Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio Casesischaemic-heart-disease

Cardio Cases · ischaemic-heart-disease

NSTEMI in an older woman with diabetes and CKD — case discussion

Practice case: a 77-year-old woman with diabetes presenting with chest pain-equivalent symptoms and NSTEMI; ESC 2023 risk tier and timing with the ACC/AHA 2025 contrast, antithrombotic dosing for age and creatinine clearance, and kidney protection at angiography.

practice case discussion (not a real patient)3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
Prompt
A 77-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes presents to a regional hospital with 2 hours of breathlessness and epigastric discomfort. BP 138/80 mmHg, HR 88/min, SpO2 96% on air, chest clear, no murmur. The ECG shows 1 mm horizontal ST depression in V4–V6 without ST elevation. Her hs-troponin meets the rule-in criteria of the ESC 0 h/1 h algorithm for the laboratory assay, with a rise above the sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit on serial testing. Weight 62 kg; creatinine clearance 28 mL/min. The PCI centre can take her for angiography within 24 hours.

Objectives

  1. Recognise NSTE-ACS when the presenting symptoms are chest pain-equivalents.[1]
  2. Assign the ESC 2023 risk tier and invasive timing, and contrast ACC/AHA 2025.[1][2]
  3. Prescribe antithrombotic therapy adjusted for age and kidney function.[1]

Candidate brief

Practice case discussion; this is not a real patient. You are the cardiologist taking the call from the regional doctor. In 15 minutes, give your diagnosis, risk assessment, timing of angiography and drug plan, and explain how her age and kidney function change it.

Expected actions

  • Name the presentation. Dyspnoea and epigastric pain are chest pain-equivalent symptoms, and ESC 2023 says the descriptor "atypical" should be avoided.[1] Patients with diabetes may more often present with non-specific symptoms, which can delay diagnosis.[1]
  • Make the working and final diagnosis. No persistent ST elevation means a working diagnosis of NSTE-ACS.[1] ESC 2023 says a troponin rise and/or fall above the 99th percentile with ischaemic symptoms points to MI under the Fourth UDMI (2018), a framing now dated, and she is ruled in as NSTEMI by the ESC 0 h/1 h algorithm.[1] Under the current Fifth UDMI (2026), spontaneous acute myocardial injury with ischaemic symptoms, new or presumed new ischaemic ECG changes or pathological Q waves, and no alternative acute condition or cardiac procedure as the trigger makes primary MI likely.[29] Her breathlessness, epigastric discomfort and ST depression fit; an acute coronary pathology at angiography, or a new ischaemic-pattern wall motion abnormality or loss of viable myocardium on imaging, would confirm it.[29]
  • Assign risk (ESC 2023). She is stable with no very high-risk feature.[1] Confirmed NSTEMI by the ESC hs-cTn algorithm is a high-risk criterion: early angiography within 24 h should be considered (Class IIa, Level A) and an inpatient invasive strategy is recommended (Class I, Level A).[1]
  • Contrast ACC/AHA 2025. At intermediate or high ischaemic risk, an invasive approach with intent to revascularise is recommended during hospitalisation. A meta-analysis found no mortality benefit with earlier angiography, although GRACE over 140, diabetes, age over 75 and elevated biomarkers favoured it, without significant interaction tests.[2]
  • Do not let age or CKD block angiography. ESC 2023: older adults should, in general, have the same strategies, including invasive angiography (Class I, Level B); CKD patients should have the same strategies, although dose adjustment may be necessary (Class I, Level C).[1] Observational data suggest a better prognosis with early revascularisation than medical therapy alone in moderate to severe CKD.[1]
  • Aspirin and P2Y12. Aspirin loading 150–300 mg orally, or 75–250 mg IV if oral ingestion is not possible, then 75–100 mg once daily, with no specific CKD adjustment.[1] No routine P2Y12 pretreatment, because angiography is planned within 24 h (Class III, Level A); give the loading dose at PCI.[1] At age 75 or older prasugrel should be used with caution (5 mg daily if deemed necessary); ESC 2023 says clopidogrel may be considered in older patients, and in POPular AGE (age 70 or older) PLATO major or minor bleeding over 12 months was 18% with clopidogrel vs 24% with ticagrelor.[1][15]
  • Anticoagulant for her kidney function. For early angiography UFH is recommended, with enoxaparin to be considered as an alternative (Class IIa, Level B).[1] If enoxaparin is used with creatinine clearance under 30 mL/min, reduce it to 1 mg/kg SC once daily (ESC 2023).[1]
  • Protect the kidneys at angiography. The antithrombotic type and dose and the contrast volume should be considered based on kidney function, and low- or iso-osmolar contrast at the lowest possible volume is recommended (ESC 2023; Class I, Level A). Hydration during and after angiography should be considered in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (Class IIa, Level B).[1] Use radial access, which ESC 2023 recommends as the standard approach unless there are overriding procedural considerations (Class I, Level A).[1]
  • Check glucose. ESC 2023 recommends assessing glycaemic status at initial evaluation in all patients with ACS (Class I, Level B).[1]

Marking

Pass:

  • Names dyspnoea and epigastric pain as chest pain-equivalents and reaches NSTEMI.[1]
  • Places her in the ESC 2023 high-risk tier and arranges inpatient angiography, considered within 24 h.[1]
  • Avoids routine P2Y12 pretreatment and adjusts enoxaparin, if used, for creatinine clearance under 30 mL/min.[1]
  • Addresses contrast volume and hydration for CKD.[1]

Fail:

  • Withholds angiography because of age or CKD alone.[1]
  • Gives full-dose twice-daily enoxaparin despite creatinine clearance under 30 mL/min.[1]
  • Pretreats with prasugrel before the anatomy is known.[1][13]
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Byrne RA, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2023.PMID 37622654
  2. [2]Rao SV, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2025.PMID 40014670
  3. [13]Montalescot G, et al. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23991622
  4. [15]Gimbel M, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2020.PMID 32334703
  5. [29]Mills NL, Newby LK, Zaman S, et al. Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026). Glob Heart, 2026.PMID 42666939
PreviousLow-risk acute chest pain, then stable symptoms — case discussionischaemic-heart-diseaseNextOlder woman on DAPT after NSTEMI: bleeding risk, surgery and a bleed — case discussionischaemic-heart-disease