Cardio Cases · imaging-noninvasive
Posterior myocardial infarction behind anteroseptal ST depression — case discussion
Practice case: a 61-year-old woman with ongoing chest pain and ST depression in V1–V3 without ST elevation; the ACC/AHA 2025 and Fifth UDMI (2026) ST depression criteria, when to record posterior leads and how ESC 2023 and the Fifth UDMI read them, recognition of posterior myocardial infarction as an ACOMI pattern, and the guideline rows on ECG timing, monitoring, extra leads and repeat ECGs.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
- EECC
- ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
- consultant-call scenario
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ACS | acute coronary syndrome |
| ACOMI | acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction |
| STEMI | ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
| NSTE-ACS | non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
| STE / STD | ST-segment elevation / ST-segment depression |
| FMC | first medical contact |
| MI | myocardial infarction |
| UDMI | Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction |
| COR / LOE | class of recommendation / level of evidence |
| ESC | European Society of Cardiology |
| ACC/AHA | American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association |
| NHFA/CSANZ | National Heart Foundation of Australia / Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand |
Scenario
Practice case (not a real patient). A 61-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with 45 minutes of ongoing central chest pain. She is haemodynamically stable. Her first 12-lead ECG shows 1 mm horizontal ST depression in V1–V3 with positive terminal T waves and no ST elevation in any standard lead. There is no LVH or bundle branch block, and no previous ECG is available.
1. The first ten minutes
- Record and read the ECG at once: ESC 2023 recommends 12-lead ECG recording and interpretation as soon as possible at the point of FMC, with a target of under 10 min (Class I, Level B).[1] ACC/AHA 2025 in-hospital assessment: in suspected ACS, acquisition and interpretation of an ECG within 10 minutes is recommended to help guide management (COR 1, LOE B-NR); NHFA/CSANZ 2025: in people presenting with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of ACS, record and assess an ECG for evidence of ACOMI within 10 min of first clinical contact (Consensus).[2][4]
- Monitor her: ESC 2023 recommends continuous ECG monitoring and defibrillator capacity as soon as possible in suspected ACS with other ECG changes or ongoing chest pain (Class I, Level B).[1] NHFA/CSANZ 2025 recommends continuous monitoring and defibrillator availability with ongoing ischaemic symptoms while assessment for ACOMI continues (strong recommendation, low certainty).[4]
2. Reading the first ECG
- No lead shows ST elevation, so the classic cut-points (≥1 mm outside V2–V3; ≥1.5 mm in V2–V3 for a woman) are not met.[1][2]
- Her ST depression still counts: if new or presumed new, 1 mm horizontal ST depression in V1–V3 meets the ACC/AHA 2025 Table 3 NSTE-ACS criterion of new or presumed new, usually dynamic, horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥0.5 mm in ≥2 contiguous leads.[2] The Fifth UDMI (2026) likewise says new horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥0.5 mm and/or T-wave inversion >1 mm in two contiguous leads is suggestive of myocardial ischaemia.[12]
- Do not stop there. ESC 2023: ST depression in V1–V3, especially when the terminal T wave is positive, is highly suggestive of posterior coronary occlusion, often of the left circumflex artery.[1] ACC/AHA 2025: ST depression in V1-V3 could indicate an evolving posterior STEMI and should be managed with a high index of suspicion, with a posterior lead ECG if warranted.[2]
3. Posterior leads
- ACC/AHA 2025 Table 3: posterior leads (V7–V9) should be obtained in patients with suspected left circumflex occlusion, particularly in the setting of isolated ST depression ≥0.5 mm in V1–V3.[2] ESC 2023 recommends additional ECG leads (V3R, V4R and V7–V9) if total vessel occlusion is suspected and standard leads are inconclusive (Class I, Level B).[1]
- The posterior ECG shows 1 mm ST elevation in V8 and V9. ESC 2023 says ST elevation in V7–V9 is highly suggestive of posterior coronary occlusion (often the left circumflex artery), and the Fifth UDMI (2026) says a posterior MI suggested by ST depression ≥1 mm in V1, V2 and/or V3 (particularly with a dominant R wave in V1 or V2) is confirmed by ST elevation in the posterior leads V7 to V9.[1][12] Fourth UDMI (2018), not restated in the Fifth (history): it had recommended a 0.5 mm ST elevation cut-off in V7–V9 (≥1 mm in men under 40).[5]
4. What this means for her
- Posterior MI is one of the ACOMI patterns NHFA/CSANZ 2025 names beyond the traditional ST elevation criteria, and recognising these patterns should prompt urgent consultation with cardiology services for consideration of reperfusion strategy.[4] People with symptoms and ECG changes consistent with ACOMI require urgent reperfusion, and a clinical decision pathway should not be used (NHFA/CSANZ 2025, strong recommendation, very low certainty).[4] ESC 2023: ST elevation is the most sensitive sign of ongoing coronary occlusion, but other ECG findings can suggest ongoing coronary occlusion (or severe ischaemia); if they are present, prompt triage for immediate reperfusion therapy is indicated.[1]
- The choice and timing of reperfusion are taught in STEMI: reperfusion strategy.
5. If the posterior leads had been negative
- Her initial ECG would still show ST depression in V1–V3, and the 2021 AHA/ACC chest pain guideline says that if ST depression is identified on the initial ECG, management should follow the NSTE-ACS guidelines; that pathway is taught in NSTE-ACS management.[3]
- Her symptoms are persisting, so record further ECGs: NHFA/CSANZ 2025 recommends recording and assessing additional ECGs if symptoms persist, change or recur, or there is diagnostic uncertainty (Consensus), and ESC 2023 recommends an additional 12-lead ECG with recurrent symptoms or diagnostic uncertainty (Class I, Level C).[4][1] ACC/AHA 2025 says the timing of repeat ECGs should be guided by symptoms, especially recurrent chest pain, and any change in clinical condition.[2]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Byrne RA, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2023.PMID 37622654
- [2]Rao SV, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2025.PMID 40013746
- [3]Gulati M, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021.PMID 34756653
- [4]Brieger DB, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guideline for Diagnosing and Managing Acute Coronary Syndromes 2025. Med J Aust, 2026.PMID 41693087
- [5]Thygesen K, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation, 2018.PMID 30571511
- [12]Mills NL, et al. Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026): On behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Affirmation of Value by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). Glob Heart, 2026.PMID 42666939