Bullous Pemphigoid
Summary
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease, predominantly affecting elderly individuals. It is characterised by tense, subepidermal blisters on an erythematous or urticarial base, caused by IgG autoantibodies targeting hemidesmosomal proteins (BP180 and BP230) at the dermal-epidermal junction. Unlike pemphigus, blisters are tense and do not rupture easily, and Nikolsky sign is negative. The disease causes significant morbidity with intense pruritus, skin fragility, and risk of secondary infection. Treatment is with potent topical corticosteroids (first-line) or systemic immunosuppression for severe cases. Prognosis is generally good with treatment, but elderly patients have increased mortality due to treatment side effects and comorbidities.
Key Facts
- Epidemiology: Incidence 4-22 per million/year; increases exponentially with age
- Mean age of onset: 75-80 years
- Target antigens: BP180 (type XVII collagen) and BP230
- Blister type: Tense, subepidermal (vs flaccid in pemphigus)
- Nikolsky sign: Negative (epidermis intact)
- Immunofluorescence: Linear IgG and C3 at basement membrane zone
- First-line treatment: Very potent topical corticosteroids (clobetasol propionate)
- Prognosis: Chronic, relapsing-remitting; most remit within 5 years
- Mortality: 1-year mortality 20-40% (elderly, comorbidities, treatment side effects)
- Drug-induced: DPP-4 inhibitors (gliptins), PD-1 inhibitors increasingly recognised
Clinical Pearls
"Tense vs Flaccid Rule": Bullous pemphigoid has TENSE blisters (subepidermal; epidermis intact) while pemphigus has FLACCID blisters (intraepidermal; fragile roof). This clinical distinction is key before biopsy.
"The Urticarial Phase": BP often presents with pruritic urticarial plaques for weeks before blisters appear. Consider BP in elderly patients with new urticaria that doesn't respond to antihistamines.
"Topical First": The landmark BLISTER trial showed whole-body potent topical steroids are MORE effective than oral prednisolone with FEWER side effects. Topical is first-line even in extensive disease.
"Gliptin Alert": DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, linagliptin) are increasingly recognised as triggers of BP. Always check drug history and consider stopping the culprit.
"Beware the Comorbidity": BP patients are elderly with comorbidities. Mortality is driven by treatment complications (infections, falls, metabolic effects) more than the disease itself.
Why This Matters Clinically
Bullous pemphigoid causes significant morbidity in a vulnerable elderly population. Intense pruritus impairs sleep and quality of life. Large blisters and erosions are painful and prone to infection. Accurate diagnosis avoids inappropriate treatment, while optimal management balances disease control with minimising treatment toxicity. Recognition of drug-induced cases can lead to cure by stopping the offending agent.[1,2]
Incidence & Prevalence
| Parameter | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence | 4-22 per million/year | Increasing, likely due to aging population and improved recognition |
| Prevalence | 60 per million | Point prevalence |
| Age peak | 75-80 years | Rare before 60 years |
| Trend | Increasing | 2-4 fold increase over past decades |
Demographics
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Age | Mean 75-80 years; exponentially increases after age 60 |
| Sex | Slight male predominance (1.2:1) |
| Geography | Worldwide; increased recognition in developed countries |
| Setting | Common in nursing homes and care facilities |
Risk Factors
| Factor | Relative Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced age | High | Primary risk factor |
| Neurological disease | 2-4x | Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, stroke, dementia |
| Diabetes | 1.5-2x | Type 2 diabetes and DPP-4 inhibitor use |
| DPP-4 inhibitors | 2-3x | Sitagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin |
| PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors | Increasing | Cancer immunotherapy-induced |
| Diuretics | Possible | Loop diuretics, thiazides |
| Nursing home residence | High | Combined age/comorbidity risk |
| HLA associations | Variable | HLA-DQB1*0301 in some populations |
Mechanism
Step 1: Loss of Tolerance
- Genetic predisposition (HLA associations) combined with unknown triggers
- Regulatory T-cell dysfunction in the elderly immune system
- Autoimmune response against basement membrane proteins
Step 2: Autoantibody Production
- B cells produce IgG autoantibodies targeting:
- BP180 (BPAG2/type XVII collagen) — NC16A domain
- BP230 (BPAG1) — intracellular hemidesmosomal component
- Antibody levels correlate with disease activity
Step 3: Immune Complex Deposition
- IgG and C3 deposit linearly at basement membrane zone
- Complement activation (classical pathway)
- Mast cell degranulation releases inflammatory mediators
- Eosinophil and neutrophil chemotaxis
Step 4: Subepidermal Blister Formation
- Proteolytic enzymes (elastase, matrix metalloproteinases) degrade hemidesmosomal proteins
- Loss of dermal-epidermal adhesion
- Fluid accumulates in lamina lucida (subepidermal cleft)
- Epidermis separates as intact sheet (tense blisters)
Step 5: Clinical Disease
- Pruritic urticarial plaques initially
- Progression to tense bullae on erythematous base
- Erosions develop when blisters rupture
- Healing without scarring (unless secondary infection)
Key Differences from Pemphigus
| Feature | Bullous Pemphigoid | Pemphigus Vulgaris |
|---|---|---|
| Blisters | Tense, don't rupture easily | Flaccid, fragile, rupture early |
| Blister level | Subepidermal (lamina lucida) | Intraepidermal (suprabasal) |
| Target proteins | BP180, BP230 (hemidesmosomes) | Desmoglein 1, 3 (desmosomes) |
| Nikolsky sign | Negative | Positive |
| Mucosal involvement | Rare (<20%) | Common (>50%) |
| Age | Elderly (>70) | Middle-aged (40-60) |
| Prognosis | Good with treatment | More serious, higher mortality |
Drug-Induced BP
| Drug Class | Examples | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| DPP-4 inhibitors | Sitagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin | Alteration of basement membrane proteins; immune dysregulation |
| PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors | Pembrolizumab, nivolumab | Immune checkpoint release → autoimmunity |
| Loop diuretics | Furosemide, bumetanide | Uncertain; possibly immunomodulatory |
| Antibiotics | Penicillins, quinolones | Rare; hypersensitivity |
Prodromal Phase (Pre-Bullous)
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Pruritus | Often severe; may precede blisters by weeks to months |
| Urticarial plaques | Erythematous, raised plaques; may be misdiagnosed as urticaria |
| Eczematous lesions | May mimic eczema in elderly |
| Duration | Days to weeks before blisters |
Bullous Phase
| Feature | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Blisters | Tense, dome-shaped, 1-4 cm diameter |
| Base | Erythematous or urticarial skin; may be normal skin |
| Contents | Clear serous fluid (haemorrhagic if longstanding) |
| Distribution | Flexural: inner thighs, axillae, abdomen, forearms |
| Nikolsky sign | Negative (epidermis does not peel with lateral pressure) |
| Erosions | Develop when blisters rupture; heal without scarring |
| Mucosal involvement | Rare (<20%); oral blisters/erosions |
Distribution Pattern
| Site | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lower limbs | 80% | Inner thighs, legs |
| Trunk | 75% | Abdomen, flanks |
| Upper limbs | 60% | Flexor forearms |
| Axillae | 50% | Flexural |
| Oral mucosa | 10-20% | Usually not first presentation |
| Scalp | Rare | May occur |
Red Flags
[!CAUTION] Red Flags — Require Urgent Assessment:
- Extensive disease (>20% BSA) with fluid/protein loss
- Signs of cellulitis or secondary bacterial infection
- Elderly patient with poor nutrition or multiple comorbidities
- Mucosal involvement (consider pemphigus)
- Known immunosuppression
- New-onset in patient on DPP-4 inhibitor or checkpoint inhibitor (drug-induced BP)
Structured Approach
General Inspection:
- Overall condition and frailty
- Nutritional status
- Signs of sepsis or systemic illness
Skin Examination:
- Distribution and extent of blisters (calculate %BSA)
- Character of blisters (tense vs flaccid)
- Base (erythematous, urticarial, normal skin)
- Presence of erosions, crusting
- Signs of secondary infection (purulence, cellulitis)
- Nikolsky sign testing
Mucosal Examination:
- Oral cavity: blisters, erosions, bleeding gums
- Eyes: conjunctival involvement
- Genital mucosa
Documentation:
- Photograph lesions (with consent)
- Record BSA affected
- Disease activity scoring (BPDAI if available)
Special Signs
| Sign | Technique | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Nikolsky sign | Apply lateral pressure adjacent to lesion | Negative in BP (epidermis intact) |
| Asboe-Hansen sign | Pressure on blister extends it peripherally | May be positive (subepidermal fluid extends) |
| Bullae tense/intact | Observe blister integrity | Tense, don't rupture easily = BP |
Severity Scoring (BPDAI)
| Component | Scoring |
|---|---|
| Blisters/erosions | 0-120 (number × size weighting) |
| Urticarial/erythematous lesions | 0-120 |
| Mucosal involvement | 0-120 |
| Pruritus VAS | 0-10 |
| Total | 0-360 |
First-Line Investigations
| Investigation | Rationale | Expected Findings |
|---|---|---|
| FBC | Baseline; eosinophilia common | Eosinophilia (50% of patients) |
| U&E, LFTs, glucose | Baseline; monitor with steroids | Usually normal |
| Skin biopsy (H&E) | Histology | Subepidermal blister with eosinophil-rich infiltrate |
| Direct immunofluorescence (perilesional skin) | Diagnostic | Linear IgG and C3 at basement membrane zone |
Confirmatory Investigations
| Investigation | Indication | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Indirect IF (salt-split skin) | Distinguishes BP from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita | BP: IgG on epidermal side (roof); EBA: dermal side (floor) |
| BP180/BP230 ELISA | Serology for diagnosis and monitoring | Positive antibodies; titres correlate with disease activity |
| CXR | Pre-treatment baseline | Exclude infection, malignancy |
| DEXA scan | If prolonged steroid treatment anticipated | Baseline bone density |
Histopathology Findings
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Blister location | Subepidermal (in lamina lucida) |
| Inflammatory infiltrate | Eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes in upper dermis |
| Papillary oedema | May see eosinophilic spongiosis pre-bullous |
| Epidermis | Intact; no acantholysis (unlike pemphigus) |
Direct Immunofluorescence
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Linear IgG at BMZ | Characteristic of BP |
| Linear C3 at BMZ | Often accompanies IgG; complement activation |
| IgA, IgM | Less common |
| Pattern | Smooth, linear band at dermal-epidermal junction |
Management Algorithm
BULLOUS PEMPHIGOID
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INITIAL ASSESSMENT │
│ - Confirm diagnosis: biopsy + DIF │
│ - Calculate BSA affected │
│ - Assess severity: localised vs generalised │
│ - Check drug history (DPP-4i, PD-1i) │
│ - Baseline bloods, CXR │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DRUG-INDUCED BP? │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ➤ If on DPP-4 inhibitor or PD-1 inhibitor: │
│ - Stop the offending drug │
│ - May still require treatment; often slower to resolve │
│ - Liaise with prescribing specialty │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FIRST-LINE: VERY POTENT TOPICAL STEROIDS │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ➤ Clobetasol propionate 0.05% (Dermovate) cream/oint │
│ ➤ Apply 20-40 g/day to ENTIRE body (except face) │
│ ➤ Continue until clear (usually 4-8 weeks) │
│ ➤ Then taper gradually over weeks │
│ ➤ First-line even in extensive disease (BLISTER trial) │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ADDITIONAL THERAPIES │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LOCALISED/MILD: │
│ ➤ Potent topical steroids only │
│ │
│ MODERATE: │
│ ➤ Add doxycycline 200 mg/day (anti-inflammatory) │
│ ➤ ± Nicotinamide 500 mg TDS │
│ │
│ SEVERE/REFRACTORY: │
│ ➤ Oral prednisolone 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day (lower doses) │
│ ➤ + PPI + bone protection │
│ ➤ Consider: Mycophenolate, Azathioprine, Dapsone │
│ ➤ Rituximab for severe refractory cases │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SUPPORTIVE CARE │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ➤ Wound care: Non-adherent dressings for erosions │
│ ➤ Infection prevention: Watch for cellulitis │
│ ➤ Nutrition: Protein supplementation if extensive │
│ ➤ Antihistamines: For pruritus │
│ ➤ Osteoporosis prevention: If on systemic steroids │
│ ➤ Glucose monitoring: Steroid-induced diabetes │
│ ➤ VTE prophylaxis if hospitalised │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Treatment Dosing
| Treatment | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Clobetasol propionate 0.05% | 20-40 g/day whole body | First-line; apply to all affected and unaffected skin (except face) |
| Doxycycline | 200 mg once daily | Anti-inflammatory; avoid in renal impairment |
| Nicotinamide | 500 mg TDS | Adjunctive; anti-inflammatory |
| Prednisolone | 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day | Reserve for severe/refractory; use lowest effective dose |
| Azathioprine | 1-2.5 mg/kg/day | Steroid-sparing; check TPMT first |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | 1-2 g/day | Steroid-sparing; monitor for infection |
| Dapsone | 50-150 mg/day | Alternative; check G6PD first |
| Rituximab | 1 g x2 doses (2 weeks apart) | Severe refractory; specialist use |
Tapering Protocol
| Phase | Duration | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Induction | Until lesions heal (4-8 weeks) | Full-dose clobetasol whole body |
| Taper | Gradual over weeks-months | Reduce frequency; then potency |
| Maintenance | Variable | May need low-potency topical for maintenance |
| Relapse | Variable | Restart at previous effective dose |
Disease-Related Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary bacterial infection | 10-15% | Antibiotics (flucloxacillin, co-amoxiclav) |
| Cellulitis | Common | Systemic antibiotics; may require IV |
| Sepsis | Rare but serious | Hospital admission; broad-spectrum antibiotics |
| Fluid/protein loss | Extensive disease | IV fluids; nutritional support |
| Scarring | Rare (usually from secondary infection) | Prevention is key |
Treatment-Related Complications (Systemic Steroids)
| Complication | Prevention/Monitoring |
|---|---|
| Diabetes mellitus | Monitor glucose; manage appropriately |
| Osteoporosis | Calcium + vitamin D; bisphosphonates |
| Infection | Vigilance; low threshold for antibiotics |
| Adrenal suppression | Gradual steroid taper |
| Skin atrophy | Minimize prolonged potent topical steroid use |
| Cataracts, glaucoma | Ophthalmology review if prolonged treatment |
| GI ulceration | PPI cover |
Natural History
| Outcome | Probability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Remission within 5 years | 50-70% | Spontaneous or treatment-induced |
| Chronic relapsing course | 30-50% | Requires long-term management |
| Cure | Variable | Drug-induced BP may fully resolve after stopping culprit |
Mortality
| Factor | 1-Year Mortality | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 20-40% | Higher than age-matched controls |
| Treatment-related | Significant | Infections, falls, metabolic complications |
| Disease-related | Lower | Fluid/protein loss, sepsis |
| Comorbidity-related | High | Elderly population with multiple diseases |
Prognostic Factors
| Good Prognosis | Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|
| Younger age (relative) | Advanced age (>80 years) |
| Localised disease | Extensive disease (>20% BSA) |
| Good performance status | Frailty, multiple comorbidities |
| Drug-induced (if drug stopped) | High antibody titres |
| Response to topical therapy | Need for systemic immunosuppression |
Key Guidelines
| Guideline | Organisation | Year | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK guidelines for management of bullous pemphigoid | BAD | 2012 | Potent topical steroids first-line; superpotent clobetasol |
| European guideline on pemphigoid diseases | EDF/EADV | 2020 | Diagnosis, management, monitoring protocols |
| BLISTER trial | UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network | 2017 | Topical clobetasol superior to oral prednisolone |
Landmark Trials
BLISTER Trial (2017)
- RCT: 132 patients, clobetasol propionate vs prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg)
- Result: Topical clobetasol non-inferior and associated with fewer severe adverse events
- 1-year mortality: 24% topical vs 19% oral (not significant)
- Favours topical steroids as first-line
- PMID: 28215660
Joly et al. (2002)
- French RCT: Topical clobetasol vs oral prednisone (1 mg/kg)
- Topical was more effective with fewer side effects
- PMID: 12126322
Kirtschig et al. Cochrane Review (2010)
- Systematic review of treatments for BP
- Confirmed potent topical steroids effective; lower side effects than oral
- PMID: 20927719
Evidence Strength
| Intervention | Level | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Potent topical corticosteroids | 1a | RCTs, meta-analysis |
| Oral prednisolone | 1b | RCTs; higher adverse events |
| Doxycycline | 2b | Observational studies, case series |
| Rituximab | 3 | Case series, uncontrolled studies |
What is Bullous Pemphigoid?
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a skin condition that causes large, itchy blisters. It mainly affects older adults, usually over 70 years old. It is not contagious—you cannot catch it from someone else or pass it on.
Why does it happen?
In BP, the immune system mistakenly attacks the layer that holds your skin together. This causes fluid to collect between the skin layers, forming blisters. We don't always know why this happens, but some medications can trigger it.
What are the symptoms?
- Severe itching (often the first symptom)
- Red, raised patches or hives-like areas
- Large blisters, usually on the arms, legs, and trunk
- Blisters are firm and don't break easily
- Mouth or eye involvement is rare
How is it treated?
The main treatment is a very strong steroid cream (clobetasol) applied to the skin. This is very effective and has fewer side effects than steroid tablets. For severe cases, steroid tablets or other medications may be needed.
Treatment usually continues for several months. Most people get better, but the condition can come back.
What to expect?
- Most people improve with treatment
- Blisters heal without scarring (unless infected)
- Treatment may take weeks to months
- It may come back (relapse) after stopping treatment
- Regular follow-up is needed
When to seek help
See a doctor urgently if you notice:
- Spreading redness around blisters (may be infection)
- Fever or feeling very unwell
- New blisters spreading rapidly
- Blisters in the mouth or eyes
Guidelines
-
Venning VA, Taghipour K, Mohd Mustapa MF, et al. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid 2012. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(6):1200-1214. PMID: 23121204
-
Borradori L, Van Beek N, Feliciani C, et al. Updated S2K guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(10):1689-1704. PMID: 35644568
Key Trials
-
Williams HC, Wojnarowska F, Kirtschig G, et al. Doxycycline versus prednisolone as an initial treatment strategy for bullous pemphigoid: a pragmatic, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (BLISTER). Lancet. 2017;389(10079):1630-1638. PMID: 28215660
-
Joly P, Roujeau JC, Benichou J, et al. A comparison of oral and topical corticosteroids in patients with bullous pemphigoid. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(5):321-327. PMID: 11821508
Reviews
-
Kirtschig G, Middleton P, Bennett C, et al. Interventions for bullous pemphigoid. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD002292. PMID: 20927719
-
Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):320-332. PMID: 23237497
-
Kridin K. Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases: overview, epidemiology, and associations. Immunol Res. 2018;66(1):6-17. PMID: 29374354
Further Resources
-
British Association of Dermatologists. Patient information. bad.org.uk
-
DermNet NZ. Bullous pemphigoid. dermnetnz.org
High-Yield Exam Topics
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Tense vs flaccid blisters | Tense = BP (subepidermal); Flaccid = Pemphigus (intraepidermal) |
| Nikolsky sign | Negative in BP; Positive in Pemphigus |
| DIF pattern | Linear IgG + C3 at BMZ |
| Salt-split skin | IgG on epidermal side = BP; dermal side = EBA |
| First-line treatment | Very potent topical steroids (clobetasol whole body) |
| BLISTER trial | Topical steroids non-inferior to oral with fewer adverse events |
| Drug-induced BP | DPP-4 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors |
Sample Viva Questions
Q1: An 80-year-old presents with widespread tense blisters. How do you investigate?
Model Answer: Clinical examination suggests bullous pemphigoid (elderly, tense subepidermal blisters). I would perform a skin biopsy for H&E (expect subepidermal blister with eosinophils) and a perilesional biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (expect linear IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone). I would also request serology for BP180 and BP230 antibodies (ELISA), which confirm the diagnosis and can be used for monitoring. Baseline bloods including FBC (eosinophilia common), renal and liver function, and glucose are important before starting treatment.
Q2: What is the first-line treatment for extensive bullous pemphigoid?
Model Answer: The first-line treatment is very potent topical corticosteroids — specifically clobetasol propionate 0.05% applied to the entire body (20-40 g/day), based on the BLISTER and Joly trials. This is MORE effective than oral prednisolone and associated with fewer severe adverse events. Even in extensive disease, topical steroids should be tried first. Oral steroids (prednisolone 0.3-0.5 mg/kg) are reserved for cases refractory to topical treatment or where application is impractical.
Q3: How do you distinguish bullous pemphigoid from pemphigus vulgaris clinically?
Model Answer: Key differences include:
- Blister character: BP has tense blisters that don't rupture easily (subepidermal); PV has flaccid blisters that rupture early leaving erosions (intraepidermal).
- Nikolsky sign: Negative in BP; Positive in PV.
- Mucosal involvement: Rare in BP (<20%); common in PV (>50%).
- Age: BP affects elderly (>70); PV middle-aged (40-60).
- Prognosis: BP generally good; PV more serious.
Definitive distinction requires biopsy: DIF shows linear IgG/C3 at BMZ in BP vs intercellular (chicken-wire) pattern in PV.
Common Exam Errors
| Error | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Confusing BP with pemphigus | Tense blisters + elderly + negative Nikolsky = BP |
| Prescribing oral steroids first | Topical clobetasol is first-line (BLISTER trial) |
| Missing drug-induced BP | Always check for DPP-4 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors |
| Forgetting DIF is diagnostic | DIF on perilesional skin required for diagnosis |
| Not recognizing pre-bullous phase | Urticarial pruritic plaques in elderly = consider BP |
Last Reviewed: 2025-12-24 | MedVellum Editorial Team
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists.