Summary
Acute appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix, representing the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Classic presentation is abdominal pain migrating from periumbilical to RLQ, anorexia, and low-grade fever. Perforation risk increases significantly after 48-72 hours. Diagnosis is clinical, supported by CT imaging. Treatment is laparoscopic appendectomy, though antibiotics-only may be appropriate for uncomplicated cases.
Key Facts
Critical Alerts
- Perforation risk increases significantly after 48-72 hours of symptom onset
- Elderly and immunocompromised patients may present atypically with minimal pain
- Pregnant women - appendix migrates cephalad; consider in RUQ pain
- Children - higher perforation rates due to delayed diagnosis
- Antibiotics alone may be appropriate for uncomplicated cases in select patients
Key Diagnostics
| Test | Finding | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| WBC | >0,000/μL | Supports diagnosis but non-specific |
| CRP | Elevated | Higher values suggest perforation |
| CT Abdomen/Pelvis | Enlarged appendix >mm, periappendiceal fat stranding | Gold standard imaging |
| US Abdomen | Non-compressible appendix >mm | First-line in pregnancy, children |
| Urinalysis | Sterile pyuria possible | Rule out UTI; appendix near ureter |
Emergency Treatments
| Condition | Treatment | Dose |
|---|---|---|
| Sepsis | IV Fluid Resuscitation | 30 mL/kg crystalloid |
| Infection | Piperacillin-Tazobactam | 4.5g IV q8h |
| Alternative | Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 2g + 500mg IV |
| Pain | Morphine | 0.1 mg/kg IV titrated |
| Nausea | Ondansetron | 4-8mg IV |
Definition
Acute appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix, representing the most common surgical emergency worldwide. It typically presents with abdominal pain that classically migrates from the periumbilical region to the right lower quadrant (RLQ), though presentation can vary significantly.
Classification
- Uncomplicated (Simple): Inflamed appendix without perforation, abscess, or phlegmon
- Complicated: Perforation, abscess formation, phlegmon, or generalized peritonitis
- Gangrenous: Necrotic appendix with impending or complete perforation
- Appendiceal Mass: Walled-off inflammatory process around perforated appendix
Epidemiology
- Incidence: 100-200 per 100,000 population annually
- Lifetime risk: 7-8% overall (males 8.6%, females 6.7%)
- Peak incidence: Ages 10-30 years
- Perforation rate: 20-30% at presentation; higher in extremes of age
- Mortality: <1% uncomplicated; 5-15% with perforation (higher in elderly)
- Negative appendectomy rate: 5-15% (decreasing with improved imaging)
Etiology
Obstruction (Primary Mechanism):
- Fecaliths (40%) - calcified fecal material
- Lymphoid hyperplasia (60%) - viral infections, inflammatory conditions
- Foreign bodies - seeds, parasites
- Tumors - carcinoid, adenocarcinoma, mucocele
Secondary Causes:
- Bacterial invasion following mucosal injury
- Ischemia from increased intraluminal pressure
- Inflammatory bowel disease (especially Crohn's)
Mechanism of Disease
- Luminal Obstruction: Fecalith or lymphoid hyperplasia blocks appendiceal lumen
- Mucus Accumulation: Continued secretion increases intraluminal pressure
- Vascular Compromise: Pressure exceeds venous > arterial perfusion pressure
- Bacterial Invasion: Mucosal barrier breakdown allows bacterial translocation
- Transmural Inflammation: Full-thickness involvement of appendiceal wall
- Gangrene and Perforation: Necrosis leads to rupture (typically 48-72 hours)
Bacterial Flora
- Polymicrobial infection is universal
- Common organisms: E. coli, Bacteroides fragilis, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus
- Anaerobic predominance in perforated cases
Natural History
| Stage | Timeframe | Pathology | Clinical Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catarrhal | 0-12 hours | Mucosal inflammation | Vague periumbilical pain |
| Suppurative | 12-24 hours | Transmural inflammation | RLQ localization |
| Gangrenous | 24-48 hours | Necrosis, impending perforation | Severe pain, fever |
| Perforated | >8 hours | Rupture, abscess, peritonitis | May have pain "relief" then worse |
Symptoms
Classic Presentation (50-60% of cases):
Atypical Presentations:
Physical Examination
Vital Signs:
Abdominal Examination:
| Sign | Technique | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| McBurney's Point Tenderness | 1/3 distance from ASIS to umbilicus | Most sensitive for appendicitis |
| Rovsing's Sign | Pain in RLQ with LLQ palpation | Peritoneal irritation |
| Psoas Sign | Pain with right hip extension | Retrocecal appendix |
| Obturator Sign | Pain with internal rotation of flexed right hip | Pelvic appendix |
| Guarding/Rigidity | Voluntary → Involuntary | Progression of peritonitis |
| Rebound Tenderness | Pain on release of pressure | Peritoneal inflammation |
Special Circumstances:
(Integrated into Clinical Presentation above)
Red Flags
Life-Threatening Conditions
| Finding | Concern | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Diffuse peritonitis | Perforated appendicitis | Emergent surgical consultation |
| Septic shock | Overwhelming infection | Aggressive resuscitation, urgent surgery |
| Free air on imaging | Bowel perforation | Emergent laparotomy |
| RLQ mass with fever | Appendiceal abscess | CT-guided drainage vs surgery |
| Confusion/altered mental status in elderly | Atypical severe presentation | Lower threshold for imaging/surgery |
| Pregnant with RLQ pain | Fetal mortality 4% uncomplicated, 36% perforated | Urgent MRI/US, early surgical involvement |
High-Risk Features
- Duration >48 hours: Perforation rate increases significantly
- Extremes of age: <5 years or >65 years have higher complication rates
- Immunocompromised: HIV, chemotherapy, transplant patients
- Diabetes mellitus: May mask symptoms, higher complication rates
- Obesity: Difficult examination, delayed diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features | Key Investigations |
|---|---|---|
| Mesenteric Adenitis | Recent URI, diffuse tenderness, younger patients | CT shows enlarged nodes, normal appendix |
| Ovarian Pathology | Mid-cycle pain (mittelschmerz), ovarian cyst rupture | Pelvic US, beta-hCG |
| Ectopic Pregnancy | Missed period, vaginal bleeding, adnexal mass | Beta-hCG, transvaginal US |
| PID/TOA | Bilateral pain, vaginal discharge, cervical motion tenderness | STI testing, pelvic US |
| Kidney Stone/Pyelonephritis | Colicky flank pain, urinary symptoms, CVA tenderness | Urinalysis, renal US/CT |
| Crohn's Disease | Chronic symptoms, diarrhea, perianal disease | CT enterography, colonoscopy |
| Cecal Diverticulitis | Similar location, older patients | CT differentiation |
| Typhlitis (Neutropenic Enterocolitis) | Neutropenic patient, RLQ pain | CT, blood cultures |
| Right-sided Colonic Cancer | Weight loss, anemia, change in bowel habits | Colonoscopy, CT |
| Psoas Abscess | Back pain, hip flexion preference | CT, blood cultures |
Pediatric Considerations
- Intussusception: Colicky pain, "currant jelly" stool, younger children
- Meckel's diverticulum: GI bleeding, obstruction
- Testicular torsion: Scrotal pain, abnormal cremasteric reflex
Clinical Scoring Systems
Alvarado Score (MANTRELS):
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Migration of pain | 1 |
| Anorexia | 1 |
| Nausea/Vomiting | 1 |
| Tenderness in RLQ | 2 |
| Rebound pain | 1 |
| Elevated temperature | 1 |
| Leukocytosis | 2 |
| Shift to left (>5% neutrophils) | 1 |
| Total | 10 |
Interpretation:
- 0-4: Appendicitis unlikely, observe or discharge
- 5-6: Possible appendicitis, CT imaging recommended
- 7-8: Probable appendicitis, surgical consultation
- 9-10: Highly probable, consider surgery without imaging
Laboratory Studies
| Test | Expected Findings | Clinical Utility |
|---|---|---|
| CBC | WBC >0,000, left shift | Supports diagnosis; normal WBC doesn't exclude |
| CRP | Elevated (>0mg/L) | Higher values (>0) suggest complicated disease |
| Urinalysis | May have sterile pyuria | Rule out UTI; appendix near right ureter |
| Beta-hCG | Negative in appendicitis | Essential in reproductive-age women |
| Lactate | Elevated if septic | Marker of tissue hypoperfusion |
| LFTs/Lipase | Normal | Rule out hepatobiliary/pancreatic causes |
Imaging Studies
CT Abdomen/Pelvis with IV Contrast:
- Sensitivity: 94-98%
- Specificity: 95-98%
- Findings: Appendix >6mm diameter, fat stranding, appendicolith, abscess
- Advantages: Excellent for complications, alternative diagnoses
- Disadvantages: Radiation exposure, contrast reactions, cost
Ultrasound:
- Sensitivity: 75-90% (operator dependent)
- Specificity: 85-95%
- Findings: Non-compressible appendix >6mm, target sign, periappendiceal fluid
- Advantages: No radiation (ideal for pregnancy, children), bedside availability
- Disadvantages: Limited by body habitus, operator experience, bowel gas
MRI:
- Sensitivity: 90-95%
- Specificity: 95%
- Best Use: Pregnancy when US inconclusive
- Advantages: No radiation, excellent soft tissue contrast
- Disadvantages: Time, availability, cost
Imaging Algorithm
- Reproductive-age women: Beta-hCG → Pelvic US → CT if inconclusive
- Children: Ultrasound first → CT if inconclusive
- Pregnant patients: US → MRI → CT only if diagnosis still unclear and critical
- Adult males, post-menopausal women, obese patients: CT first-line
Principles of Management
- Resuscitation: IV fluids, analgesia, antiemetics
- Antibiotics: Empiric coverage for gram-negatives and anaerobes
- Source Control: Appendectomy (laparoscopic preferred) or drainage
- Supportive Care: NPO status, VTE prophylaxis, glycemic control
Resuscitation
- IV Access: Two large-bore IVs (18G or larger)
- Fluid Resuscitation: Crystalloid 20-30 mL/kg for dehydration/sepsis
- Analgesia: Do NOT withhold - early analgesia improves diagnosis
- NPO Status: Anticipate surgical intervention
- NG Tube: Only if persistent vomiting or ileus
Antibiotic Therapy
Uncomplicated Appendicitis:
| Regimen | Dose | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Cefazolin + Metronidazole | 2g + 500mg IV | Single pre-op dose |
| Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 2g + 500mg IV | Pre-op and 24h post-op |
Complicated (Perforated/Gangrenous):
| Regimen | Dose | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | 4.5g IV q8h | 4-7 days (source control achieved) |
| Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 2g + 500mg IV q24/12h | 4-7 days |
| Meropenem | 1g IV q8h | For severe penicillin allergy, 4-7 days |
| Ertapenem | 1g IV q24h | Alternative, 4-7 days |
Surgical Management
Laparoscopic Appendectomy (Preferred):
- Advantages: Less pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, better cosmesis
- Technique: 3-port approach, appendix exteriorized and ligated
- Conversion rate: 5-15% to open procedure
Open Appendectomy:
- Indications: Extensive adhesions, mass/abscess, unavailable laparoscopy
- Technique: McBurney or Rocky-Davis incision in RLQ
Timing of Surgery:
- Uncomplicated: Within 24 hours of presentation (no benefit of "emergency" surgery)
- Complicated with sepsis: Emergent surgical consultation, OR within hours
- Appendiceal mass/phlegmon: May benefit from interval appendectomy (6-12 weeks later)
Non-Operative Management
Antibiotics-Only Approach (Select Patients):
- Candidates: Uncomplicated appendicitis, patient preference, high surgical risk
- Success rate: 70-80% initial success; 20-40% recurrence at 1 year
- Regimen: IV antibiotics 2-3 days then oral for total 7-10 days
- Follow-up: Requires interval imaging to exclude malignancy (especially >40 years)
Abscess Management
Percutaneous Drainage (Preferred for large abscess >3cm):
- CT-guided catheter placement
- Antibiotics for 10-14 days
- Interval appendectomy at 6-12 weeks (controversial - may not be necessary)
Immediate Surgery:
- Failed drainage
- Generalized peritonitis
- Septic patient not responding to antibiotics
Disposition
- All patients undergoing appendectomy
- Complicated appendicitis (perforation, abscess, peritonitis)
- Sepsis or hemodynamic instability
- Failed non-operative management
- Significant comorbidities requiring close monitoring
- Inability to tolerate oral intake
- Inadequate pain control
ICU Admission Criteria
- Septic shock requiring vasopressors
- Respiratory failure
- Multi-organ dysfunction
- Significant cardiac comorbidities with unstable vitals
Discharge Criteria (Post-Operative)
- Tolerating oral intake
- Adequate pain control with oral medications
- Afebrile for ≥24 hours
- Passing flatus/bowel movement
- Ambulatory
- No signs of complications (wound infection, abscess)
- Understanding of warning signs
Follow-Up Recommendations
| Situation | Follow-Up |
|---|---|
| Uncomplicated appendectomy | Surgeon in 2 weeks |
| Complicated appendectomy | Surgeon in 1-2 weeks |
| Non-operative management | Surgeon in 1 week; consider imaging at 6 weeks |
| Appendiceal mass/drainage | Interval appendectomy discussion at 6-12 weeks |
| Age >0 with appendectomy | Consider colonoscopy to rule out malignancy |
Condition Explanation
- "Your appendix is a small finger-shaped pouch attached to your large intestine. It has become infected and inflamed, which is causing your pain."
- "This is the most common reason for emergency abdominal surgery."
- "Treatment usually involves removing the appendix surgically, which prevents it from rupturing and causing more serious infection."
Post-Operative Instructions
Activity:
- Light activity for 1-2 weeks (laparoscopic) or 4-6 weeks (open)
- No heavy lifting >10 lbs for 2-6 weeks depending on approach
- May shower after 48 hours; avoid submerging in water for 2 weeks
- Return to work: 1-2 weeks (desk job) or 4-6 weeks (physical labor)
Diet:
- Advance from clear liquids to regular diet as tolerated
- Stay well hydrated
- Fiber intake to prevent constipation
Wound Care:
- Keep incisions clean and dry
- Steri-strips will fall off on their own in 7-10 days
- Watch for signs of infection: redness, swelling, drainage, fever
Warning Signs Requiring Return
- Fever >38.5°C (101.3°F)
- Increasing abdominal pain
- Redness, swelling, or pus from incision sites
- Inability to keep liquids down for >24 hours
- No bowel movement for >3-4 days
- Severe nausea/vomiting
- Difficulty breathing or chest pain
Special Populations
Pediatric Patients
- Higher perforation rates: 30-75% (especially <5 years) due to delayed diagnosis
- Presentation: Often atypical; diarrhea common; less reliable history
- Imaging: Ultrasound preferred; CT only if inconclusive
- Treatment: Laparoscopic appendectomy when possible
Elderly Patients (>65 years)
- Higher mortality: 5-10% vs <1% in younger adults
- Atypical presentation: Less pain, less fever, delayed presentation
- Higher perforation rate: 40-70% at presentation
- Imaging: Low threshold for CT; always consider malignancy
- Postoperative: Higher complication rates, longer recovery
Pregnant Patients
- Incidence: 1 in 1500 pregnancies
- Challenges: Appendix migrates upward; leukocytosis normal in pregnancy
- Imaging: Ultrasound → MRI preferred; CT only if necessary
- Treatment: Surgical appendectomy at any gestational age
- Fetal mortality: 4% uncomplicated; up to 36% if perforated
- Avoid tocolytics: Not shown to prevent preterm labor post-appendectomy
Immunocompromised Patients
- Higher risk of complications: Delayed healing, abscess formation
- Atypical presentation: May lack fever, leukocytosis, significant pain
- Lower threshold for imaging and surgery
- Broaden antibiotic coverage: Consider antifungal in severe cases
Obese Patients (BMI >35)
- Diagnostic challenges: Difficult physical examination
- Imaging: CT often necessary; higher radiation doses needed
- Surgical considerations: Higher conversion to open, longer operative time
- Postoperative: Higher wound complications, VTE risk
Performance Indicators
| Metric | Target | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Time to antibiotics (complicated) | <1 hour | Reduces sepsis progression |
| Time to OR (uncomplicated) | <24 hours | No benefit of emergent surgery |
| Negative appendectomy rate | <10% | Balance diagnostic accuracy with avoiding perforation |
| Laparoscopic approach | >0% | Standard of care, better outcomes |
| SSI rate | <5% | Benchmark surgical quality |
| 30-day readmission | <5% | Marker of complication rate |
Documentation Requirements
- Time of symptom onset
- Vital signs and resuscitation efforts
- Physical examination findings including peritoneal signs
- Laboratory results (WBC, differential, CRP)
- Imaging findings and interpretation
- Alvarado or risk score documentation
- Antibiotic timing and choice with rationale
- Surgical consultation time and findings
- Informed consent discussion
- Disposition plan and follow-up arrangements
Quality Improvement Initiatives
- Standardized imaging pathways to reduce radiation and negative appendectomy
- Antibiotic stewardship: de-escalation after culture results
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
- Same-day discharge protocols for uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy
Key Clinical Pearls
Diagnostic Pearls
- "The hungry patient doesn't have appendicitis": Anorexia is present in >90%
- Pain precedes vomiting: Opposite sequence suggests gastroenteritis
- Migration of pain is key: Periumbilical → RLQ is classic evolution
- Normal WBC doesn't exclude appendicitis: 10-20% have normal counts
- Right shift matters: >75% neutrophils increases likelihood
- CRP >50 suggests complicated disease: Helpful for risk stratification
- Never forget beta-hCG: Ectopic pregnancy is life-threatening
Treatment Pearls
- Don't withhold analgesia: It improves rather than obscures diagnosis
- Antibiotics before surgery: Reduces surgical site infections
- Laparoscopic is preferred: Even in perforation and abscess
- Timing isn't emergent for uncomplicated: 24-hour window acceptable
- Antibiotics alone is an option: For uncomplicated, informed patients
- Appendiceal mass: Consider delayed surgery after IV antibiotics
Disposition Pearls
- Serial examinations are valid: If diagnosis uncertain, reassess in 6-8 hours
- CT findings change management: Abscess → may warrant drainage first
- Age >40 needs colonoscopy follow-up: Rule out underlying malignancy
- High clinical suspicion + negative CT: Still consider surgical consultation
- Recurrence after antibiotics-only: 20-40% will have recurrent appendicitis
- Di Saverio S, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
- Snyder MJ, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(1):25-33.
- Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287.
- Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1937-1943.
- CODA Collaborative. A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1907-1919.
- Talan DA, et al. Comparison of Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Adults with Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81(6):731-742.
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Right Lower Quadrant Pain. American College of Radiology. 2022.
- UpToDate. Acute appendicitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and differential diagnosis. 2024.