MedVellum
MedVellum
Back to Library
General Surgery
Emergency Medicine
EMERGENCY

Acute Appendicitis

High EvidenceUpdated: 2025-12-22

On This Page

Red Flags

  • Perforation risk after 48-72 hours
  • Elderly with atypical presentation
  • Pregnant patient with RLQ/RUQ pain
  • Septic shock
  • Peritonitis
1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Acute appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix, representing the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Classic presentation is abdominal pain migrating from periumbilical to RLQ, anorexia, and low-grade fever. Perforation risk increases significantly after 48-72 hours. Diagnosis is clinical, supported by CT imaging. Treatment is laparoscopic appendectomy, though antibiotics-only may be appropriate for uncomplicated cases.

Key Facts

Critical Alerts

  • Perforation risk increases significantly after 48-72 hours of symptom onset
  • Elderly and immunocompromised patients may present atypically with minimal pain
  • Pregnant women - appendix migrates cephalad; consider in RUQ pain
  • Children - higher perforation rates due to delayed diagnosis
  • Antibiotics alone may be appropriate for uncomplicated cases in select patients

Key Diagnostics

TestFindingSignificance
WBC>0,000/μLSupports diagnosis but non-specific
CRPElevatedHigher values suggest perforation
CT Abdomen/PelvisEnlarged appendix >mm, periappendiceal fat strandingGold standard imaging
US AbdomenNon-compressible appendix >mmFirst-line in pregnancy, children
UrinalysisSterile pyuria possibleRule out UTI; appendix near ureter

Emergency Treatments

ConditionTreatmentDose
SepsisIV Fluid Resuscitation30 mL/kg crystalloid
InfectionPiperacillin-Tazobactam4.5g IV q8h
AlternativeCeftriaxone + Metronidazole2g + 500mg IV
PainMorphine0.1 mg/kg IV titrated
NauseaOndansetron4-8mg IV

2. Epidemiology

Definition

Acute appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix, representing the most common surgical emergency worldwide. It typically presents with abdominal pain that classically migrates from the periumbilical region to the right lower quadrant (RLQ), though presentation can vary significantly.

Classification

  • Uncomplicated (Simple): Inflamed appendix without perforation, abscess, or phlegmon
  • Complicated: Perforation, abscess formation, phlegmon, or generalized peritonitis
  • Gangrenous: Necrotic appendix with impending or complete perforation
  • Appendiceal Mass: Walled-off inflammatory process around perforated appendix

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 100-200 per 100,000 population annually
  • Lifetime risk: 7-8% overall (males 8.6%, females 6.7%)
  • Peak incidence: Ages 10-30 years
  • Perforation rate: 20-30% at presentation; higher in extremes of age
  • Mortality: <1% uncomplicated; 5-15% with perforation (higher in elderly)
  • Negative appendectomy rate: 5-15% (decreasing with improved imaging)

Etiology

Obstruction (Primary Mechanism):

  • Fecaliths (40%) - calcified fecal material
  • Lymphoid hyperplasia (60%) - viral infections, inflammatory conditions
  • Foreign bodies - seeds, parasites
  • Tumors - carcinoid, adenocarcinoma, mucocele

Secondary Causes:

  • Bacterial invasion following mucosal injury
  • Ischemia from increased intraluminal pressure
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (especially Crohn's)

3. Pathophysiology

Mechanism of Disease

  1. Luminal Obstruction: Fecalith or lymphoid hyperplasia blocks appendiceal lumen
  2. Mucus Accumulation: Continued secretion increases intraluminal pressure
  3. Vascular Compromise: Pressure exceeds venous > arterial perfusion pressure
  4. Bacterial Invasion: Mucosal barrier breakdown allows bacterial translocation
  5. Transmural Inflammation: Full-thickness involvement of appendiceal wall
  6. Gangrene and Perforation: Necrosis leads to rupture (typically 48-72 hours)

Bacterial Flora

  • Polymicrobial infection is universal
  • Common organisms: E. coli, Bacteroides fragilis, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus
  • Anaerobic predominance in perforated cases

Natural History

StageTimeframePathologyClinical Correlation
Catarrhal0-12 hoursMucosal inflammationVague periumbilical pain
Suppurative12-24 hoursTransmural inflammationRLQ localization
Gangrenous24-48 hoursNecrosis, impending perforationSevere pain, fever
Perforated>8 hoursRupture, abscess, peritonitisMay have pain "relief" then worse

4. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

Classic Presentation (50-60% of cases):

Atypical Presentations:

Physical Examination

Vital Signs:

Abdominal Examination:

SignTechniqueInterpretation
McBurney's Point Tenderness1/3 distance from ASIS to umbilicusMost sensitive for appendicitis
Rovsing's SignPain in RLQ with LLQ palpationPeritoneal irritation
Psoas SignPain with right hip extensionRetrocecal appendix
Obturator SignPain with internal rotation of flexed right hipPelvic appendix
Guarding/RigidityVoluntary → InvoluntaryProgression of peritonitis
Rebound TendernessPain on release of pressurePeritoneal inflammation

Special Circumstances:


Anorexia
Present in >90% - "the hungry patient doesn't have appendicitis"
Periumbilical pain
Visceral pain from midgut inflammation (T10 dermatome)
Migration to RLQ
Parietal peritoneum involvement (6-12 hours after onset)
Nausea and vomiting
Usually follows pain onset (pain-nausea-vomiting sequence)
Low-grade fever
37.5-38.5°C; higher suggests perforation
5. Clinical Examination

(Integrated into Clinical Presentation above)

Red Flags

Life-Threatening Conditions

FindingConcernAction
Diffuse peritonitisPerforated appendicitisEmergent surgical consultation
Septic shockOverwhelming infectionAggressive resuscitation, urgent surgery
Free air on imagingBowel perforationEmergent laparotomy
RLQ mass with feverAppendiceal abscessCT-guided drainage vs surgery
Confusion/altered mental status in elderlyAtypical severe presentationLower threshold for imaging/surgery
Pregnant with RLQ painFetal mortality 4% uncomplicated, 36% perforatedUrgent MRI/US, early surgical involvement

High-Risk Features

  • Duration >48 hours: Perforation rate increases significantly
  • Extremes of age: <5 years or >65 years have higher complication rates
  • Immunocompromised: HIV, chemotherapy, transplant patients
  • Diabetes mellitus: May mask symptoms, higher complication rates
  • Obesity: Difficult examination, delayed diagnosis

6. Investigations

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisDistinguishing FeaturesKey Investigations
Mesenteric AdenitisRecent URI, diffuse tenderness, younger patientsCT shows enlarged nodes, normal appendix
Ovarian PathologyMid-cycle pain (mittelschmerz), ovarian cyst rupturePelvic US, beta-hCG
Ectopic PregnancyMissed period, vaginal bleeding, adnexal massBeta-hCG, transvaginal US
PID/TOABilateral pain, vaginal discharge, cervical motion tendernessSTI testing, pelvic US
Kidney Stone/PyelonephritisColicky flank pain, urinary symptoms, CVA tendernessUrinalysis, renal US/CT
Crohn's DiseaseChronic symptoms, diarrhea, perianal diseaseCT enterography, colonoscopy
Cecal DiverticulitisSimilar location, older patientsCT differentiation
Typhlitis (Neutropenic Enterocolitis)Neutropenic patient, RLQ painCT, blood cultures
Right-sided Colonic CancerWeight loss, anemia, change in bowel habitsColonoscopy, CT
Psoas AbscessBack pain, hip flexion preferenceCT, blood cultures

Pediatric Considerations

  • Intussusception: Colicky pain, "currant jelly" stool, younger children
  • Meckel's diverticulum: GI bleeding, obstruction
  • Testicular torsion: Scrotal pain, abnormal cremasteric reflex

Diagnostic Approach

Clinical Scoring Systems

Alvarado Score (MANTRELS):

CriteriaPoints
Migration of pain1
Anorexia1
Nausea/Vomiting1
Tenderness in RLQ2
Rebound pain1
Elevated temperature1
Leukocytosis2
Shift to left (>5% neutrophils)1
Total10

Interpretation:

  • 0-4: Appendicitis unlikely, observe or discharge
  • 5-6: Possible appendicitis, CT imaging recommended
  • 7-8: Probable appendicitis, surgical consultation
  • 9-10: Highly probable, consider surgery without imaging

Laboratory Studies

TestExpected FindingsClinical Utility
CBCWBC >0,000, left shiftSupports diagnosis; normal WBC doesn't exclude
CRPElevated (>0mg/L)Higher values (>0) suggest complicated disease
UrinalysisMay have sterile pyuriaRule out UTI; appendix near right ureter
Beta-hCGNegative in appendicitisEssential in reproductive-age women
LactateElevated if septicMarker of tissue hypoperfusion
LFTs/LipaseNormalRule out hepatobiliary/pancreatic causes

Imaging Studies

CT Abdomen/Pelvis with IV Contrast:

  • Sensitivity: 94-98%
  • Specificity: 95-98%
  • Findings: Appendix >6mm diameter, fat stranding, appendicolith, abscess
  • Advantages: Excellent for complications, alternative diagnoses
  • Disadvantages: Radiation exposure, contrast reactions, cost

Ultrasound:

  • Sensitivity: 75-90% (operator dependent)
  • Specificity: 85-95%
  • Findings: Non-compressible appendix >6mm, target sign, periappendiceal fluid
  • Advantages: No radiation (ideal for pregnancy, children), bedside availability
  • Disadvantages: Limited by body habitus, operator experience, bowel gas

MRI:

  • Sensitivity: 90-95%
  • Specificity: 95%
  • Best Use: Pregnancy when US inconclusive
  • Advantages: No radiation, excellent soft tissue contrast
  • Disadvantages: Time, availability, cost

Imaging Algorithm

  1. Reproductive-age women: Beta-hCG → Pelvic US → CT if inconclusive
  2. Children: Ultrasound first → CT if inconclusive
  3. Pregnant patients: US → MRI → CT only if diagnosis still unclear and critical
  4. Adult males, post-menopausal women, obese patients: CT first-line

7. Management

Principles of Management

  1. Resuscitation: IV fluids, analgesia, antiemetics
  2. Antibiotics: Empiric coverage for gram-negatives and anaerobes
  3. Source Control: Appendectomy (laparoscopic preferred) or drainage
  4. Supportive Care: NPO status, VTE prophylaxis, glycemic control

Resuscitation

  • IV Access: Two large-bore IVs (18G or larger)
  • Fluid Resuscitation: Crystalloid 20-30 mL/kg for dehydration/sepsis
  • Analgesia: Do NOT withhold - early analgesia improves diagnosis
  • NPO Status: Anticipate surgical intervention
  • NG Tube: Only if persistent vomiting or ileus

Antibiotic Therapy

Uncomplicated Appendicitis:

RegimenDoseDuration
Cefazolin + Metronidazole2g + 500mg IVSingle pre-op dose
Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole2g + 500mg IVPre-op and 24h post-op

Complicated (Perforated/Gangrenous):

RegimenDoseDuration
Piperacillin-Tazobactam4.5g IV q8h4-7 days (source control achieved)
Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole2g + 500mg IV q24/12h4-7 days
Meropenem1g IV q8hFor severe penicillin allergy, 4-7 days
Ertapenem1g IV q24hAlternative, 4-7 days

Surgical Management

Laparoscopic Appendectomy (Preferred):

  • Advantages: Less pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, better cosmesis
  • Technique: 3-port approach, appendix exteriorized and ligated
  • Conversion rate: 5-15% to open procedure

Open Appendectomy:

  • Indications: Extensive adhesions, mass/abscess, unavailable laparoscopy
  • Technique: McBurney or Rocky-Davis incision in RLQ

Timing of Surgery:

  • Uncomplicated: Within 24 hours of presentation (no benefit of "emergency" surgery)
  • Complicated with sepsis: Emergent surgical consultation, OR within hours
  • Appendiceal mass/phlegmon: May benefit from interval appendectomy (6-12 weeks later)

Non-Operative Management

Antibiotics-Only Approach (Select Patients):

  • Candidates: Uncomplicated appendicitis, patient preference, high surgical risk
  • Success rate: 70-80% initial success; 20-40% recurrence at 1 year
  • Regimen: IV antibiotics 2-3 days then oral for total 7-10 days
  • Follow-up: Requires interval imaging to exclude malignancy (especially >40 years)

Abscess Management

Percutaneous Drainage (Preferred for large abscess >3cm):

  • CT-guided catheter placement
  • Antibiotics for 10-14 days
  • Interval appendectomy at 6-12 weeks (controversial - may not be necessary)

Immediate Surgery:

  • Failed drainage
  • Generalized peritonitis
  • Septic patient not responding to antibiotics

8. Complications

Disposition

  • All patients undergoing appendectomy
  • Complicated appendicitis (perforation, abscess, peritonitis)
  • Sepsis or hemodynamic instability
  • Failed non-operative management
  • Significant comorbidities requiring close monitoring
  • Inability to tolerate oral intake
  • Inadequate pain control

ICU Admission Criteria

  • Septic shock requiring vasopressors
  • Respiratory failure
  • Multi-organ dysfunction
  • Significant cardiac comorbidities with unstable vitals

Discharge Criteria (Post-Operative)

  • Tolerating oral intake
  • Adequate pain control with oral medications
  • Afebrile for ≥24 hours
  • Passing flatus/bowel movement
  • Ambulatory
  • No signs of complications (wound infection, abscess)
  • Understanding of warning signs

Follow-Up Recommendations

SituationFollow-Up
Uncomplicated appendectomySurgeon in 2 weeks
Complicated appendectomySurgeon in 1-2 weeks
Non-operative managementSurgeon in 1 week; consider imaging at 6 weeks
Appendiceal mass/drainageInterval appendectomy discussion at 6-12 weeks
Age >0 with appendectomyConsider colonoscopy to rule out malignancy

11. Patient/Layperson Explanation

Condition Explanation

  • "Your appendix is a small finger-shaped pouch attached to your large intestine. It has become infected and inflamed, which is causing your pain."
  • "This is the most common reason for emergency abdominal surgery."
  • "Treatment usually involves removing the appendix surgically, which prevents it from rupturing and causing more serious infection."

Post-Operative Instructions

Activity:

  • Light activity for 1-2 weeks (laparoscopic) or 4-6 weeks (open)
  • No heavy lifting >10 lbs for 2-6 weeks depending on approach
  • May shower after 48 hours; avoid submerging in water for 2 weeks
  • Return to work: 1-2 weeks (desk job) or 4-6 weeks (physical labor)

Diet:

  • Advance from clear liquids to regular diet as tolerated
  • Stay well hydrated
  • Fiber intake to prevent constipation

Wound Care:

  • Keep incisions clean and dry
  • Steri-strips will fall off on their own in 7-10 days
  • Watch for signs of infection: redness, swelling, drainage, fever

Warning Signs Requiring Return

  • Fever >38.5°C (101.3°F)
  • Increasing abdominal pain
  • Redness, swelling, or pus from incision sites
  • Inability to keep liquids down for >24 hours
  • No bowel movement for >3-4 days
  • Severe nausea/vomiting
  • Difficulty breathing or chest pain

9. Prognosis & Outcomes

Special Populations

Pediatric Patients

  • Higher perforation rates: 30-75% (especially <5 years) due to delayed diagnosis
  • Presentation: Often atypical; diarrhea common; less reliable history
  • Imaging: Ultrasound preferred; CT only if inconclusive
  • Treatment: Laparoscopic appendectomy when possible

Elderly Patients (>65 years)

  • Higher mortality: 5-10% vs <1% in younger adults
  • Atypical presentation: Less pain, less fever, delayed presentation
  • Higher perforation rate: 40-70% at presentation
  • Imaging: Low threshold for CT; always consider malignancy
  • Postoperative: Higher complication rates, longer recovery

Pregnant Patients

  • Incidence: 1 in 1500 pregnancies
  • Challenges: Appendix migrates upward; leukocytosis normal in pregnancy
  • Imaging: Ultrasound → MRI preferred; CT only if necessary
  • Treatment: Surgical appendectomy at any gestational age
  • Fetal mortality: 4% uncomplicated; up to 36% if perforated
  • Avoid tocolytics: Not shown to prevent preterm labor post-appendectomy

Immunocompromised Patients

  • Higher risk of complications: Delayed healing, abscess formation
  • Atypical presentation: May lack fever, leukocytosis, significant pain
  • Lower threshold for imaging and surgery
  • Broaden antibiotic coverage: Consider antifungal in severe cases

Obese Patients (BMI >35)

  • Diagnostic challenges: Difficult physical examination
  • Imaging: CT often necessary; higher radiation doses needed
  • Surgical considerations: Higher conversion to open, longer operative time
  • Postoperative: Higher wound complications, VTE risk

Quality Metrics

Performance Indicators

MetricTargetRationale
Time to antibiotics (complicated)<1 hourReduces sepsis progression
Time to OR (uncomplicated)<24 hoursNo benefit of emergent surgery
Negative appendectomy rate<10%Balance diagnostic accuracy with avoiding perforation
Laparoscopic approach>0%Standard of care, better outcomes
SSI rate<5%Benchmark surgical quality
30-day readmission<5%Marker of complication rate

Documentation Requirements

  • Time of symptom onset
  • Vital signs and resuscitation efforts
  • Physical examination findings including peritoneal signs
  • Laboratory results (WBC, differential, CRP)
  • Imaging findings and interpretation
  • Alvarado or risk score documentation
  • Antibiotic timing and choice with rationale
  • Surgical consultation time and findings
  • Informed consent discussion
  • Disposition plan and follow-up arrangements

Quality Improvement Initiatives

  • Standardized imaging pathways to reduce radiation and negative appendectomy
  • Antibiotic stewardship: de-escalation after culture results
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
  • Same-day discharge protocols for uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy

10. Evidence & Guidelines

Key Clinical Pearls

Diagnostic Pearls

  • "The hungry patient doesn't have appendicitis": Anorexia is present in >90%
  • Pain precedes vomiting: Opposite sequence suggests gastroenteritis
  • Migration of pain is key: Periumbilical → RLQ is classic evolution
  • Normal WBC doesn't exclude appendicitis: 10-20% have normal counts
  • Right shift matters: >75% neutrophils increases likelihood
  • CRP >50 suggests complicated disease: Helpful for risk stratification
  • Never forget beta-hCG: Ectopic pregnancy is life-threatening

Treatment Pearls

  • Don't withhold analgesia: It improves rather than obscures diagnosis
  • Antibiotics before surgery: Reduces surgical site infections
  • Laparoscopic is preferred: Even in perforation and abscess
  • Timing isn't emergent for uncomplicated: 24-hour window acceptable
  • Antibiotics alone is an option: For uncomplicated, informed patients
  • Appendiceal mass: Consider delayed surgery after IV antibiotics

Disposition Pearls

  • Serial examinations are valid: If diagnosis uncertain, reassess in 6-8 hours
  • CT findings change management: Abscess → may warrant drainage first
  • Age >40 needs colonoscopy follow-up: Rule out underlying malignancy
  • High clinical suspicion + negative CT: Still consider surgical consultation
  • Recurrence after antibiotics-only: 20-40% will have recurrent appendicitis

12. References
  1. Di Saverio S, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
  2. Snyder MJ, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(1):25-33.
  3. Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287.
  4. Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1937-1943.
  5. CODA Collaborative. A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1907-1919.
  6. Talan DA, et al. Comparison of Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Adults with Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81(6):731-742.
  7. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Right Lower Quadrant Pain. American College of Radiology. 2022.
  8. UpToDate. Acute appendicitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and differential diagnosis. 2024.

Last updated: 2025-12-22

At a Glance

EvidenceHigh
Last Updated2025-12-22
Emergency Protocol

Red Flags

  • Perforation risk after 48-72 hours
  • Elderly with atypical presentation
  • Pregnant patient with RLQ/RUQ pain
  • Septic shock
  • Peritonitis

Clinical Pearls

  • arterial perfusion pressure

Guidelines

  • NICE Guidelines
  • BTS Guidelines
  • RCUK Guidelines