Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio SAQsacute-cardiovascular-care

Cardio SAQs · acute-cardiovascular-care

Preoperative cardiac assessment — structured written assessment

Two written scenarios: a patient with coronary disease and diabetes before high-risk surgery (ESC 2022 surgical risk band, ECG and biomarker rows, and the drug rows for a beta-blocker, statin, ACE inhibitor and SGLT-2 inhibitor); and a troponin rise on day 1 after hip replacement (ESC 2022 PMI definition, mortality, work-up row, and the Fifth UDMI 2026 MINS definition).

20 marks30 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
Prompt
Pre-operative tests and drug rows before high-risk surgery, then peri-operative myocardial infarction/injury on day 1

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

SAQ 1 (10 marks)

Practice scenario. A 68-year-old man had PCI for chronic coronary syndrome 4 years ago and has type 2 diabetes managed with metformin and empagliflozin. He also takes bisoprolol, atorvastatin and ramipril, and has no history or signs of heart failure. He is scheduled for elective adrenal resection for a benign adenoma, which ESC 2022 Table 5 places in the high surgical risk band.[1]

  1. What 30 day risk does the ESC 2022 high surgical risk band denote, and what does the surgical risk estimate leave out? (2)[1]
  2. Which pre-operative ECG and biomarker tests does ESC 2022 recommend or advise for him, with class and level? (3)[1]
  3. Give the ESC 2022 Recommendation Table 12 row, with class and level, for each of bisoprolol, atorvastatin, ramipril and empagliflozin. (4)[1]
  4. Give one advantage of hs-cTn T/I over BNP/NT-proBNP that ESC 2022 lists. (1)[1]

Model answers — SAQ 1

  1. High surgical risk is an estimated 30 day risk of CV death, MI and stroke above 5% (1 mark).[1] The estimate is a broad approximation that takes into account only the specific surgical intervention, without considering the patient’s comorbidities (1 mark).[1]
  2. A pre-operative 12-lead ECG is recommended in patients with known CVD or CV risk factors (including age ≥65 years), or symptoms or signs suggestive of CVD, before intermediate- and high-risk NCS (ESC 2022, Class I, Level C) (1 mark).[1] In the same group (known CVD, CV risk factors including age ≥65 years, or symptoms suggestive of CVD), hs-cTn T or hs-cTn I is recommended before intermediate- and high-risk NCS and at 24 h and 48 h afterwards (ESC 2022, Class I, Level B) (1 mark).[1] In the same group, measuring BNP or NT-proBNP before intermediate- and high-risk NCS should be considered (ESC 2022, Class IIa, Level B) (1 mark).[1]
  3. Bisoprolol: peri-operative continuation of beta-blockers is recommended in patients currently receiving them (Class I, Level B) (1 mark).[1] Atorvastatin: in patients already on statins, continuing statins during the peri-operative period is recommended (Class I, Level B) (1 mark).[1] Ramipril: in patients without HF, withholding RAAS inhibitors on the day of NCS should be considered to prevent peri-operative hypotension (Class IIa, Level B) (1 mark).[1] Empagliflozin: it should be considered to interrupt SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy for at least 3 days before intermediate- and high-risk NCS (Class IIa, Level C) (1 mark).[1]
  4. Any one: hs-cTn is more widely available; it is less expensive; if normal, it enables acute MI to be ruled out in the preceding days; or a pre-operative value enables accurate diagnosis of PMI on day 1 after surgery (1 mark).[1]

SAQ 2 (10 marks)

Practice scenario. A 77-year-old woman with known coronary artery disease has an elective total hip replacement. Her pre-operative hs-cTn T was 9 ng/L. On day 1 after surgery it is 41 ng/L; the assay ULN is 14 ng/L.[1] She has no chest pain.[1]

  1. How does ESC 2022 define PMI using troponin, and does she meet it? (2)[1]
  2. If no pre-operative value had been taken, what other troponin patterns does ESC 2022 accept for a reliable diagnosis? (2)[1]
  3. In about what proportion of patients is PMI largely asymptomatic, and what is the overall 30 day mortality in patients developing PMI, according to ESC 2022? (2)[1]
  4. What should detection of PMI trigger, and what ESC 2022 row governs the next step? (2)[1]
  5. How does the Fifth Universal Definition of MI (2026) report that MINS has been defined? (2)[6]

Model answers — SAQ 2

  1. ESC 2022: an absolute increase in hs-cTn of more than the ULN on day 1 or 2 after surgery, compared with the pre-operative level, is defined as PMI (1 mark).[1] Her rise is 32 ng/L against a ULN of 14 ng/L, so she meets the definition (1 mark).[1]
  2. A very high hs-cTn T/I on day 1, for example more than five times the ULN (1 mark).[1] Or a relevant change from day 1 to day 2, an absolute increase or decrease of more than the ULN compared with day 1 (1 mark).[1]
  3. PMI is largely asymptomatic in about 90% of patients and is therefore missed in routine practice without surveillance (1 mark).[1] Overall 30 day mortality in patients developing PMI is about 10% (1 mark).[1]
  4. Detection of PMI should trigger ECG recording and detailed clinical evaluation for PMI work-up and therapy (1 mark).[1] Systematic PMI work-up is recommended to identify the underlying pathophysiology and define therapy (ESC 2022, Class I, Level B) (1 mark).[1]
  5. The Fifth UDMI (2026) reports that MINS has been defined as a subset of PMI in patients in whom myocardial injury was deemed most likely due to myocardial ischaemia (1 mark).[6] That is in the absence of unexpected physiological stress from surgery or evidence of a cardiac non-coronary aetiology (1 mark).[6]
References2ShowHide
  1. [1]Halvorsen S, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J, 2022.PMID 36017553
  2. [6]Mills NL, et al. Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026): On behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Affirmation of Value by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). Glob Heart, 2026.PMID 42666939
PreviousInfarct-related cardiogenic shock — structured written assessmentacute-cardiovascular-careNextMassive PE: thrombolysis versus embolectomy — structured written assessmentpulmonary-circulation