Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio Casesarrhythmias

Cardio Cases · arrhythmias

Wide QRS tachycardia after myocardial infarction — VT case discussion

Practice case: taking a 67-year-old woman with ischaemic cardiomyopathy from an unstable wide QRS tachycardia through cardioversion, reversible-cause and substrate work-up, to the ICD decision and follow-up under the 2022 ESC guideline.

practice case discussion (not a real patient)2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
Prompt
A 67-year-old woman with an anterior myocardial infarction 6 years ago presents with palpitations and light-headedness. ECG: regular wide QRS tachycardia at 190 b.p.m. Blood pressure 78/45 mmHg; she is drowsy. Known heart failure with reduced EF (NYHA class II); previous echocardiogram LVEF 30%. Potassium 3.3 mmol/L.

Objectives

  1. Treat a haemodynamically not-tolerated wide QRS tachycardia as VT and terminate it. [1] [2]
  2. Investigate reversible causes and the substrate. [1]
  3. Make the ICD decision with its ESC class and the trial evidence. [1]
  4. Plan for recurrence. [1]

Candidate brief

You are the cardiology registrar called to the emergency department. In twenty minutes, take the case from the first minute through the ICD decision and follow-up, quoting guideline classes and trial evidence. [1]

Expected actions

  • Recognise that this tachycardia is not haemodynamically tolerated, and treat the wide QRS tachycardia as VT: the default diagnosis should be VT until proven otherwise.[2]
  • Perform immediate synchronised DC cardioversion, the ESC first-line treatment for haemodynamically not-tolerated SMVT (Class I, level B); use an unsynchronised shock if synchronisation is not possible.[1]
  • Avoid intravenous verapamil, which is not recommended in broad QRS tachycardia of unknown mechanism (Class III, level B).[1]
  • After termination, investigate reversible causes such as electrolyte imbalance, ischaemia, hypoxaemia and fever (Class I, level C; the list is not exhaustive), and correct the hypokalaemia, because hypokalaemia may trigger VA.[1]
  • For newly documented VA, a baseline 12-lead ECG, recording of the VA on 12-lead ECG whenever possible, and an echocardiogram are recommended as first-line evaluation (Class I, level C).[1]
  • In the absence of a reversible cause, recommend an ICD for haemodynamically not-tolerated VT (Class I, level A); in CAD, the Table 24 row applies to VF or not-tolerated VT occurring later than 48 h after MI without ongoing ischaemia (Class I, level A).[1]
  • Check the general ICD conditions: an expectation of good-quality survival of more than 1 year (Class I, level C), and evaluate whether she could benefit from CRT-defibrillator (Class I, level C).[1]
  • Ensure optimal medical treatment for her heart failure with reduced EF: ACE-I/ARB/ARNI, MRA, beta-blocker and SGLT2 inhibitor are indicated in all heart failure patients with reduced EF (Class I, level A).[1]
  • Quote the evidence: in AVID, unadjusted overall survival at 3 years was 75.4% with an ICD versus 64.1% with antiarrhythmic drugs.[5] The secondary prevention meta-analysis showed an ICD-versus-amiodarone all-cause death HR of 0.72, and patients with LVEF of 35% or less derived significantly more benefit.[6]
  • Plan for recurrence: in CAD, if recurrent, symptomatic SMVT or ICD shocks for SMVT occur on a beta-blocker, adding oral amiodarone or replacing the beta-blocker with sotalol should be considered (Class IIa, level B). In CAD, if recurrent, symptomatic SMVT or ICD shocks for SMVT occur despite chronic amiodarone, catheter ablation is recommended in preference to escalating AADs (Class I, level B).[1]

Marking

Pass:

  • cardioverts immediately as first-line treatment.
  • treats the wide QRS tachycardia as VT.
  • corrects potassium and searches for reversible causes.
  • states the Class I, level A secondary prevention ICD indication.
  • names ablation as the recommended step in CAD for recurrent, symptomatic SMVT or ICD shocks for SMVT despite chronic amiodarone.
[1] [2]

Fail:

  • gives intravenous verapamil, or delays cardioversion for adenosine, in a hypotensive patient.
  • treats hypokalaemia as the whole explanation and omits the ICD discussion, although ESC says that, despite a possible correctable cause, the need for ICD implantation should be considered based on an individual evaluation of the risk of subsequent VA/SCD.
  • quotes an ICD class without its population.
[1]
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J, 2022.PMID 36017572
  2. [2]Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardiaThe Task Force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2020.PMID 31504425
  3. [5]Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med, 1997.PMID 9411221
  4. [6]Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J, 2000.PMID 11102258
PreviousTypical atrial flutter in a man with COPD — case discussionarrhythmiasNextAnterior STEMI with cardiogenic shock at a regional hospital — case discussionacute-cardiovascular-care