Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM)
Summary
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), also known as degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults over 55 years. It results from compression of the spinal cord due to age-related degenerative changes in the cervical spine, including disc herniation, osteophyte formation, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The clinical presentation is insidious, with characteristic findings of clumsy hands, gait disturbance, and a combination of upper (legs) and lower (arms) motor neurone signs. Diagnosis is confirmed with MRI cervical spine. Surgical decompression is the mainstay of treatment for established myelopathy, as the natural history is one of progressive decline. Conservative management is only appropriate for mild, stable disease with close monitoring.
Key Facts
- Epidemiology: Most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in elderly worldwide
- Aetiology: Degenerative changes causing cervical spinal stenosis and cord compression
- Mean age of onset: 50-60 years; increases with age
- Pathophysiology: Mechanical compression + ischaemia → myelopathy
- Classic presentation: Clumsy hands + spastic gait + mixed UMN/LMN signs
- Key sign: Hoffman's sign (UMN lesion above C5/6)
- Imaging: MRI is gold standard; T2 hyperintensity indicates cord signal change
- Natural history: Progressive deterioration (~20-60% deteriorate without surgery)
- Treatment: Surgical decompression (ACDF, laminectomy, laminoplasty)
- Prognosis: Surgery stabilises/improves in majority; recovery inversely related to duration
Clinical Pearls
"Button Trouble": Difficulty with fine motor tasks like buttoning shirts is a classic early symptom. Ask specifically about hand dexterity — patients often attribute it to arthritis or aging.
"Scissor Legs, Numb Hands": CSM typically causes UMN signs in the legs (spastic paraparesis) and LMN or mixed signs in the arms (wasting at level of compression + UMN below).
"Hoffman's = CSM Until Proven Otherwise": A positive Hoffman's sign (flick middle fingernail → thumb flexes) in a patient with gait problems and hand clumsiness is highly suggestive of cervical myelopathy.
"The Window Closes": Recovery from myelopathy depends on duration. Longer symptom duration before surgery = worse outcomes. Early neurosurgical referral is essential.
"Stepwise Deterioration": CSM often follows a stepwise course — periods of stability punctuated by episodes of decline. Trauma, even minor, can precipitate sudden worsening.
Why This Matters Clinically
CSM is common, underdiagnosed, and treatable. Many elderly patients with gait problems and hand clumsiness are dismissed as having "age-related decline" when they actually have a surgically correctable condition. Recognising the clinical pattern (clumsy hands + spastic gait + UMN signs) and performing the relevant clinical tests (Hoffman's, reflexes, gait) enables timely diagnosis via MRI and referral for surgical consideration.[1,2]
Incidence & Prevalence
| Parameter | Data |
|---|---|
| Prevalence of cervical spondylosis | >90% in adults >60 years (radiological) |
| Symptomatic myelopathy | ~5-10% of those with spondylosis |
| Incidence of CSM | Increasing due to aging population |
| Hospital admissions for DCM | Most common indication for cervical spine surgery |
Demographics
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Age | Most common >55 years; peak 50-70 |
| Sex | Male predominance (2-3:1) |
| Geography | Higher OPLL rates in East Asian populations |
| Trend | Increasing with aging population |
Risk Factors
| Factor | Notes |
|---|---|
| Age | Degenerative changes accumulate |
| Congenital spinal stenosis | Narrow canal predisposes to cord compression |
| OPLL (Ossification of PLL) | More common in East Asian populations |
| Repetitive neck motion | Occupational/sport-related |
| Genetic factors | Collagen gene polymorphisms |
| Trauma | May precipitate acute-on-chronic myelopathy |
Mechanism
Step 1: Degenerative Cervical Changes
- Disc desiccation and height loss with aging
- Disc bulging into spinal canal
- Osteophyte formation at vertebral body margins
- Uncovertebral and facet joint hypertrophy
- Ligamentum flavum buckling/hypertrophy
Step 2: Spinal Canal Narrowing (Stenosis)
- Sagittal canal diameter reduced (<13mm = relative stenosis; <10mm = absolute)
- Dynamic factors: Cord compressed more during neck extension
- Static + dynamic compression exceeds compensatory capacity
- Congenitally narrow canal increases susceptibility
Step 3: Spinal Cord Compression
- Direct mechanical compression of neural tissue
- Compression of anterior spinal artery (ischaemia)
- Venous congestion worsens cord oedema
- Demyelination begins in lateral and posterior columns
Step 4: Cord Pathology
- Wallerian degeneration of ascending and descending tracts
- Anterior horn cell loss (LMN signs at level)
- Lateral corticospinal tract damage (UMN signs below)
- Posterior column damage (proprioceptive loss)
- Gliosis and cavitation in chronic cases
Step 5: Clinical Manifestations
- Hands: Clumsiness (LMN signs at C5-T1)
- Legs: Spastic weakness (UMN corticospinal tract)
- Gait: Spastic ataxic gait (combined pyramidal and sensory)
- Bladder: Late involvement (sphincter control)
Central Cord Syndrome
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Hyperextension injury in stenotic canal; commonly from minor trauma |
| Pattern | Arms weaker than legs; cape distribution sensory loss |
| Reason | "Arms" fibres in central cord affected more than "leg" fibres peripherally |
| Prognosis | Variable; legs recover better than arms |
Symptoms
| Symptom | Notes |
|---|---|
| Hand clumsiness | Difficulty with buttons, writing, handling coins |
| Numbness/paraesthesias in hands | Often bilateral; glove distribution |
| Gait disturbance | Stiff, unsteady gait; balance problems |
| Leg weakness | Difficulty climbing stairs, falls |
| Neck pain | Not always present; axial symptoms variable |
| Lhermitte's sign | Electric shock sensation down spine with neck flexion |
| Bladder dysfunction | Urinary urgency, hesitancy (late sign) |
Signs
Upper Limb Findings:
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Weakness | Typically C5-T1 myotomes; grip weakness |
| Wasting | Intrinsic hand muscles (LMN at level) |
| Reduced reflexes | At level of compression (LMN) |
| Increased reflexes | Below lesion (UMN) — may have inverted biceps reflex |
| Hoffman's sign | Positive = UMN lesion above C5/6 |
| Finger escape sign | Small finger abducts when fingers extended |
Lower Limb Findings:
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Spasticity | Increased tone, clonus |
| Hyperreflexia | Brisk knee and ankle reflexes |
| Upgoing plantars | Babinski positive (UMN) |
| Gait | Spastic ataxic; broad-based; shuffle |
Red Flags
[!CAUTION] Red Flags — Urgent Referral Required:
- Progressive weakness or rapid neurological decline
- Bladder or bowel dysfunction
- Bilateral hand symptoms with gait problems
- Positive Hoffman's sign + gait disturbance
- Trauma in known stenotic canal (central cord syndrome risk)
- Myelopathic symptoms in young patient (consider alternative diagnosis)
Structured Neurological Examination
Upper Limbs:
- Inspection: Wasting (intrinsic hand muscles, C5 wasting)
- Tone: May be normal, spastic, or hypotonic (at level)
- Power: Test each myotome (C5-T1)
- Reflexes: Biceps (C5-6), Triceps (C7), Supinator (C5-6)
- Hoffman's sign: Flick middle fingernail distal phalanx; positive if thumb flexes
- Finger escape sign: Patient extends fingers; small finger abducts
- Sensory: Light touch, pinprick, C5-T1 dermatomes
Lower Limbs:
- Tone: Increased (spastic)
- Power: Hip flexors (L1-2), Knee extension (L3-4), Ankle dorsiflexion (L4-5), Plantarflexion (S1)
- Reflexes: Knee (L3-4), Ankle (S1) — hyperreflexia; sustained clonus
- Plantars: Upgoing (Babinski positive)
- Romberg's test: May be positive (posterior column involvement)
Gait:
- Observe walking: Spastic, stiff-legged, broad-based
- Heel-toe walk: Difficult
- Tandem walking: Impaired
Special Tests
| Test | Technique | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Hoffman's sign | Flick distal phalanx of middle finger | Positive if thumb/index finger flexion (UMN) |
| Inverted biceps reflex | Tap biceps tendon → finger flexion without biceps contraction | UMN lesion above C5; LMN at C5-6 |
| Finger escape sign | Extend fingers with palms down; observe small finger | Abduction = myelopathy |
| Lhermitte's sign | Flex neck → electric sensation down spine | Cervical cord pathology |
| Spurling's test | Extend neck, rotate, apply axial load | Radiculopathy; not myelopathy-specific |
First-Line Investigations
| Investigation | Purpose | Expected Findings |
|---|---|---|
| MRI Cervical Spine | Gold standard | Cord compression; T2 hyperintensity (myelomalacia); canal stenosis |
| X-ray Cervical Spine | Assess alignment, osteophytes | Disc space narrowing, osteophytes, alignment |
MRI Findings
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Cord compression | Visible indentation of spinal cord |
| T2 hyperintensity (cord signal change) | Indicates myelomalacia; poorer prognosis |
| T1 hypointensity | Chronic gliosis/cavitation; worse prognosis |
| Disc herniation | Contributing to compression |
| Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy | Posterior compression |
| OPLL | Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament |
Additional Investigations
| Investigation | Indication |
|---|---|
| CT Cervical Spine | Bone detail (OPLL, osteophytes); surgical planning |
| CT Myelogram | If MRI contraindicated |
| Nerve Conduction Studies/EMG | Distinguish from peripheral nerve pathology |
| VEPs/SEPs | Objective cord function assessment (rarely used clinically) |
Management Algorithm
CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLINICAL ASSESSMENT │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ➤ History: Hand clumsiness, gait problems, falls, bladder │
│ ➤ Examination: Hoffman's, reflexes, gait, power, sensation │
│ ➤ Severity scoring: mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic │
│ Association) score │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MRI CERVICAL SPINE │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ➤ Confirm cord compression │
│ ➤ Assess level(s) of stenosis │
│ ➤ T2 signal change = cord damage │
│ ➤ Refer to spinal surgeon if myelopathic features │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MANAGEMENT DECISIONS │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MILD MYELOPATHY (mJOA ≥15): │
│ ➤ Consider conservative management with close monitoring │
│ ➤ Activity modification │
│ ➤ Review every 3-6 months (clinical + MRI if worsening) │
│ ➤ Surgery if progression │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MODERATE MYELOPATHY (mJOA 12-14): │
│ ➤ Surgery generally recommended │
│ ➤ Anterior (ACDF, corpectomy) or posterior approach │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SEVERE MYELOPATHY (mJOA <12): │
│ ➤ Surgery strongly recommended │
│ ➤ Worse pre-op function = worse recovery │
│ ➤ Early surgery before further decline │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ RAPIDLY PROGRESSIVE / TRAUMA: │
│ ➤ Urgent surgical decompression │
│ ➤ Immobilisation pending surgery │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Surgical Options
| Procedure | Approach | Indication |
|---|---|---|
| ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion) | Anterior | 1-3 level disease; disc/osteophyte prominence |
| Cervical Corpectomy | Anterior | Multi-level; vertebral body disease; OPLL |
| Laminectomy | Posterior | Multi-level; preserved lordosis |
| Laminoplasty | Posterior | Multi-level; expands canal; preserves motion |
| Combined Anterior-Posterior | Both | Severe stenosis; instability; OPLL |
Conservative Management (Selected Cases Only)
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Patient selection | Mild myelopathy (mJOA ≥15); stable; not progressing |
| Activity modification | Avoid high-risk activities; neck extension |
| Collar | Limited role; may use during acute episodes |
| Physiotherapy | Balance, strengthening |
| Monitoring | Close clinical follow-up; repeat MRI if symptoms progress |
| When to convert to surgery | Any progression of symptoms or signs |
Surgical Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | 5-10% (ACDF) | Usually transient; due to retraction |
| CSF leak | 1-2% | Dural tear; may need repair |
| Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury | 1-2% (ACDF) | Hoarseness; usually temporary |
| Wound infection | 1-2% | Superficial or deep |
| Hardware failure | 2-5% | Screw loosening, plate migration |
| Adjacent segment disease | 10-15% at 10 years | Degeneration above/below fusion |
| C5 palsy | 3-5% (posterior) | Deltoid weakness; usually recovers |
| Neurological worsening | <1% | Rare; cord injury |
| Instability | Variable | Post-laminectomy kyphosis |
Disease Complications (Without Treatment)
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Progressive neurological decline | Most patients deteriorate over time |
| Falls and fractures | Due to gait instability |
| Loss of independence | Mobility and hand function |
| Bladder/bowel dysfunction | Late manifestation |
| Central cord syndrome | Even minor trauma can cause severe injury in stenotic canal |
Natural History
| Outcome | Proportion |
|---|---|
| Progressive deterioration | 20-60% will worsen without surgery |
| Stable | 20-40% remain stable (unpredictable which patients) |
| Improvement | Rare without intervention |
| Stepwise decline | Typical pattern with episodes of worsening |
Surgical Outcomes
| Factor | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Overall improvement | 60-90% improve or stabilise with surgery |
| Halting progression | >95% stop progressive decline |
| Functional recovery | Inversely related to duration and severity |
| Long-term durability | Fusion maintains decompression; ASD may occur |
Prognostic Factors
| Good Prognosis | Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|
| Shorter symptom duration | Long duration (>1-2 years) |
| Younger age | Elderly |
| Mild myelopathy (higher mJOA) | Severe myelopathy (low mJOA) |
| No T2 signal change on MRI | T2 hyperintensity (myelomalacia) |
| Single-level disease | Multi-level stenosis |
| Early surgical decompression | Delayed surgery |
Key Guidelines
| Guideline | Organisation | Year | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Practice Guidelines for DCM | AO Spine | 2017 | Surgery recommended for moderate-severe myelopathy |
| Evidence-Based Guidelines | NASS/Congress | Updated | Surgical decompression effective |
Landmark Studies
Fehlings et al. — AOSpine North America (2013)
- Prospective study of surgical outcomes for DCM
- n=278 patients; 280 surgical patients
- 80% improved with surgery; predictors of outcome identified
- PMID: 23334673
Kadanka et al. — RCT Surgical vs Conservative (2002)
- RCT comparing surgery vs conservative for mild CSM
- No significant difference at 2-3 years for MILD disease
- Does NOT apply to moderate/severe myelopathy
- PMID: 12415118
Tetreault et al. — Predictors of Outcome (2015)
- Systematic review of prognostic factors
- Duration of symptoms, baseline severity predict outcome
- Supports early surgery for better outcomes
- PMID: 25299038
Evidence Strength
| Intervention | Level | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Surgery for moderate-severe myelopathy | 1b-2a | RCTs, prospective studies |
| Anterior vs posterior approach | 2a | No clear superiority; based on anatomy |
| Conservative for mild stable disease | 2b | Single RCT; requires close monitoring |
What is Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?
CSM is a condition where age-related changes in the neck bones put pressure on the spinal cord. This can affect the nerves that control your arms, legs, and bladder.
Why does it happen?
As we age, the discs between the neck bones wear out, bone spurs can form, and the ligaments can thicken. In some people, these changes narrow the space around the spinal cord enough to cause pressure on the cord.
What are the symptoms?
- Clumsy hands — difficulty with buttons, writing, or picking up small objects
- Unsteady walking — feeling off balance, stiff legs
- Numbness or tingling in hands
- Weakness in arms or legs
- In advanced cases, bladder problems
How is it treated?
Treatment depends on how severe your symptoms are:
- Mild symptoms: Careful monitoring, physiotherapy, avoiding risky activities
- Moderate to severe symptoms: Surgery to take pressure off the spinal cord (decompression)
Surgery can be done from the front of the neck (removing the disc and fusing the bones) or from the back (opening up the bone covering the cord).
What to expect?
With surgery, most people stop getting worse and many improve. Recovery depends on how severe the symptoms were before surgery and how long they were present. Earlier treatment generally leads to better outcomes.
When to seek help urgently
Seek immediate medical attention if you notice:
- Rapid worsening of weakness or numbness
- Loss of bladder or bowel control
- Sudden difficulty walking
- Any of these symptoms after a fall or neck injury
Guidelines
- Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, et al. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):70S-83S. PMID: 29164034
Key Studies
-
Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(18):1651-1658. PMID: 24048552
-
Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednarik J, et al. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine. 2002;27(20):2205-2210. PMID: 12415118
-
Tetreault LA, Karpova A, Fehlings MG. Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment. Eur Spine J. 2015;24 Suppl 2:236-251. PMID: 25299038
Reviews
-
Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis. Spine. 2015;40(12):E675-693. PMID: 25839387
-
Myelopathy.org. Patient resources. myelopathy.org
High-Yield Exam Topics
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Clinical pattern | Clumsy hands + spastic gait + UMN signs in legs + mixed in arms |
| Hoffman's sign | Flick middle finger DIP → thumb flexion = positive = UMN lesion above C5/6 |
| Inverted biceps reflex | Tap biceps → no biceps contraction BUT finger flexion = C5/6 level LMN, UMN below |
| MRI findings | Cord compression; T2 hyperintensity indicates cord damage |
| Surgical options | ACDF (anterior); Laminectomy/laminoplasty (posterior) |
| Natural history | Progressive deterioration in majority; surgery halts decline |
Sample Viva Questions
Q1: A 65-year-old presents with difficulty buttoning shirts, unsteady gait, and numb hands. How do you assess him?
Model Answer: This presentation is highly suggestive of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. I would take a detailed history (duration, progression, bladder symptoms, neck pain, trauma) and perform a full neurological examination. Key examination findings to elicit: Hoffman's sign (UMN above C5/6), inverted biceps reflex (LMN at C5-6 with UMN below), hyperreflexia and upgoing plantars in legs, spastic gait. I would also assess finger escape sign and check for a sensory level. Investigation of choice is MRI cervical spine looking for cord compression and T2 signal change. If confirmed, I would refer urgently to a spinal surgeon for consideration of decompression.
Q2: What is Hoffman's sign and what does it indicate?
Model Answer: Hoffman's sign is elicited by flicking the distal phalanx of the middle finger. A positive response is reflex flexion of the thumb and/or index finger. It indicates an upper motor neurone lesion affecting the corticospinal tract above the level of C5-6 (where the finger flexor reflex arc is located). In the context of a patient with gait disturbance and hand clumsiness, a positive Hoffman's sign strongly suggests cervical myelopathy and should prompt MRI of the cervical spine.
Q3: Compare anterior and posterior surgical approaches for CSM.
Model Answer: Anterior (ACDF, corpectomy):
- Addresses ventral pathology (disc, osteophytes)
- Good for 1-3 level disease
- Requires fusion with graft/cage and plate
- Risks: Dysphagia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
Posterior (laminectomy, laminoplasty):
- Indirect decompression; cord "falls back"
- Good for multi-level stenosis
- Laminoplasty preserves motion; laminectomy + fusion for instability
- Requires preserved lordosis (kyphotic spine → consider anterior)
- Risks: C5 palsy, post-laminectomy kyphosis, neck pain
Choice depends on: Number of levels, location of compression, cervical alignment, surgeon experience.
Common Exam Errors
| Error | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Confusing radiculopathy with myelopathy | Myelopathy = cord compression (UMN signs in legs); Radiculopathy = nerve root (dermatomal, LMN) |
| Missing Hoffman's sign | Always test in patients with suspected cord pathology |
| Recommending conservative management for moderate myelopathy | Surgery recommended for moderate-severe; conservative only for mild stable disease |
| Ignoring bladder symptoms | Bladder dysfunction is a red flag for established myelopathy |
| Ordering X-ray instead of MRI | MRI is gold standard; X-ray shows bones, not cord |
Last Reviewed: 2025-12-24 | MedVellum Editorial Team
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists.