Anaes · Physiology
Distribution, clearance and half-life
Also known as Volume of distribution · Clearance · Elimination half-life · Elimination rate constant · Loading dose · Maintenance infusion · Steady state · Context-sensitive half-time · Bioavailability
Distribution, clearance and half-life are the three pharmacokinetic parameters that govern how much drug to give, how often to give it, how long it takes to reach steady state, and how quickly it wears off. The framework rests on eight exam-critical ideas. First, the body can be modelled as a single compartment in which the drug distributes instantaneously and is eliminated by first-order kinetics (a constant FRACTION, not a constant amount, removed per unit time), giving an exponential concentration-time decline and a half-life of 0.693 divided by the elimination rate constant. Second, intravenous anaesthetic drugs behave as TWO or more compartments: a central (vessel-rich, blood and well-perfused tissues) compartment into which the drug is injected and from which it is sampled, and a peripheral compartment into which it distributes; the concentration-time curve therefore shows a steep distribution phase (alpha) followed by a slower elimination phase (beta), described by the transfer rate constants k12, k21 and k10. Third, the volume of distribution Vd equals dose divided by the initial concentration and is an apparent, not a real, volume: lipid-soluble tissue-bound drugs (thiopental, propofol, fentanyl) have Vd of many litres per kilogram, whereas polar muscle relaxants stay in extracellular fluid with Vd around 0.1 to 0.3 L per kg. Fourth, clearance CL is the volume of blood plasma completely cleared of drug per unit time, equals the rate of elimination divided by the concentration, and equals Vd times the elimination rate constant; hepatic clearance is liver blood flow times the extraction ratio, separating drugs into flow-dependent (high extraction: morphine, lignocaine, propranolol) and capacity-dependent (low extraction: diazepam, warfarin, theophylline) classes. Fifth, the elimination half-life equals 0.693 times Vd divided by CL, steady state is reached in about five half-lives, and the loading dose equals Vd times the target concentration while the maintenance rate equals CL times the target concentration. Sixth, the context-sensitive half-time (Hughes 1992) is the time for the plasma concentration to fall by 50 per cent AFTER stopping an infusion designed to hold a constant concentration; it rises with infusion duration for fentanyl and thiopental as the peripheral compartment fills and redistribution slows, but stays essentially flat at about three minutes for remifentanil because non-specific esterases metabolise it independently of organ blood flow. Seventh, bioavailability F is the fraction of the administered dose reaching the systemic circulation unchanged: it is one for intravenous drugs and less than one for oral drugs because of first-pass hepatic and gut-wall metabolism. Eighth, the clinical relevance is direct: target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil is built on compartment models, and the context-sensitive half-time explains why remifentanil allows rapid, predictable recovery regardless of infusion duration. Built on the foundational clearance papers (Rowland, Benet and Graham 1973; Wilkinson and Shand 1975; Pang and Rowland 1977; Benet 2010), the opioid pharmacokinetic analysis (Shafer and Varvel 1991), the context-sensitive half-time paper (Hughes, Glass and Jacobs 1992), the remifentanil pharmacokinetic study (Egan 1993), the measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil (Kapila 1995), and the propofol pharmacokinetic models used in target-controlled infusion (Marsh 1991; Schnider 1999).
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- First-order elimination removes a constant FRACTION of the drug per unit time (not a constant amount) — the AMOUNT eliminated falls as the concentration falls, giving an exponential decline. Zero-order removes a constant amount (e.g. phenytoin, ethanol at high dose) and gives a linear decline.
- t1/2 equals 0.693 times Vd divided by CL — so a large Vd (fat-soluble, tissue-bound drug) or a small CL (renal or hepatic impairment) both LENGTHEN the half-life. A drug can have a huge Vd yet a short duration if its clearance is high.
- Steady state takes about FIVE half-lives to reach (94 per cent at 4 half-lives, 97 per cent at 5, 99 per cent at 7). For propofol (t1/2 30 to 60 min) this is hours; for diazepam (t1/2 about 43 h) this is over a week — hence the loading dose.
- Loading dose equals Vd times target concentration; maintenance rate equals CL times target concentration. The first fills the tank; the second matches the drain.
- The elimination half-life is a poor predictor of recovery after an infusion. The CONTEXT-SENSITIVE HALF-TIME is the relevant measure: it rises with infusion duration for thiopental, fentanyl and even alfentanil, but stays flat at about 3 minutes for remifentanil regardless of infusion duration.
- Hepatic clearance equals liver blood flow times the extraction ratio. High-extraction drugs (morphine, lignocaine, propranolol) are FLOW-limited — anything that cuts cardiac output or hepatic blood flow (shock, heart failure, positive-pressure ventilation, portosystemic shunting) cuts their clearance. Low-extraction drugs (diazepam, warfarin, theophylline) are CAPACITY-limited — enzyme capacity and protein binding govern clearance.
Meet the patient
A 70-year-old has just finished a four-hour bowel resection run on a propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion. Within ten minutes of stopping, she opens her eyes, breathes, and lifts her head. The previous case on the same list — a thiopental and fentanyl technique of identical duration — took two hours to wake. Same pharmacology textbook, completely different wake-up.[6]
That contrast is the whole topic in one list: a bolus and an infusion are governed by different clocks, and the clock that matters after an infusion is the context-sensitive half-time, not the elimination half-life. Hold the image of those two wake-ups, and every equation below earns its keep.[5][6]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Wilkinson GR, Shand DG. Commentary: a physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1975.PMID 1164821
- [2]Rowland M, Benet LZ, Graham GG. Clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics J Pharmacokinet Biopharm, 1973.PMID 4764426
- [3]Pang KS, Rowland M. Hepatic clearance of drugs. II. Experimental evidence for acceptance of the well-stirred model over the parallel tube model using lidocaine in the perfused rat liver in situ preparation J Pharmacokinet Biopharm, 1977.PMID 599412
- [4]Benet LZ. Clearance (née Rowland) concepts: a downdate and an update J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn, 2010.PMID 21113650
- [5]Shafer SL, Varvel JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection Anesthesiology, 1991.PMID 1824743
- [6]Hughes MA, Glass PSA, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs Anesthesiology, 1992.PMID 1539843
- [7]Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, et al. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers Anesthesiology, 1993.PMID 7902032
- [8]Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, et al. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil Anesthesiology, 1995.PMID 7486182
- [9]Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children Br J Anaesth, 1991.PMID 1859758
- [10]Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics Anesthesiology, 1999.PMID 10360845