Anaes · Applied cardiovascular & respiratory physiology
Cardiac output & its determinants
Also known as Cardiac output · Cardiac index · Fick principle · Venous return · Mean systemic filling pressure · Guyton curves
Cardiac output — about 5 litres per minute at rest — is the product of heart rate and stroke volume, but in the steady state it is set equally by the venous return the circulation delivers to the heart. The framework rests on five exam-critical ideas: cardiac output equals heart rate times stroke volume, and the cardiac index normalises it to body surface area; the Fick principle measures cardiac output from oxygen consumption and the arteriovenous oxygen difference; heart rate is the autonomic lever on cardiac output, but tachycardia beyond an optimum cuts diastolic filling and lowers stroke volume; stroke volume is governed by preload, afterload and contractility (see the cardiac-cycle topic); and, in Guyton's framework, cardiac output equals venous return in the steady state, and the operating point is the intersection of the cardiac function curve and the venous return curve, set by the mean systemic filling pressure. Built on the venous-return and mean-systemic-filling-pressure review (Persichini 2022), the determinants-of-systemic-blood-flow review (Joyce 2020), the venous-return physics review (Brengelmann 2019), and three cardiac-output-measurement papers comparing thermodilution and the Fick method (Flick 2026 BJA, Rivera-Robles 2025, Abualsaud 2024), and the levosimendan-versus-dobutamine survival trial (SURVIVE 2007).
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Cardiac output equals venous return in the steady state — the heart cannot pump what the venous system does not deliver, which is why venodilatation, vasodilatation and positive-pressure ventilation (all reducing venous return) lower cardiac output regardless of cardiac function.
- Tachycardia raises cardiac output only up to a point: beyond about 150 to 170 beats per minute the shortened diastole cuts filling so much that stroke volume and cardiac output fall — the mechanism of haemodynamic collapse in uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia.
- Mean systemic filling pressure (about 7 mmHg) is the upstream pressure driving venous return; it falls with vasodilatation and venodilatation (anaesthesia, sepsis, neuraxial block) and rises with venoconstriction and fluid, moving the venous return curve and the operating cardiac output with it.
- The Fick method (cardiac output equals oxygen consumption divided by the arteriovenous oxygen difference) is the physiological gold standard, but the indirect estimated Fick commonly overestimates cardiac output compared with thermodilution — assume nothing about an isolated Fick number.
- A high cardiac output does not mean good perfusion: in sepsis and arteriovenous shunting cardiac output is high but oxygen extraction is impaired, so tissue oxygen delivery can still be inadequate.
Meet the patient
A 60-year-old man septic from a urinary source is in intensive care. His cardiac output reads 9 L per min, his SVR is low, his blood pressure is marginal on noradrenaline, and his lactate is rising. The team is divided: is this high output good or bad? The answer lies in the physiology — a high cardiac output with impaired extraction and a falling venous return from vasodilation is not the same as a healthy high output. The heart is pumping fast, but the cells are still starved.[1]
Hold one identity and the whole topic falls into place: in the steady state, cardiac output equals venous return. The heart cannot pump what the veins do not deliver, and the veins cannot return more than the heart accepts. Every anaesthetic intervention — induction, PEEP, neuraxial block, vasopressor, fluid — moves one or both curves on the Guyton diagram.[2]
References7ShowHide
- [1]Persichini R, et al. Venous return and mean systemic filling pressure: physiology and clinical applications Crit Care, 2022.PMID 35610620
- [2]Joyce W, Wang T. What determines systemic blood flow in vertebrates? J Exp Biol, 2020.PMID 32079682
- [3]Brengelmann GL. Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2019.PMID 31518160
- [4]Flick M, et al. Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis Br J Anaesth, 2026.PMID 42230211
- [5]Rivera-Robles J, et al. Post lung-transplant predictive value of thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement JHLT Open, 2025.PMID 40144726
- [6]Abualsaud R, et al. Time to Calm the Fick Down? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thermodilution Compared to Direct Fick in Tricuspid Regurgitation CJC Open, 2024.PMID 39525819
- [7]Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, et al. Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial. JAMA, 2007.PMID 17473298