34347952
  16. [16]De Backer D et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
  17. [17]Levy B et al. Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018.PMID 29976291
  18. [18]Møller JE et al. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med, 2024.PMID 38587239
  19. [19]Thiele H et al. Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37634145
  20. [20]Thiele H et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22920912
  21. [21]Morici N et al. Early Intra-Aortic Balloon Support for Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2025.PMID 40162941
  22. [22]Mebazaa A et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet, 2022.PMID 36356631
  23. [23]Velazquez EJ et al. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 30415601
  24. [24]Ponikowski P et al. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet, 2020.PMID 33197395
  25. [25]Jondeau G et al. B-CONVINCED: Beta-blocker CONtinuation Vs. INterruption in patients with Congestive heart failure hospitalizED for a decompensation episode. Eur Heart J, 2009.PMID 19717851
PreviousCardiac amyloidosis — vivaheart-failureNextHF comorbidities — vivaheart-failure