Anaes Cases · Anaesthesia / physics & measurement — invasive pressure monitoring
Systolic of 240 with a flickering arterial trace — the under-damped arterial line
The hot case — the classic pressure-measurement crisis: an under-damped arterial line producing a spurious systolic hypertension (242 vs the cuff's 148), risking iatrogenic hypotension if an antihypertensive is given. The recognition (the ringing waveform, the cuff discrepancy, the wide pulse pressure), the immediate management (do NOT treat the number; run a fast-flush square-wave test; recognise the many oscillations of under-damping; remove air bubbles, shorten and stiffen the tubing, re-zero and re-level), and the physics that explains why under-damping distorts systolic high and diastolic low but preserves the MEAN — the single most examined pressure-measurement scenario. Includes the comparison with over-damping (slurred, under-read systolic) and the levelling and zeroing checks, and the clinical decision that the true pressure (mean 119, cuff 148/78) does not require an antihypertensive.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Immediate recognition and the physiological diagnosis
This is a monitoring crisis, not primarily a haemodynamic one. The arterial line systolic of 242 mmHg with a flickering, spiky trace is almost certainly spurious — it is the signature of an under-damped arterial line, and the oscillometric cuff at 148/78 is the disconfirming evidence. The wide pulse pressure and the low diastolic are further clues of ringing artefact; the mean is the more trustworthy number from the line while the damping state is confirmed.[2]
The danger is iatrogenic hypotension. If the anaesthetist treats the 242 mmHg — giving an antihypertensive, a vasodilator or deepening the anaesthetic — to bring a pressure down that is not actually there, the patient (with ischaemic heart disease and a carotid stenosis being operated on for stroke prevention) will be rendered hypotensive at exactly the moment cerebral perfusion is most precarious. The first action is therefore to diagnose the damping state before any drug is given.[2]
References3ShowHide
- [1]Gardner RM Direct blood pressure measurement--dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology, 1981.PMID 7469106
- [2]Kleinman B, Powell S, Kumar P The fast flush test measures the dynamic response of the entire blood pressure monitoring system. Anesthesiology, 1992.PMID 1466471
- [3]Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Critical Care, 2002.PMID 12133178