Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) Injury
Summary
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a common shoulder injury resulting from direct trauma to the point of the shoulder, typically from falls (cycling, horse-riding) or contact sports (rugby, ice hockey). The injury involves damage to the AC ligaments and, in more severe cases, the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments. ACJ injuries are classified using the Rockwood classification (Types I-VI) based on the degree of ligament disruption and clavicle displacement. Most injuries (Types I-II) are treated conservatively with excellent outcomes. Type III is controversial, with initial conservative management favoured for most patients except high-demand athletes. Types IV-VI typically require surgical reconstruction.
Key Facts
- Definition: Injury to the acromioclavicular and/or coracoclavicular ligaments
- Mechanism: Direct blow to the shoulder point (FOOSH less common)
- Classification: Rockwood I-VI
- Most common types: I-III (95% of ACJ injuries)
- Key sign: Step deformity, "Piano Key" sign
- First-line treatment (I-II): Conservative (sling, analgesia, physiotherapy)
- Surgical threshold: Types IV-VI; selected Type III
Clinical Pearls
"Piano Key" Sign: In Type III+ injuries, pushing down on the prominent lateral clavicle allows it to descend, then it springs back up when released — like pressing a piano key.
The Type III Dilemma: Type III management is controversial. Most patients do well with conservative treatment. Consider surgery for high-demand athletes, manual workers, or those who fail conservative management after 3-6 months.
Zanca View: The best X-ray for ACJ assessment is the Zanca view (10-15° cephalic tilt). Standard AP views fail to show the ACJ adequately.
Why This Matters Clinically
ACJ injuries are common in active young adults and can cause persistent pain and weakness if mismanaged. Accurate classification guides treatment. Conservative management is appropriate for most, but surgical indications must be recognised. Chronic symptomatic ACJ injuries can be addressed with delayed reconstruction.
Incidence & Prevalence
- Incidence: 3-4 per 10,000 per year (general population)
- Proportion of shoulder injuries: 9-12%
- Trend: Stable (linked to sport participation)
Demographics
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Age | Peak 20-40 years (active adults) |
| Sex | Male:Female 5:1 |
| Activities | Cycling (most common), rugby, ice hockey, football, martial arts |
| Laterality | Right slightly more common (dominant arm) |
Risk Factors
Non-Modifiable:
- Male sex
- Participation in contact sports
- High-risk activities (cycling, horse-riding)
Modifiable:
| Risk Factor | Relative Risk |
|---|---|
| Contact sports | High |
| Cycling without protective equipment | Moderate |
| Previous ACJ injury | 2x |
| Inadequate protective gear | Variable |
Mechanism
Step 1: The Impact Vector
- Mechanism: Direct blow to the point of the shoulder (Adducted arm).
- Force Transmission: The force drives the Acromion Downwards. The Clavicle stays put (held by SCM and Trapezius).
- Relativity: It looks like the Clavicle went UP, but actually the Shoulder went DOWN.
Step 2: The "Zipper" Effect (Ligament Failure)
- AC Ligament Failure (Horizontal Instability): The weak AC capsule tears first. The joint becomes unstable horizontally (A-P).
- CC Ligament Sprain: Energy transfers to the Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments.
- CC Ligament Rupture (Vertical Instability): If force continues, the Trapezoid (Lateral) then Conoid (Medial) ligaments snap. The "Tether" is cut.
- Fascial Tearing: The Deltotrapezial fascia tears, creating a "buttonhole" for the clavicle to poke through.
Step 3: The "Floating" Clavicle
- Sternocleidomastoid (SCM): Pulls the medial clavicle UP.
- Gravity + Pect Major/Lat Dorsi: Pulls the arm/scapula DOWN.
- Result: The gap widens. The skin tents. The "Piano Key" is born.
Step 4: Chronic Changes (if untreated)
- Dysbiosis: The scapula sags (SICK Scapula syndrome).
- Impingement: The altered geometry causes subacromial impingement.
- Arthritis: The ACJ joint surface degenerates rapidly (Post-traumatic OA).
Classification (Rockwood)
| Type | AC Ligaments | CC Ligaments | Displacement | Clinical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Sprained | Intact | None | Tender ACJ, no step |
| II | Torn | Sprained | 25-50% CC widening | Mild step |
| III | Torn | Torn | 25-100% superior displacement | Obvious step, piano key |
| IV | Torn | Torn | Posterior displacement | Clavicle displaced posteriorly |
| V | Torn | Torn | 100-300% superior displacement | Gross stepoff; tented skin |
| VI | Torn | Torn | Inferior / subcoracoid | Rare; high-energy trauma |
Anatomical Considerations
- ACJ is a synovial joint between distal clavicle and medial acromion
- Contains intra-articular disc (fibrocartilagenous)
- AC ligaments: superior, inferior, anterior, posterior
- CC ligaments: conoid (medial) and trapezoid (lateral) — key to vertical stability
- Deltoid and trapezius fascia provide additional dynamic stability
Symptoms
Typical Presentation:
Variable by Severity:
Signs
Red Flags
[!CAUTION] Red Flags — Assess carefully if:
- Posterior clavicle displacement (Type IV) — risk to great vessels and trachea
- Neurovascular deficit in arm (rare but serious)
- Open injury or tented skin (Type V)
- Associated fracture (clavicle, scapula, rib)
- High-energy mechanism (exclude other injuries)
Structured Approach
General:
- Observe both shoulders from front and above
- Compare symmetry
- Note any deformity or swelling
Inspection:
- Step deformity (lateral clavicle prominence)
- Swelling/bruising over ACJ
- Skin integrity (tenting, open injury)
Palpation:
- Tenderness over ACJ
- Step between clavicle and acromion
- Clavicle shaft (exclude fracture)
- Scapula and ribs
Range of Motion:
- Active ROM often limited by pain
- Cross-body adduction reproduces pain
Special Tests
| Test | Technique | Positive Finding | Sensitivity/Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-body Adduction Test | Adduct arm across chest | Pain at ACJ | 77% / 79% |
| Piano Key Sign | Press down on distal clavicle | Clavicle depresses and springs back | Indicates Type III+ |
| O'Brien Test | Arm 90° forward flexed, 10° adducted, pronated; resisted forward flexion | Pain at ACJ (or labral if deep) | 78% / 74% |
| Paxinos Test | Thumb on clavicle, fingers on scapular spine; squeeze | Pain at ACJ | 79% / 50% |
First-Line (Bedside)
- Clinical examination — Often diagnostic
- Neurovascular assessment — Document if any deficit
Laboratory Tests
| Test | Expected Finding | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Not routinely required | — | — |
Imaging
| Modality | Findings | Indication |
|---|---|---|
| X-ray: Zanca view | ACJ joint space, displacement | Gold standard; 10-15° cephalic tilt |
| X-ray: Bilateral | Compare CC distances | Essential for grading |
| X-ray: Weight-bearing (stressed) | Accentuates displacement | Controversial; can miss some Grade III |
| Axillary lateral | Posterior displacement (Type IV) | If Type IV suspected |
| MRI | Soft tissue/ligament detail | Chronic injuries, surgical planning |
CC Distance Measurement
- Normal CC distance: 11-13mm
- Type II: 25-50% increase
- Type III: 25-100% increase (less than or equal to double contralateral)
- Type V: 100-300% increase (greater than double contralateral)
Diagnostic Criteria
- Clinical diagnosis based on mechanism, examination, and imaging
- Rockwood classification guides management
Management Algorithm
Shoulder Trauma (Direct Blow)
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLINICAL ASSESSMENT │
│ - "Piano Key" Sign? │
│ - Skin Tenting? (Grade V - Urgent) │
│ - Neurovasc Check │
│ - X-Ray: Zanca View (Bilateral for comparison) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ROCKWOOD CLASSIFICATION │
└─────────┬───────────────┬────────────────┬───────┘
↓ ↓ ↓
GRADES I-II GRADE III GRADES IV-VI
(AC sprain / (Complete tear) (Displaced /
Partial CC) (Displaced) Tented)
↓ ↓ ↓
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ CONSERVATIVE │ │ DECISION? │ │ SURGICAL │
│ (Standard Care) │ │(Grey Zone) │ │ (Indicated) │
└─────────────────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬───────┘
↓ │
┌────────────────┼───────────────┘
↓ ↓
Low Demand / High Demand /
Sedentary Overhead Athlete
↓ ↓
CONSERVATIVE SURGICAL
(Sling + PT) (Stabilization)
Acute/Emergency Management
Immediate Actions:
- Arm sling for comfort
- Ice packs
- Analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs)
- Assess for red flags (open injury, neurovascular deficit)
Conservative Management (Types I-II, Most Type III)
The cornerstone is "Benign Neglect" of the deformity to restore function.
Rehabilitation Protocol:
| Phase | Time | Goal | Restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Protection | 0-2 Weeks | Pain Control | Sling full time. No lifting. Hand/Elbow ROM only. |
| 2. Mobilisation | 2-4 Weeks | Regain Range (ROM) | Wean sling. Active Assist ROM (Pulleys). Avoid Adduction (Cross body) as it stresses ACJ. |
| 3. Strengthening | 4-8 Weeks | Scapular Control | Isometrics -> Isotonics. Rotator cuff loading. "Setting" the scapula. |
| 4. Return to Sport | >8 Weeks | Impact conditioning | Contact drills. Padding over ACJ ("Donut" pad). |
Counselling for the "Bump":
- Patients must accept the cosmetic deformity.
- "The bump is permanent, but the pain is not."
- Removing the bump (pushing it down) surgically often fails or leaves scars worse than the bump.
Surgical Management (Types IV-VI, Failed Type III)
Indications:
- Types IV, V, VI
- Type III: Elite athlete, manual worker, failed conservative
- Chronic symptomatic ACJ injury (delayed reconstruction)
Surgical Options:
1. Acute Stabilization (less than 3-4 weeks) - "The Suspension Bridge"
- Technique: Arthroscopic TightRope / DogBone.
- Concept: A heavy suture button suspension between Coracoid and Clavicle. Mimics the CC ligaments.
- Pros: Minimally invasive. Strong.
- Cons: Fracture of coracoid. Implant irritation.
2. Chronic Reconstruction (>4 weeks) - "The Weaver-Dunn"
- Technique: Modified Weaver-Dunn.
- Step 1: Excision of distal 1cm of clavicle (removes arthritic joint).
- Step 2: Transfer of Coraco-Acromial (CA) ligament to the distal clavicle.
- Step 3: Augmentation with suture/tendon graft (as CA ligament is weak).
- Pros: Biological solution. Deals with arthritis.
- Cons: Open surgery. Weaker than native ligaments.
3. The Hook Plate
- Technique: Metal plate screwed to clavicle with a hook under the acromion.
- Pros: Very strong reduction.
- Cons: Must be removed (2nd surgery). Subacromial erosion/impingement.
Disposition
- Type I-II: Discharge from ED with sling; GP or fracture clinic follow-up
- Type III: Orthopaedic clinic review for shared decision; most conservative initially
- Type IV-VI: Urgent orthopaedic referral for surgical planning
- Follow-up: Review at 2 weeks; physiotherapy at 2-4 weeks
Immediate (Minutes-Hours)
| Complication | Incidence | Presentation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open injury / skin tenting | Rare | Skin compromise | Urgent surgery |
| Vascular injury (Type IV) | Very rare | Arm ischaemia | Urgent vascular input |
Early (Days-Weeks)
- Pain: Expected; adequate analgesia important
- Stiffness: Early mobilisation reduces risk
Late (Months-Years)
- Chronic ACJ pain: Most common complication
- Cosmetic deformity: Persistent step (often not functionally limiting)
- Post-traumatic ACJ arthritis: May require distal clavicle excision
- Residual weakness: Usually improves with physiotherapy
- Calcification of CC ligaments: May cause local symptoms
- Hardware complications (surgical): Hook plate erosion; TightRope migration; infection
Natural History
- Type I-II: Excellent outcomes with conservative management
- Type III: 70-90% do well conservatively; 10-30% have persistent symptoms requiring surgery
- Type IV-VI: Poor outcomes without surgery
Outcomes with Treatment
| Variable | Type I-II (Conservative) | Type III (Conservative) | Type III-VI (Surgical) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return to sport | 1-4 weeks | 6-12 weeks | 3-6 months |
| Persistent pain | 5-10% | 20-30% | 10-15% |
| Full ROM recovery | 95%+ | 90% | 85-95% |
| Revision rate | N/A | N/A | 5-10% |
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis:
- Lower grade injury (I-II)
- Early treatment
- Good physiotherapy compliance
- Low-demand patient
Poor Prognosis:
- High-grade injury (V-VI)
- Delayed presentation (chronic)
- High-demand athlete / manual worker
- Previous ACJ injury
- Non-compliance with rehabilitation
Key Guidelines
- ISAKOS Upper Extremity Committee Consensus (2014) — Classification and management of acromioclavicular joint injuries. ISAKOS
- BOA Standards (BESS) — British Elbow and Shoulder Society guidance.
Landmark Trials
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2015) — Type III ACJ injuries: Operative vs Non-Operative
- 83 patients randomised
- Key finding: No significant difference in functional outcome at 2 years
- Key finding: Surgical group had better cosmetic outcome but more complications
- Clinical Impact: Supports conservative management as first-line for Type III
Beitzel et al. (2013) — Surgical techniques comparison
- Systematic review of surgical techniques
- Key finding: No single technique demonstrated clear superiority
- Clinical Impact: Technique selection based on surgeon experience and patient factors
Evidence Strength
| Intervention | Level | Key Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative for Type I-II | 2a | Cohort studies |
| Conservative vs Surgery for Type III | 1b | Canadian RCT |
| Surgical for Type IV-VI | 4 | Expert consensus |
| Hook plate vs TightRope | 2b | Comparative studies |
What is an ACJ injury?
The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is where your collarbone meets the top of your shoulder blade. An ACJ injury (sometimes called a "separated shoulder") happens when you fall directly onto the point of your shoulder, stretching or tearing the ligaments that hold these bones together. This is different from a dislocated shoulder (where the ball comes out of the socket).
Why does it matter?
The severity of the injury determines how well it heals. Most ACJ injuries are mild (Type I-II) and heal very well without surgery. More severe injuries may leave a visible "bump" on top of your shoulder where the collarbone sits higher than normal, and some may need surgery to restore function.
How is it treated?
-
Mild injuries (Type I-II): Rest in a sling for comfort, painkillers, and physiotherapy. You can usually return to normal activities within 2-4 weeks.
-
Moderate injuries (Type III): Usually treated with a sling and physiotherapy first. Most people recover well, but if pain and weakness persist after 3-6 months, surgery may be considered.
-
Severe injuries (Type IV-VI): Usually require surgery to repair or reconstruct the ligaments and hold the collarbone in the correct position.
What to expect
- Pain and swelling are worst in the first few days
- You may have a permanent "bump" on top of your shoulder — this is usually cosmetic and doesn't cause problems
- Physiotherapy is important to regain strength and movement
- Return to contact sports typically takes 6-12 weeks for moderate injuries
When to seek help
Contact your doctor or return to hospital if:
- Your pain is getting worse despite painkillers
- The skin over the bump becomes very tight, red, or breaks
- You have numbness or weakness in your hand or fingers
- You notice increasing swelling or deformity
Primary Guidelines
- Beitzel K, et al. Current concepts in the management of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):387-397. PMID: 23369479
- Rockwood CA. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
Key Trials
- Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of nonoperative versus operative treatment of acute acromio-clavicular joint dislocation. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(11):479-487. PMID: 26489054
- Xara-Leite F, et al. Surgical versus conservative treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular joint injuries: a meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(1):17-29. PMID: 35157629
Further Resources
- British Elbow and Shoulder Society: bess.org.uk
- Shoulder and Elbow (journal): journals.sagepub.com/home/sel
The "Painful Shoulder" Station
1. Look (The Step)
- Expose both shoulders.
- The Step Deformity: Is the lateral end of the clavicle prominent? (Type III-V).
- Skin: Any tenting? (Grade V - Emergency).
- Scapula: Winging? Dyskinesis?
2. Feel (The Tender Spot)
- Palpate the SC Joint -> Clavicle -> AC Joint.
- Accuracy: ACJ tenderness is sensitive but not specific.
- The Piano Key Test:
- Push down on the distal clavicle.
- If it "bobs" up and down, the CC ligaments are gone (Grade III+).
- Tip: Do this gently. It hurts.
3. Move (The Painful Arc)
- High Arc Pain: Pain at 170-180° abduction (Terminal arc) is ACJ. (Pain at 60-120° is Subacromial).
- Scarf Test: Cross-body adduction. "Reaching for the scarf". Compresses the ACJ. Pain = Positive.
Viva Questions:
- Q: Classify ACJ Injuries.
- A: Rockwood Classification. Types I-VI based on displacement and ligament status.
- Q: Why do we take a Zanca View?
- A: It is an AP with 10-15° Cephalic Tilt. It removes the scapular spine overlap to visualize the ACJ clearly.
- Q: Management of Type III?
- A: Controversial. Evidence suggests EQUAL functional outcomes for Conservative vs Surgical. Conservative first ($/Risk/Recovery). Surgery for elite overhead athletes.
- Q: What structures are torn in Type III?
- A: The AC ligaments, the CC ligaments (Conoid/Trapezoid), and the deltotrapezial fascia.
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Consult an orthopaedic surgeon for ACJ injury management.