MedVellum
MedVellum
Back to Library
Gastroenterology
General Surgery

Barrett's Oesophagus

High EvidenceUpdated: 2025-12-22

On This Page

Red Flags

  • Dysphagia (Warning sign of cancer)
  • Weight Loss
  • Evidence of GI Bleeding
Overview

Barrett's Oesophagus

1. Overview

Barrett's Oesophagus is a pre-malignant condition characterized by the replacement of the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the distal oesophagus with metaplastic columnar epithelium (containing goblet cells).

It is a direct complication of chronic Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) and acts as the precursor lesion for Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence: 1-2% of general population (higher in GORD).
  • Risk Profile: Obese, White Male, age >50, Chronic GORD (>5 years).
  • Cancer Risk: Low but significant (approx 0.3% - 0.5% per year).

2. Pathophysiology
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    BARRETT'S PATHOPHYSIOLOGY                                │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                 CHRONIC ACID EXPOSURE (GORD)                        │   │
│   │  • Acid and Bile reflux damaging the distal oesophagus.             │   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                    ↓                                        │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                 METAPLASIA (The switch)                             │   │
│   │  • The body tries to protect itself.                                │   │
│   │  • Squamous cells (fragile to acid) are replaced by Columnar cells  │   │
│   │    (tougher, intestine-like).                                       │   │
│   │  • "Salmon-pink" mucosa replaces "Pale-pink" mucosa.                │   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                    ↓                                        │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                 DYSPLASIA (The danger)                              │   │
│   │  • Disorderly growth within the metaplasia.                         │   │
│   │  • Low Grade -> High Grade.                                         │   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                    ↓                                        │
│                       ADENOCARCINOMA                                        │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

3. Clinical Features
  • Symptoms: Usually causes NO symptoms itself. The patient has symptoms of GORD (heartburn, regurgitation).
  • Silent Barrett's: Many patients are asymptomatic until cancer develops.
  • Warning Signs: Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) suggests progression to stricture or malignancy.

4. Diagnosis

Gold Standard: Upper GI Endoscopy (OGD) with Biopsy.

1. Endoscopic Appearance

  • Migration of the Z-line (Squamo-columnar junction) proximally.
  • Salmon-pink tongues extending up from the stomach.

2. The Prague Criteria (Reporting Standard)

  • C value: Circumferential extent (e.g., C2 = 2cm continuous ring).
  • M value: Maximum extent of tongues (e.g., M5 = 5cm tongue).

3. Histology

  • Required for diagnosis.
  • Must show Intestinal Metaplasia (Columnar epithelium with Goblet cells).

5. Management Algorithm

Management depends on the presence of Dysplasia.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    BARRETT'S MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│   DIAGNOSIS CONFIRMED (Non-Dysplastic)                                      │
│   • PPI Treatment: Full dose mainly for symptom control.                    │
│   • Surveillance Endoscopy:                                                 │
│     - Short segment (<3cm): Every 3-5 years.                                │
│     - Long segment (>3cm): Every 2-3 years.                                 │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                          ↓                                                  │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                 LOW GRADE DYSPLASIA (LGD)                           │   │
│   │  • Confirmed by TWO expert pathologists.                                │
│   │  • Option 1: Optimise PPI and repeat OGD in 6 months.               │   │
│   │  • Option 2: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) - increasingly preferred.│   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                          ↓                                                  │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                 HIGH GRADE DYSPLASIA (HGD)                          │   │
│   │  • HIGH risk of progression to cancer (or co-existing cancer).      │   │
│   │  • Treatment is MANDATORY.                                          │   │
│   │  • Endoscopic Resection (EMR) for visible nodules.                  │   │
│   │  • Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for flat mucosa.                   │   │
│   │  • Surgery (Oesophagectomy) rarely needed now for HGD alone.        │   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Endoscopic Therapy

  • EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection): Cutting out the lump. Staging and cure.
  • Halo RFA: Burning the bad lining so healthy squamous lining grows back.

6. Surveillance Debate
  • Who to screen? Routine screening of all GORD patients is not cost-effective.
  • Guidelines: Screen those with chronic GORD (>5 yrs) + Multiple Risk Factors (Male, White, Obesity, Age >50, Family history).

7. Prognosis
  • Non-dysplastic: Normal life expectancy. Low cancer risk.
  • High Grade Dysplasia: Very curable with endoscopic therapy (>90%).
  • Adenocarcinoma: Poor prognosis if advanced (5-year survival <20%).

8. Special Considerations

GORD Surgery (Fundoplication)

  • Does it stop Barrett's progression?
  • No strong evidence that anti-reflux surgery prevents cancer better than PPIs. It is done for symptom control, not cancer prevention.

Chemoprevention

  • PPIs: Chemoprotective effect (reduces neoplastic progression).
  • Aspirin: Some evidence suggests benefit, but risk of bleeding. Not routinely recommended yet.

9. Key Clinical Pearls

Exam-Focused Points

  1. Definition: Metaplasia of Squamous to Columnar.
  2. Histology: Goblet cells are the hallmark.
  3. Surveillance: Depends on length and dysplasia. Know the difference between "Discharge" (short segment, stable) vs "Ablate" (High grade dysplasia).
  4. HGD Management: RFA/EMR is first line. Oesophagectomy is a massive operation reserved for invasive cancer.
  5. Prague Criteria: C and M values.

Common Exam Scenarios

  • 60yo male with 20yr history of heartburn. OGD shows C5 M7 salmon mucosa. Next step? (Biopolies to check for dysplasia).
  • Biopsy shows High Grade Dysplasia. Management? (Refer to excessive center for RFA/EMR).
  • Patient asks if he will get cancer? (Risk is low, surveillance catches it early).

10. Patient Explanation

What is Barrett's?

"It is a change in the lining of your gullet acting like a callus. Because of the acid rising from your stomach over years, the gullet has changed its skin to resemble the stomach lining, which is tougher."

Is it cancer?

"No. It is a 'pre-cancerous' condition, meaning there is a small potential for it to turn into cancer in the future. We monitor it regularly with a camera to catch any changes early."


11. Evidence & Guidelines

Key Guidelines

GuidelineOrganizationYearKey Points
Barrett's OesophagusBSG (British Soc Gastro)2014Surveillance intervals and RFA.
Management of BEACG (USA)2016Similar guidelines.

Evidence-Based Recommendations

RecommendationEvidence Level
RFA for High Grade DysplasiaHigh (High cure rate)
PPI for all Barrett'sModerate
Routine ScreeningLow (Select high risk only)

13. References
  1. Fitzgerald RC, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63(1):7-42.
  2. Shaheen NJ, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016.

Last updated: 2025-12-22

At a Glance

EvidenceHigh
Last Updated2025-12-22

Red Flags

  • Dysphagia (Warning sign of cancer)
  • Weight Loss
  • Evidence of GI Bleeding

Clinical Pearls

  • High Grade. │ │

Guidelines

  • NICE Guidelines
  • BTS Guidelines
  • RCUK Guidelines